Shivani Malik1, Lidia Villanova2, Shinji Tanaka3, Misato Aonuma4, Nilotpal Roy5, Elisabeth Berber1, Jonathan R Pollack6, Eriko Michishita-Kioi3, Katrin F Chua1. 1. 1] Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Gerontology and Metabolism, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA [2] Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California 94304, USA. 2. 1] Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Gerontology and Metabolism, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA [2] Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California 94304, USA [3] Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. 3. Venture Science Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., 1-2-58 Hiromachi, Tokyo 140-8710, Japan. 4. Biological Research Department, Daiichi Sankyo RD Novare Co., Ltd., 1-16-13, Kitakasai, Tokyo 134-8630. 5. Diabetes Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143. 6. Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Abstract
Metastasis is responsible for over 90% of cancer-associated mortality. In epithelial carcinomas, a key process in metastatic progression is the epigenetic reprogramming of an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-like (EMT) change towards invasive cellular phenotypes. In non-epithelial cancers, different mechanisms must underlie metastatic change, but relatively little is known about the factors involved. Here, we identify the chromatin regulatory Sirtuin factor SIRT7 as a key regulator of metastatic phenotypes in both epithelial and mesenchymal cancer cells. In epithelial prostate carcinomas, high SIRT7 levels are associated with aggressive cancer phenotypes, metastatic disease, and poor patient prognosis, and depletion of SIRT7 can reprogram these cells to a less aggressive phenotype. Interestingly, SIRT7 is also important for maintaining the invasiveness and metastatic potential of non-epithelial sarcoma cells. Moreover, SIRT7 inactivation dramatically suppresses cancer cell metastasis in vivo, independent of changes in primary tumor growth. Mechanistically, we also uncover a novel link between SIRT7 and its family member SIRT1, providing the first demonstration of direct interaction and functional interplay between two mammalian sirtuins. Together with previous work, our findings highlight the broad role of SIRT7 in maintaining the metastatic cellular phenotype in diverse cancers.
Metastasis is responsible for over 90% of cancer-associated mortality. In epithelial carcinomas, a key process in metastatic progression is the epigenetic reprogramming of an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-like (EMT) change towards invasive cellular phenotypes. In non-epithelial cancers, different mechanisms must underlie metastatic change, but relatively little is known about the factors involved. Here, we identify the chromatin regulatory Sirtuin factor SIRT7 as a key regulator of metastatic phenotypes in both epithelial and mesenchymal cancer cells. In epithelial prostate carcinomas, high SIRT7 levels are associated with aggressive cancer phenotypes, metastatic disease, and poor patient prognosis, and depletion of SIRT7 can reprogram these cells to a less aggressive phenotype. Interestingly, SIRT7 is also important for maintaining the invasiveness and metastatic potential of non-epithelial sarcoma cells. Moreover, SIRT7 inactivation dramatically suppresses cancer cell metastasis in vivo, independent of changes in primary tumor growth. Mechanistically, we also uncover a novel link between SIRT7 and its family member SIRT1, providing the first demonstration of direct interaction and functional interplay between two mammalian sirtuins. Together with previous work, our findings highlight the broad role of SIRT7 in maintaining the metastatic cellular phenotype in diverse cancers.
SIRT7 is a member of the Sirtuin family of NAD+-dependent enzymes, which
play diverse roles in aging, metabolism, and disease biology12.
Relatively little is understood about SIRT7 function, and only a handful of molecular
substrates of SIRT7 have yet been identified. At chromatin, SIRT7 catalyzes selective
deacetylation of lysine 18 on histone H3 (H3K18), an emerging epigenetic biomarker of
aggressive tumors and poor clinical outcome in cancer patients3. Through
H3K18 deacetylation at specific promoters, SIRT7 controls a tumor suppressive gene
expression program that stabilizes the transformed state of cancer cells. Indeed,
inactivation of SIRT7 is sufficient to reverse essential properties of cancer cells,
including anchorage-independent growth, loss of contact inhibition, growth in low serum
conditions, and tumor growth in mouse xenograft assays3.Studies of SIRT7expression in humantumor tissues suggest that increased SIRT7 levels
may correlate with enhanced tumor aggressiveness1. For example, in
microarray analyses of human hepatocellular biopsies, SIRT7expression was found to
increase progressively from pre-neoplastic lesions to high-grade tumors4.
