Literature DB >> 25920653

Total hip arthroplasty using a short-stem prosthesis: restoration of hip anatomy.

Tomas Amenabar1, Kanniraj Marimuthu2, Gabrielle Hawdon2, Alessandro Gildone2, Stephen McMahon2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate hip parameters such as vertical centre of rotation (VCR), horizontal centre of rotation (HCR), femoral offset, and leg length after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the Nanos short-stem prosthesis.
METHODS: Medical records of 73 men and 74 women aged 25 to 92 (mean, 63) years who underwent THA using the Nanos short-stem prosthesis by a single surgeon were reviewed. Prior to the surgery, the optimal cup and stem size, head length, and level of the neck osteotomy were determined using radiographs. Intra-operatively, the leg length and femoral offset were checked, and the level of neck resection and head length were adjusted. VCR, HCR, femoral offset, and leg length of the operated and contralateral sides were compared. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS).
RESULTS: Compared with the normal contralateral hips, the operated hips had a mean increase of 0.4 mm in VCR (p=0.032), a mean decrease of 1.4 mm in HCR (p=0.027), a mean increase of 0.6 mm in femoral offset (p=0.043), and a mean increase of 0.36 mm in leg length (p=0.035). For these respective parameters, the difference between the normal contralateral side and the operated side was within 5 mm in 89%, 80%, 71%, and 96% of patients. The HHS improved from a mean of 53 to 91 at one year (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: THA using the Nanos short-stem prosthesis enabled restoration of hip anatomy (VCR, HCR, femoral offset, and leg length).

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty, replacement, hip; hip prosthesis; leg length inequality

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25920653     DOI: 10.1177/230949901502300121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  6 in total

1.  Short stems reproduce femoral offset better than standard stems in total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study.

Authors:  Roger Erivan; Anne-Sophie Muller; Guillaume Villatte; Stéphane Millerioux; Aurélien Mulliez; Stéphane Boisgard; Stéphane Descamps
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of two different stems for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pedram Yavari; Bahareh Baghchi; Mehdi Tavassoli; Pouya Moshkdar; Sepehr Eslami; Amirhossein Sadeghian; Ghasem Mohammadsharifi
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-06-15

3.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes with the Nanos™ short-stem hip implant at 24 months: A prospective, single-center study.

Authors:  Stefan Budde; Michael Schwarze; Thilo Floerkemeier; Jochen Plagge; Nils Wirries; Henning Windhagen; Fritz Thorey; Alexander Derksen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-06

4.  Machine learning techniques for the optimization of joint replacements: Application to a short-stem hip implant.

Authors:  Myriam Cilla; Edoardo Borgiani; Javier Martínez; Georg N Duda; Sara Checa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prospective Short-Term and Return-to-Sports Results of a Novel Uncemented Short-Stem Hip Prosthesis with Metaphyseal Anchorage.

Authors:  Robert Breuer; Rainer Fiala; Nina Schrenk; Thomas M Tiefenboeck
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Femoroacetabular offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty; Digital templating a short stem vs a conventional stem.

Authors:  Sheryl de Waard; Tom Verboom; Niels Hendrik Bech; Inger N Sierevelt; Gino M Kerkhoffs; Daniël Haverkamp
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.