Literature DB >> 25922191

Geographic access to gynecologic cancer care in the United States.

David I Shalowitz1, Alexandra M Vinograd2, Robert L Giuntoli3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women who live distant from the closest subspecialty treatment center are at risk of failing to utilize high-quality care for gynecologic cancers. There has not yet been a comprehensive, national investigation of populations affected by geographic barriers to gynecologic cancer care.
METHODS: Geographic Information Systems (GIS) were used to identify United States counties farther than 50miles from the closest gynecologic oncologist, and hospital referral regions (HRRs) that do not contain the primary professional address of at least one gynecologic oncologist. US Census data were used to analyze counties' demographic characteristics. County-level cancer incidence was estimated using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's State Cancer Profiles.
RESULTS: Thirty-six percent (1125/3143) of counties are further than 50miles from the nearest gynecologic oncologist. A total of 14.8 million women live in low-access counties (LACs). Annually, approximately 7663 women with gynecologic cancers may experience geography-related disparities in access. Residents of LACs have lower median household income, are more likely to be White and/or Hispanic, and less likely to be Black. Forty percent (123/306) of HRRs do not contain the primary address of a gynecologic oncologist.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 9% of the female population of the United States may experience geographic barriers to access high-quality care for gynecologic malignancies. Future investigations should assess whether residents of low-access counties utilize high-quality care less often, and whether there is a disparity in clinical outcomes. Disparities might be addressed by ensuring subspecialty care in low-access regions, and/or adjusting system structures to minimize the burdens of traveling long distances for cancer care.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access disparities; Cancer care delivery; Health services research

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25922191     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  26 in total

1.  Where you live matters: A National Cancer Database study of Medicaid expansion and endometrial cancer outcomes.

Authors:  David A Barrington; Jennifer A Sinnott; Corinne Calo; David E Cohn; Casey M Cosgrove; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Potential Consequences of Minimum-Volume Standards for Hospitals Treating Women With Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Yongmei Huang; Alexander Melamed; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Fady Khoury-Collado; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Is It Time to Centralize Ovarian Cancer Care in the United States?

Authors:  Renee A Cowan; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Ginger J Gardner; Douglas A Levine; Kara Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Oliver Zivanovic; William P Tew; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman; Hebert A Vargas Alvarez; Debra M Sarasohn; Svetlana Mironov; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Disparities in ovarian cancer survival in the United States (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.

Authors:  Sherri L Stewart; Rhea Harewood; Melissa Matz; Sun Hee Rim; Susan A Sabatino; Kevin C Ward; Hannah K Weir
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Utilization and Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Vulvar Cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie Cham; Ling Chen; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Jim C Hu; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Patterns of Specialty-Based Referral and Perioperative Outcomes for Women With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Ling Chen; Lisa Gabor; William M Burke; Ana I Tergas; June Y Hou; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Rural-urban differences in surgical treatment, regional lymph node examination, and survival in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Katherine S Hyon; Paula Diaz-Sylvester; Sonya R Izadi; Graham A Colditz; Laurent Brard
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Assessment of Cancer Survivorship Training and Knowledge Among Resident Physicians in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors:  Jared Lee; Johnny Galli; John Siemon; Marilyn Huang; Matthew Schlumbrecht
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Adherence of Primary Care Physicians to Evidence-Based Recommendations to Reduce Ovarian Cancer Mortality.

Authors:  Sherri L Stewart; Julie S Townsend; Mary C Puckett; Sun Hee Rim
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Referral patterns between high- and low-volume centers and associations with uterine cancer treatment and survival: a population-based study of Medicare, Medicaid, and privately insured women.

Authors:  Kemi M Doll; Ke Meng; Paola A Gehrig; Wendy R Brewster; Anne-Marie Meyer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.