Modest increases in SIRT7expression have also been detected in thyroid and breast
cancer biopsies compared to normal control biopsies, with some correlation with more
advanced disease56. Similarly, high SIRT7expression correlated with
advanced tumor stage and decreased overall and disease-free patient survival in colon
carcinoma cells7. These studies suggested that SIRT7 might play a role in
promoting the development of aggressive cancer phenotypes.Metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world8.
The multistep process of invasion and metastasis begins with local invasion, followed by
intravasation by cancer cells into nearby blood and lymphatic vessels and transit
through the lymphatic and hematogenous systems89. Cancer cells then
extravasate from the lumina of such vessels into the parenchyma of distant tissues,
where they form micrometastases that can grow and colonize as macroscopic tumors. The
process by which neoplastic cells acquire the traits necessary to execute the
invasion-metastasis cascade have been primarily studied in the context of epithelial
cancers, such as carcinomas, where acquisition of metastatic potential is characterized
by the activation of an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like program810. During this reversible process, expression of key epithelial
maintenance factors such as E-cadherin (CDH1) is suppressed, leading to loss of
E-cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesion and other epithelial traits.
Concomitantly, expression of mesenchymal markers and extracellular matrix remodeling
enzymes is increased, together with a profound reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton.
This phenotypic EMT reprogramming endows cancer cells with the plasticity and motility
necessary to undergo the invasion-metastasis cascade. In contrast to the role of EMT in
metastatic progression of carcinomas, the mechanisms underlying metastasis of
non-epithelial tumors, such as mesenchymal soft tissue sarcomas, are much less
understood and are proposed to differ substantially from those in epithelial
cancers11.Here, we have uncovered a role for SIRT7 in promoting acquisition of an invasive
phenotype in both epithelial and mesenchymal cancer cells. Inactivation of SIRT7
reverses the loss of E-cadherinexpression and other associated EMT changes in carcinoma
cells, and surprisingly, also attenuates the invasiveness and metastasis of mesenchymal
sarcoma cells. Importantly, we use a system in which the role of SIRT7 in regulating the
metastatic potential of cancer cells in vivo can be examined without potential
confounding effects of SIRT7 on intrinsic primary tumor growth. We also report that
SIRT7 interacts functionally with SIRT1, another member of the sirtuin family that has
been shown to promote prostate cancer cell migration and metastasis by repressing
E-cadherinexpression. Together, our findings identify SIRT7 activity as a positive
determinant of cancer metastasis, and uncover previously unappreciated crosstalk between
two chromatin regulators of the sirtuin family that promote the invasive and metastatic
properties of cancer cells.
Results
Increased SIRT7 expression and gene amplification is associated with
metastatic cancer
We previously demonstrated that SIRT7 is over-expressed in several
patient-matched tumor samples3. To further explore the clinical
relevance of SIRT7 over-expression, we analyzed humancancer datasets from the
cBioportal database for Cancer Genomics. This analysis revealed many humancancer types that harbor amplifications of SIRT7, and a smaller number with
mutations at the SIRT7 locus (Fig. 1A). SIRT7
amplifications were by far the predominant genetic change observed in several
epithelial cancers (e.g., bladder, liver, prostate and breast carcinomas), as
well as in sarcomas. Notably, one study conducted on 61 prostate
cancerpatients showed amplification of the SIRT7 locus occurring
exclusively in tumors that were metastatic and associated with poor survival
(Fig. 1B)12. In addition, in a humanprostate cancer dataset13 from the Oncomine gene expression
database (http://www.oncomine.com), SIRT7 was significantly over-expressed
in metastatic sites compared to the primary tumor sites (Fig.
1C). Moreover, examination of prostate cancerpatient microarray
expression datasets14 revealed that while SIRT7expression is
modestly increased (p = 0.039) in prostate cancer compared to normal prostate
tissue controls (Fig. 1D), SIRT7 levels are much more
dramatically elevated (p = 4.5e-5) in metastatic lymph node samples compared to
primary prostate tumors (Fig. 1E). Together, these data
demonstrate that increased SIRT7expression is specifically associated with
humancancer metastasis.
Figure 1
SIRT7 amplification and over-expression is associated with metastatic disease
and poor prognosis.
