Abin Kuruvilla Mathew1, Suzanne C Purdy2, David Welch3, Niels H Pontoppidan4, Filip Marchman Rønne4. 1. Discipline of Speech Science, School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: amat527@aucklanduni.ac.nz. 2. Discipline of Speech Science, School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 3. Section of Audiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 4. Eriksholm Research Centre, Denmark.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine behavioural and neural processing of pitch cues in adults with normal hearing (NH) and adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). METHODS: All participants completed a test of behavioural sensitivity to pitch cues using the TFS1 test (Moore and Sek, 2009a). Cortical potentials (N1, P2 and acoustic change complex) were recorded in response to frequency shifted (deltaF) tone complexes in an 'ABA' pattern. RESULTS: The SNHL group performed more poorly than the NH group for the TFS1 test. P2 was more reflective of pitch differences between the complexes than N1. The presence of acoustic change complex in response to the TFS transitions in the ABA stimulus varied with deltaF. Acoustic change complex amplitudes were reduced for the group with SNHL compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Behavioural performance and cortical responses reflect pitch processing depending on the salience of pitch cues. SIGNIFICANCE: These data support the use of cortical potentials and behavioural sensitivity tests to measure processing of complex acoustic cues in people with hearing loss. This approach has potential for evaluation of benefit from auditory training and hearing instrument digital signal processing strategies.
OBJECTIVES: To examine behavioural and neural processing of pitch cues in adults with normal hearing (NH) and adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). METHODS: All participants completed a test of behavioural sensitivity to pitch cues using the TFS1 test (Moore and Sek, 2009a). Cortical potentials (N1, P2 and acoustic change complex) were recorded in response to frequency shifted (deltaF) tone complexes in an 'ABA' pattern. RESULTS: The SNHL group performed more poorly than the NH group for the TFS1 test. P2 was more reflective of pitch differences between the complexes than N1. The presence of acoustic change complex in response to the TFS transitions in the ABA stimulus varied with deltaF. Acoustic change complex amplitudes were reduced for the group with SNHL compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Behavioural performance and cortical responses reflect pitch processing depending on the salience of pitch cues. SIGNIFICANCE: These data support the use of cortical potentials and behavioural sensitivity tests to measure processing of complex acoustic cues in people with hearing loss. This approach has potential for evaluation of benefit from auditory training and hearing instrument digital signal processing strategies.
Authors: Robert P Carlyon; François Guérit; John M Deeks; Andrew Harland; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Simone R de Rijk; Manohar Bance Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2021-01-25
Authors: Francois Guérit; John C Middlebrooks; Matthew L Richardson; Akshat Arneja; Andrew J Harland; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Robert P Carlyon Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2022-06-13