Literature DB >> 25921235

Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic colo-rectal surgery for cancer at a tertiary center in a developing country: Egypt as an example.

Anwar Tawfik Amin1, Badawy M Ahmed2, Salah Mabrouk Khallaf3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy has been shown to have significant short- and long-term benefits compared to open approach. The incorporation of laparoscopy in developing countries is challenging, due to the high costs of equipment and lack of expertise. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer that could be performed in developing countries under different circumstances in developed countries.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (23 males and 14 females) with colorectal cancer with a median age of 46 years (39-72) have been enrolled for laparoscopic colo-rectal surgery in a tertiary center in Egypt (South Egypt Cancer Institute) with the trend of reuse of some disposable laparoscopic instruments.
RESULTS: The median operative time was 130 min (95-195 min). The median estimated blood loss was 70 ml (30-90 ml). No major intra-operative complications have been encountered. Two cases (5.5%) have been converted because of local advancement (one case) and bleeding with unavailability of vessel sealing device at that time (one case). The median time for passing flatus after surgery was 36 h (12-72 h). The median hospital stay was 4.8 days (4-7 days). The peri-operative period passed without events. Pathologic outcome revealed that the median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 14 (range 9-23 lymph node) and all cases had free surgical margin.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer in developing countries could be safe and feasible. Safe reuse of disposable expensive parts of some laparoscopic instruments could help in propagation of this technique in developing countries.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Laparoscopic colectomy; Laparoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25921235     DOI: 10.1016/j.jnci.2015.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Egypt Natl Canc Inst        ISSN: 1110-0362


  6 in total

Review 1.  A critical appraisal of the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for oncological and non-oncological resections.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Munir Ahmad Rathore; Mirza Khurrum Baig; Parv Sains
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-10

Review 2.  Practice, training and safety of laparoscopic surgery in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Maryam Alfa-Wali; Samuel Osaghae
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-27

Review 3.  Role of Digital Resources in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Training.

Authors:  Heidi Paine; Manish Chand
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-03-29

4.  Impact of a medical university on laparoscopic surgery in a service-oriented public hospital in the Caribbean.

Authors:  Shamir O Cawich; Suresh Pooran; Barbara Amow; Ernest Ali; Fawwaz Mohammed; Marlon Mencia; Samuel Ramsewak; Seetharaman Hariharan; Vijay Naraynsingh
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-11-16

Review 5.  Continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion for postoperative pain after midline laparotomy for colorectal resection in adults.

Authors:  Sophie S Liang; Andrew J Ying; Eshan T Affan; Benedict F Kakala; Giovanni Fm Strippoli; Alan Bullingham; Helen Currow; David W Dunn; Zeigfeld Yu-Ting Yeh
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-19

6.  First steps of laparoscopic surgery in a sub-Saharan African setting: a nine-month review at the Douala Gynaeco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital (Cameroon).

Authors:  J T Fouogue; F Y Fouelifack; J H Fouedjio; R Tchounzou; Z Sando; E T Mboudou
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2017-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.