(A), Analysis of several cBio Cancer Genomics datasets shows that SIRT7 is
amplified in many epithelial cancers and in mesenchymal sarcomas. (B),
Analysis of a reported mutational landscape of metastatic prostate cancer
shows exclusive amplification of SIRT7 in prostate cancer patients with
metastatic disease and poor survival12. (C), Meta-analysis of
the prostate cancer dataset13 using the Oncomine database
showing significantly higher expression of SIRT7 in metastatic tumor sites
compared to primary tumor or normal prostate tissues. (D), SIRT7 expression
in prostate cancer patient tissues versus normal prostate controls. (E),
SIRT7 expression in primary prostate cancer tumors versus metastatic tumor
tissue. In (D), and (E), levels are log2 normalized values (median, lower
and upper quartiles are shown), retrieved from Lapointe et al14.
SIRT7 promotes cancer cell migration and invasiveness
To overcome the tissue basement membrane and invade into the stroma, cancer cells
must acquire a motile phenotype. To investigate whether SIRT7 regulates the
directional migration of cancer cells, we performed wound-healing assays
following depletion of SIRT7 by RNA interference (Fig.
2A,E). A wound was created in the cell monolayer and cell migration
was monitored using time-lapse microscopy. SIRT7-depletion substantially
impaired migration of the metastatic prostate cancer cell line PC3, reducing the
healing percentage by ~40% compared to control cells (Fig.
2A). Notably, no significant changes in proliferation were observed
under the time frame of these experiments (data not shown).
Figure 2
SIRT7 promotes cancer cell migration and invasiveness.
(A), Wound healing assay showing reduced migration of SIRT7-depleted
(shSIRT7) PC3 cells. (B), Transwell assay showing reduced invasion of SIRT7
depleted PC3 cells. (C), 3D Matrigel assay showing reduced invasive growth
of SIRT7 depleted cells through surrounding matrix. Images taken 3 days
after plating of cells. (D), Phalloidin staining of F-actin revealed a more
collapsed actin cytoskeleton in SIRT7-depleted PC3 cells compared to
controls. (E), Impaired cell migration and wound healing in SIRT7- depleted
HT1080 cells. (F), Impaired invasion of SIRT-depleted HT1080 cells in
Transwell assay. (G), Reduced invasion of HT1080 cells overexpressing the
catalytically inactive (S7-HY) SIRT7 protein in the Transwell assay.
We next asked whether SIRT7 depletion affects cancer cell invasiveness using two
complementary assays. In the Transwell invasion assay, SIRT7-depleted PC3 cells
showed reduced invasion through a Matrigel BiocoatTM basement
membrane matrix (Fig. 2B). In an independent
three-dimensional Matrigel assay, SIRT7-depletion reduced the ability of PC3
cells to invade through the surrounding matrix, as manifested in loss of the
branching growth pattern displayed by control cells (Fig.
2C). Consistent with this impaired migration and invasiveness,
staining for F-actin (Phalloidin staining) revealed a collapsed actin
cytoskeleton upon SIRT7 depletion in PC3 cells (Fig. 2D).
Notably, SIRT7 inactivation in the HT1080 sarcoma cell line led to similar
reductions in cell migration during wound healing and in Transwell invasion
(Fig. 2E, F). These observations demonstrate that
inhibiting SIRT7 can reverse metastatic properties of both epithelial and
mesenchymal cancer cell types. Moreover, over-expression of a SIRT7 variant
bearing a point mutation in the catalytic site (H187Y) also reduced HT1080 cell
invasiveness, consistent with a dominant negative effect (Fig.
2G). Together, these results demonstrate that SIRT7 is a positive
regulator of cancer cell migration and invasion abilities.
SIRT7 regulates expression of invasion-related genes and EMT markers in
epithelial and mesenchymal cancer cells
To gain additional mechanistic insight into the role of SIRT7 in the
invasion-metastasis cascade, we first focused on the effects of SIRT7
inactivation in epithelial carcinoma cells. In these cells, a transition from
epithelial to mesenchymal characteristics plays a major role in the
acquisition of invasive and motile cellular behavior, and is
associated with decreased levels of the epithelial marker and
invasion-suppressor factor E-cadherin (CDH1), concomitant with de
novo expression of mesenchymal markers such as the intermediate filament
Vimentin1516.Previous studies showed that elevated E-cadherinexpression
can suppress epithelial tumor cell invasiveness, whereas reduced
E-cadherin levels correlate with more aggressive tumor stages and poor clinical
outcome1718. Similarly, global hypoacetylation of H3K18,
the histone substrate of SIRT7, predicts poor prognosis of prostate cancer
patients19. Consistent with these observations, our western
analyses revealed that global levels of E-cadherin and H3K18Ac were
substantially lower in the highly aggressive PC3 cell line than in the less
aggressive LNCaP cell line, whereas SIRT7 protein showed the opposite pattern
(Fig. 3A). Moreover, analysis of large microarray
datasets of prostate cancerpatient data14 revealed a clear
inverse correlation between SIRT7 levels and E-cadherin (p = 4.7E-5) (Fig. 3B). These observations suggested that SIRT7 might
regulate the expression of E-cadherin or other EMT regulatory factors.
