| Literature DB >> 25918725 |
Katharina Leitmeyer1, Andrea Glutz1, Vesna Radojevic1, Cristian Setz1, Nathan Huerzeler1, Helen Bumann1, Daniel Bodmer1, Yves Brand1.
Abstract
Rapamycin is an antifungal agent with immunosuppressive properties. Rapamycin inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) by blocking the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1). mTOR is an atypical serine/threonine protein kinase, which controls cell growth, cell proliferation, and cell metabolism. However, less is known about the mTOR pathway in the inner ear. First, we evaluated whether or not the two mTOR complexes (mTORC1 and mTORC2, resp.) are present in the mammalian cochlea. Next, tissue explants of 5-day-old rats were treated with increasing concentrations of rapamycin to explore the effects of rapamycin on auditory hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons. Auditory hair cell survival, spiral ganglion neuron number, length of neurites, and neuronal survival were analyzed in vitro. Our data indicates that both mTOR complexes are expressed in the mammalian cochlea. We observed that inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin results in a dose dependent damage of auditory hair cells. Moreover, spiral ganglion neurite number and length of neurites were significantly decreased in all concentrations used compared to control in a dose dependent manner. Our data indicate that the mTOR may play a role in the survival of hair cells and modulates spiral ganglion neuronal outgrowth and neurite formation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25918725 PMCID: PMC4395993 DOI: 10.1155/2015/925890
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Representative western blots of raptor and rictor. Cochleae were either exposed for 24 hours to control media (control) or media containing rapamycin (10 μM or 100 μM, resp.). Brain tissue served as positive control. β-actin was used as an internal control.
Figure 2Effect of rapamycin on auditory HCs by cochlear turns. Photograph of anti-myosin VIIa-labeled OCs. Scale bar 20 μm. (a–f) Untreated OCs (control) and OCs exposed to 10 μM rapamycin demonstrate three rows of OHCs and a single row of IHCs in all cochlear turns. (g–l) OCs treated with increasing concentrations of rapamycin (50 μM and 100 μM, resp.) show a dose dependent loss of OHCs and IHCs.
Figure 3Quantitative analysis of surviving OHCs and IHCs treated with rapamycin by cochlear turns. (a) Average surviving OHCs and IHCs in the apical turn with increasing concentrations of rapamycin compared to control. (b) Average surviving OHCs and IHCs in the middle turn with increasing concentrations of rapamycin compared to control. (c) Average surviving OHCs and IHCs in the basal turn with increasing concentrations of rapamycin compared to control. There was a dose dependent statistically significant decrease in IHC and OHC survival in OCs treated with increasing concentrations of rapamycin in all cochlear turns. Asterisks indicate significant difference compared to control (P < 0.05). Data are expressed as the mean number of surviving OHCs and IHCs corresponding to 20 IHCs. Vertical lines represent one standard deviation. n = 6 for each experimental condition.
Figure 4Effect of rapamycin on SG explants and their supporting cells. (a–c) Representative SG explants stained with anti-200 kDa neurofilament antibody after treatment with DMSO (control), 10 μM rapamycin, and 100 μM rapamycin. Scale bar 300 μm. (d) Average number of SG neurites observed per SG explant. The numbers of neurites observed in control samples are compared to those seen with two different concentrations of rapamycin. Rapamycin-treated samples showed significantly less SG neurites per SG explant compared to control in both concentrations used. (e) Average length of SG neurites observed on SG explants. The lengths of neurites observed in control samples are compared to those seen with two different concentrations of rapamycin. Rapamycin-treated samples were significantly shorter in the highest rapamycin concentrations used. (f) Average area of supporting cells observed around SG explants. Rapamycin treatment resulted in significantly smaller area of supporting cells around the SG explant compared to control samples in both concentrations used. Asterisks denote statistical difference compared to control (P < 0.05). Data are represented as mean. Vertical lines represent one standard deviation. n = 20 for each experimental condition.
Figure 5Effects of rapamycin on SG neuronal survival. (a-b) Representative SG explants after treatment with DMSO only (control) and rapamycin 100 μM. (c) Rapamycin treatment did not show a difference in SGN survival compared to controls (P > 0.05). Scale bar 100 μm. Data are represented as mean. Vertical lines represent one standard deviation. n = 8 for each experimental condition.