Figure 3
SIRT7 expression correlates inversely with H3K18Ac and E-cadherin in prostate
carcinoma.
(A), Western blot analysis showing enhanced expression of SIRT7 and lower
levels of H3K18Ac and E-cadherin in PC3 cells as compared to LNCaP cells.
(B), SIRT7 expression is negatively correlated with E-cadherin (CDH1)
expression in human prostate cancers. cDNA microarray expression levels are
log2 normalized values, retrieved from Lapointe et al14. For
CDH1, the average expression value from 4 cDNA probes was used.
Correlation (R) and corresponding P-values are indicated. Western Blots were
carried under same experimental conditions. Uncropped images are available
in supplementary figure 1a.
Indeed, western analysis revealed that in SIRT7 deficient PC3 cells, E-cadherin
protein levels were up-regulated, and Vimentin protein levels were reduced,
consistent with a reversal of the EMT phenotype (Fig. 4A).
Next, we examined the mRNA expression levels of several additional markers of
EMT. In addition to the up-regulation of E-cadherin mRNA, SIRT7-deficientPC3
cells also showed significantly increased mRNA levels of DAB2IP (DAB2
interacting protein) (Fig. 4B), a tumor suppressor gene
whose loss promotes EMT and metastasis in prostate cancer2021.
At the same time, inactivation of SIRT7 led to down-regulation of the
EMT-inducing transcription factor Slug (SNAI2) (Fig.
4B), a transcription factor of the Snail family that is one of the
central regulators of the EMT program15. Thus, the reduced
invasiveness of SIRT7-deficientPC3 cells is associated with a reprogramming
towards epithelial gene expression, with increased expression of EMT-suppressing
genes and down-regulation of EMT-promoting genes.
Figure 4
SIRT7 regulates metastasis regulatory genes in epithelial and mesenchymal
cancer cells.
(A), Western blot analysis showing decreased E-cadherin protein and increased
Vimentin levels in SIRT7-deficient PC3 cells (shSIRT7). (B), RT-qPCR
analysis showing modulation of E-cadherin, DAB2IP, MMP16, and Slug
expression in SIRT7-depleted PC3. (C), RT-qPCR showing decreased expression
of MMP16 and VEGF-A in SIRT7 depleted HT1080 cells. Western Blots were
carried under same experimental conditions. Uncropped images are available
in supplementary figure 1b.
Importantly, however, our finding that SIRT7 affects the invasive properties of
HT1080 sarcoma cells (Fig. 2E–G) suggests that
SIRT7 must also impinge on metastasis regulatory pathways that operate in
mesenchymal cancers, independent of EMT. Although relatively little is known
about the mechanisms or factors involved in metastasis of mesenchymal tumors,
recent studies suggest that important players include matrix metalloproteinase
(MMP) enzymes as well as the extracellular signaling factor VEGF-A (vascular
endothelial growth factor)1122. Up-regulation of MMPs is
associated with metastatic potential in both epithelial carcinoma and
mesenchymal sarcoma tumors811, and endows tumor cells with the
ability to breakdown the extracellular matrix and disrupt the basement membrane
for tumor cell invasion. We found that SIRT7-inactivation in both PC3 and HT1080
cells led to reduced expression of the matrix metalloproteinase gene
MMP16 (Fig. 4B,C). Moreover, SIRT7-deficientHT1080 cells had reduced expression of VEGF-A (Fig. 4C),
which was recently shown to play a crucial role in metastasis of these
cells822.Together, these results suggest that SIRT7 controls the expression of a subset of
genes linked to diverse aspects of the invasion-metastasis cascade, including
EMT-regulatory factors in epithelial cancers, as well as regulators of cellular
invasiveness and extracellular signaling factors in mesenchymal sarcoma
cells.
SIRT7 cooperates with SIRT1 to repress E-cadherin expression
Similar to our findings on SIRT7, previous work showed that the SIRT7 family
member SIRT1 can enhance metastatic properties of prostate cancer cells and
promote transcriptional repression of E-cadherin2324. However,
whether these effects of SIRT1 are mediated through its deacetylase activity has
not been directly demonstrated, and the biochemical mechanisms underlying SIRT1
regulation of EMT-related genes and metastasis are still unclear. Indeed, the
role of the deacetylase activity of SIRT1 in tumor growth and metastasis was
recently challenged by observations that the catalytic activity of SIRT1 has
little effect on tumor growth and metastasis in a mousetumor model25.The similar roles of SIRT1 and SIRT7 in E-cadherin regulation prompted us to ask
if these proteins might intersect in a common mechanism. Consistent with this
possibility, we observed that SIRT7 interacts physically with SIRT1 in multiple
assays, using both Flag-tagged and endogenous SIRT1 and SIRT7 proteins (Fig. 5A–C). To directly investigate functional
interplay between SIRT1 and SIRT7, we asked if SIRT7 influences the ability of
SIRT1 to repress E-cadherinexpression. Strikingly, RNAi-depletion of SIRT7
completely abolished the previously reported repression of E-cadherin levels by
SIRT1 (Fig. 5D, E). Interestingly, our data also revealed
that the deacetylase activity of SIRT1 is not required for E-cadherin
repression, because a catalytically inactive SIRT1 protein (SIRT1-HY) reduced
E-cadherin levels as well as wild-type SIRT1 (Fig. 5D, E).
These observations, together with our finding that both wild-type and mutant
SIRT1 proteins interact equally with SIRT7 (Fig. 5F),
suggest that the physical interaction of SIRT1 with SIRT7 is required for
SIRT1-dependent transcriptional repression of E-cadherin in prostate carcinoma
cells.
Figure 5
SIRT7 physically interacts with SIRT1 and is required for SIRT1-mediated
repression of E-cadherin.
(A), Western analysis showing co-immunoprecipitation (IP) of Flag-tagged
SIRT7 and endogenous SIRT1. (B), Western analysis showing co-IP of
Flag-tagged SIRT1 and endogenous SIRT7. (C), Western analysis showing co-IP
of endogenous SIRT1 and SIRT7 proteins. (D), q-PCR analysis of the
E-cadherin expression following overexpression of wild-type (S1WT) or
catalytically inactive (S1HY) SIRT1 proteins in Control or SIRT7-depleted
(shSIRT7) PC3 cells. (E), Western blot showing E-cadherin protein levels
from cells used in D. (F), Western blot analysis showing
co-immunoprecipitation of SIRT7 by the SIRT1 WT and HY mutant proteins.
Western Blots were carried under same experimental conditions. Uncropped
images are available in supplementary figure 1c.
SIRT7 depletion impairs metastasis in vivo
We previously showed that SIRT7 depletion impairs cancer cell proliferation and
reduces primary tumor growth in mouse xenograft assays3. In
addition to its effects on the primary tumor, the reduced proliferative capacity
of SIRT7-deficient cancer cells could also contribute to faster growth of
metastatic lesions, even without fundamental changes in metastatic potential.
Therefore, to exclude effects of cell proliferation on scoring of metastatic
activity, we partially depleted SIRT7 to levels at which little or no
significant changes on primary tumor growth were observed (Fig.
6A, B). We then used these cells in a lung metastasis model assay. As
expected, tail vein injection of mice with control treated cells led to dramatic
metastatic lung lesions. Strikingly, in the SIRT7-depleted cells, the lung
metastases were virtually eliminated (Fig. 6C). These
findings provide evidence that SIRT7 inactivation in cancer cells specifically
prevents metastasis in vivo, independent of changes in intrinsic tumor
cell proliferative capacity.
Figure 6
SIRT7 depletion inhibits lung metastasis in vivo.
(A). Western blot of SIRT7 expression in cells with partial SIRT7 depletion.
(B), Tumor volume of subcutaneous xenografts of the SIRT7-depleted and
control cells. (C), Effects of SIRT7 depletion on lung metastasis following
tail vein injection of immunodeficient mice with control (shcontrol) or
SIRT7-depleted (shSIRT7-1, shSIRT7-2) cells. Non-Injected Control (NIC):
normal lungs. *, ** indicate significant differences between the sh-control
and shSIRT7 groups by Welch's T test (**: P < 0.005,
*: P < 0.05). # indicates significant difference between the no
injection control lungs and the sh-control HT1080-injected group (P
< 0.005). ns, non-specific band.
Discussion
Over the past few years, growing evidence has indicated that SIRT7 has important
roles in regulating oncogenic transformation and tumor biology. Through
deacetylation of histone H3 on lysine K18 at chromatin, SIRT7 controls a tumor
suppressive gene expression program that maintains the neoplastic state of cancer
cells3. SIRT7 also orchestrates several molecular processes
– including ribosomal RNA and protein synthesis and ER stress
responsiveness – that could be important for cellular changes in
cancer326. Consistent with these functions, inactivation of
SIRT7 in cancer cells leads to loss of oncogenic properties and reduces the ability
of these cells to form tumors in mice347. In this study, we show
that in addition to its effects on primary tumors, inactivation of SIRT7 also has
specific metastasis suppressing effects, reducing the migration and invasion of
cancer cells in vitro and preventing metastasis in vivo. Importantly,
we also identify SIRT7 as one of few known regulators of metastatic change in
mesenchymal cancers, for which candidate therapeutic targets are greatly needed27.Our findings fit well with recent evidence that SIRT7 depletion reduces metastasis by
colorectal cancer cells in mouse xenograft metastasis models7. Our
experiments extend these findings to non-epithelial soft tissue sarcoma cancers, and
importantly, also exclude the possibility that the observed decrease in metastatic
lesions might be due to changes in oncogenic properties more generally, rather than
metastatic cell properties per se. Specifically, we use a system in which SIRT7
depletion is titrated to levels where primary tumor growth is minimally or not
affected, and yet metastasis by these cells is virtually abolished.Recent analyses of humancancerpatient microarray datasets have detected elevated
levels of SIRT7 in hepatocellular and colorectal carcinomas, with higher SIRT7
levels correlating with increased disease severity47. In this
study, we have added to the humancancer genomics analyses in several ways. First,
we show that while SIRT7expression is higher in tumor compared to normal control
tissues, SIRT7 levels are even more dramatically elevated in metastatic tissue
compared to primary tumors. Second, we detect a significant enrichment for SIRT7
amplifications in a majority of tumor types that we analyzed, including carcinomas
of many tissue origins, and non-epithelial soft tissue sarcomas. By contrast, little
amplification of SIRT1 or SIRT6 was observed in similar analyses (data not shown).
Moreover, we show that in a set of prostate carcinoma samples, the SIRT7
amplifications are selectively detected in metastatic tumors with poor clinical
outcome, and not observed in primary tumors with better patient survival.
Finally, we demonstrate a strong inverse correlation between levels of
SIRT7 and E-cadherin, a marker of aggressive tumor stages and poor
clinical prognosis1718.We have uncovered a novel physical and functional interaction between SIRT7 and SIRT1
in controlling E-cadherinexpression. Based on our findings that the catalytic
activity of SIRT1 is dispensable for E-cadherin repression, whereas SIRT7 is
required for E-cadherin repression, we hypothesize that SIRT1 might function as a
scaffold protein in recruiting SIRT7 to the E-cadherin promoter for SIRT7-mediated
deacetylation of H3K18Ac. However, our data do not rule out alternative mechanistic
interactions between these two sirtuins. The requirement for SIRT7 in
SIRT1-dependent EMT promotion might also be relevant for understanding the
observation that in contrast to the EMT- and metastasis- promoting effects of SIRT7
reported in prostate cancer cells23, other work reported that in
breast cancer cells, SIRT7 suppresses EMT and tumor metastasis via deacetylation of
the Smad4 transcription factor28. These discrepant results were
attributed to potential cell-type specific mechanisms, and our data suggest that
these might involve differential interaction of SIRT1 with SIRT7 in the different
cell contexts.Our findings of functional interaction between SIRT1 and SIRT7 also suggest that
similar interplay might operate in additional physiologic contexts. For example,
increased acetylation of the tumor suppressor p53 has been reported in
SIRT7-deficient hearts29, but little deacetylation activity of p53 by
SIRT7 was observed in vitro or in cultured cells32930. Since
SIRT1 is a robust p53 deacetylase, we speculate that SIRT7 levels might influence
p53 acetylation indirectly through its functional interaction with SIRT1, and this
might be biologically limiting in the context of the SIRT7mouse knockout hearts but
not some other settings. SIRT1 and SIRT7 are also both implicated in regulating rDNA
transcription in nucleoli but with opposite effects313233. It is
possible that these functions might also be linked via interaction of SIRT1 and
SIRT7 in nucleoli.Much evidence implicates regulation of protein acetylation and deacetylation in
diverse aspects of tumor biology, and inhibitors of non-sirtuin histone deacetylase
enzymes are already being intensively tested for anti-cancer therapy. Our
observations that high SIRT7expression is associated with aggressive metastatic
phenotypes of humantumors, and that SIRT7 depletion significantly impairs both
primary tumor growth and metastatic spread in mousetumor models, suggest
that pharmacologic targeting of SIRT7 might be a promising therapeutic
strategy, and could be used in the context of combinatorial therapy with other HDAC
inhibitors. Thus, our findings prompt future investigations into the roles of SIRT7
to exploit its use as a potential therapeutic target in advanced
cancer stages.
Methods
Cell Culture
Cells were grown in a humidified tissue culture incubator, at 37°C, 5%
CO2 atmosphere. LNCaP and PC3 cells were maintained in
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1%
penicillin-streptomycin and 1% L-glutamine (Gibco, Invitrogen). HT1080 cells
were grown in Advanced DMEM (Gibco, Invitrogen) in the presence of 10% FBS and
1% penicillin-streptomycin. All cells were obtained from the American Type
Culture Collection (Manassas, Virginia).
Plasmids
Lentiviral plasmids pSicoR-puro encoding shRNAs targeting SIRT7 mRNA were
generated as previously described3. Target sequences were as
follows: S7KD1, 5’-CACCTTTCTGTGAGAACGGAA-3′; S7KD2,
5’-TAGCCATTTGTCCTTGAGGAA-3′. The pBabe-puro retroviral
vectors for expression of human wild-type and H187Y SIRT7 proteins were
previously described3. Flag-tagged-SIRT1 WT and H355Y mutant
expression vectors were described in34.
Transwell Invasion Assay
The assay was performed according to BD BioCoatTM
manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, medium containing 10% FBS as a
chemoattractant was added to the wells of a 24-well plate. The Matrigel invasion
chambers were transferred to the wells containing the chemoattractant using
sterile forceps. A suspension of 104 HT1080 cells and 5*104 PC3 cells in serum-free media was loaded into the chambers. Cells
were incubated for 22–24hr in a humidified tissue culture incubator,
at 37°C, 5% CO2 atmosphere. The non-invading cells were
removed by scrubbing with a cotton tipped swab and the invading cells were fixed
with methanol for 2 minutes and stained with crystal violet for 10 minutes. The
inserts were dried and the membrane was photographed through the microscope at
10X magnification.
Wound Healing Assay
Cells were grown to confluent monolayers. A scratch was then made using
200 uL tip on cell monolayers. Cells were washed once each with PBS
and warm media. Cells were imaged immediately after creating the wound using a
time lapse microscope every 15 minutes for 12 hr for
HT1080 cells and 20 hr for PC3 cells.
3D Matrigel Assay
LDEV free Matrigel basement matrix (BD Biosciences, now Corning) was spread
evenly on the bottom of chamber slides and allowed to solidify at
37°C for 30 minutes. Control and SIRT7 KD PC3 cells were
suspended in 2% matrigel and spread over the matrix. Cells were fed every
3 days with fresh 2% matrigel. Images were taken every
2 days.
Phalloidin staining
Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes and
permeabilized with 0.1% with Triton-X for 5 minutes. Cells were
stained with 1:100 dilution of the F-actin probe Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin
(Life Technologies). Images were acquired on a fluorescence microscope using a
20x objective.
Co-immunoprecipitation and western blot
Cell lysates were prepared as described previously. 1 mg of total
protein was used for immunoprecipitation with SIRT7 antibody overnight. The
immunoprecipitated complex was incubated with Protein A/G beads (Sigma) for 1
hour followed by washing with 250 mM NaCl containing wash buffer 6
times. The beads were incubated at 37°C for 20 minutes and
the supernatant was used for western blot analysis. Flag-co-immunoprecipitation
was carried out by using ANTI-FLAG M2 affinity gel (A2220-10 ML,
Sigma).
Antibodies
E-cadherin antibody (610181) was purchased from BD Biosciences, SIRT1 (07-131)
and β-tubulin (05–661) antibodies were purchased from
Millipore. Vimentin antibody (V5255) was purchased from Sigma. The rabbit
polyclonal antibody specifically recognizing SIRT7 was raised against the
following synthetic peptide GWFGRGCTKRTKRKKVT and the affinity-purified antibody
was used in this study (ref. Michishita E, 2005). Acetylated lysine 18 of
histone H3 (H3K18Ac) antibody (ab1191) was purchased from Abcam and Lamin B
antibody (C20) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and reverse
transcribed using SuperScript III (Invitrogen) and oligo(dT) primers, according
to the manufacturers' instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR
analysis was performed on a Roche LightCycler 480 using the
manufacturer's SYBR Green system. PCR primers used are:E-cadherin: Forward 5’-GGTCTGTCATGGAAGGTGCT-3’; Reverse
5’-GATGGCGGCATTGTAGGT-3’DAB2IP: Forward 5’-TGGACGATGTGCTCTATGCC-3’; Reverse
5’-GGATGGTGATGGTTTGGTAG-3′MMP16: Forward 5'-ATGCAGCAGTTCTATGGCATT-3'; Reverse
5'-CTGGTCAGGTACACCGCA TC -3'Slug: Forward 5’-TGTTGCAGTGAGGGCAAGAA-3’; Reverse
5’-GACCCTGGTTGCTTCAAGGA-3′VEGF-A Forward 5’- CTACCTCCACCATGCCAAGT-3’; Reverse
5’-GCAGTAGCTGCGCTGATAGA-3’GAPDH: Forward 5’-AGCCACATCGCTCAGACAC-3’; Reverse
5’-GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC-3’
In vivo xenograft tumor and metastasis studies
Lung metastasis was analyzed following tail-vein injection of
1×106 control or SIRT7-deficientHT1080 cells into
SCID mice. Lungs were harvested, weighed and imaged after 28 days. Sub-cutaneous
xenograft primary tumor assays were performed as previously described3.
Author Contributions
S.M. and L.V. carried out the experiments and prepared Figs. 2–5. S.M.,
and N.R. analyzed the data in Fig. 1A–C. S.T. and M.A. performed the
experiments in Fig. 6, which were designed and interpreted by E.M.-K. J.R.P.
analyzed the data and prepared Figs. 1D, E, and 3A. E.B. contributed to experiments
in Fig. 5. K.F.C., S.M., and L.V. wrote the manuscript with input from E.M.-K.
Authors: Barry S Taylor; Nikolaus Schultz; Haley Hieronymus; Anuradha Gopalan; Yonghong Xiao; Brett S Carver; Vivek K Arora; Poorvi Kaushik; Ethan Cerami; Boris Reva; Yevgeniy Antipin; Nicholas Mitsiades; Thomas Landers; Igor Dolgalev; John E Major; Manda Wilson; Nicholas D Socci; Alex E Lash; Adriana Heguy; James A Eastham; Howard I Scher; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Chris Sander; Charles L Sawyers; William L Gerald Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Junxia Min; Alexander Zaslavsky; Giuseppe Fedele; Sara K McLaughlin; Elizabeth E Reczek; Thomas De Raedt; Isil Guney; David E Strochlic; Laura E Macconaill; Rameen Beroukhim; Roderick T Bronson; Sandra Ryeom; William C Hahn; Massimo Loda; Karen Cichowski Journal: Nat Med Date: 2010-02-14 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jiyung Shin; Ming He; Yufei Liu; Silvana Paredes; Lidia Villanova; Katharine Brown; Xiaolei Qiu; Noushin Nabavi; Mary Mohrin; Kathleen Wojnoonski; Patrick Li; Hwei-Ling Cheng; Andrew J Murphy; David M Valenzuela; Hanzhi Luo; Pankaj Kapahi; Ronald Krauss; Raul Mostoslavsky; George D Yancopoulos; Frederick W Alt; Katrin F Chua; Danica Chen Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Muhammad Umar Jawad; Nandor Garamszegi; Susanna P Garamszegi; Mayrin Correa-Medina; Juan A Diez; Rong Wen; Sean P Scully Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Zhen Tong; Yi Wang; Xiaoyu Zhang; David D Kim; Sushabhan Sadhukhan; Quan Hao; Hening Lin Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Jian Fang; Alessandro Ianni; Christian Smolka; Olesya Vakhrusheva; Hendrik Nolte; Marcus Krüger; Astrid Wietelmann; Nicolas G Simonet; Juan M Adrian-Segarra; Alejandro Vaquero; Thomas Braun; Eva Bober Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Wesley Wei Wang; Maria Angulo-Ibanez; Jie Lyu; Yadagiri Kurra; Zhen Tong; Bo Wu; Ling Zhang; Vangmayee Sharma; Jennifer Zhou; Hening Lin; Yi Qin Gao; Wei Li; Katrin F Chua; Wenshe Ray Liu Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Evandro Fei Fang; Morten Scheibye-Knudsen; Katrin F Chua; Mark P Mattson; Deborah L Croteau; Vilhelm A Bohr Journal: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 94.444