Literature DB >> 25917065

Nurse-led clinics can manage faecal incontinence effectively: results from a tertiary referral centre.

J Duelund-Jakobsen1, S Haas1, S Buntzen1, L Lundby1, G Bøje1, S Laurberg1.   

Abstract

AIM: In May 2010, a specialist nurse-initiated assessment and treatment algorithm for faecal incontinence (FI) was introduced at the department of Anal Physiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of and patient satisfaction with the program.
METHOD: A medical file audit was preformed on patients evaluated and treated for FI and discharged after September 2010. Patients were invited to participate in a structured telephone interview. This study aimed to enrol 100 patients. Patients were asked if they were satisfied with their current level of continence status (yes/no), and a numerical satisfaction score and Wexner score were recorded. These results were compared to baseline and at time of discharge.
RESULTS: One-hundred patients completed the telephone interview; 73 of these patients were satisfied after a median of 420 (range: 114-586) days following discharge from the program. A median of one outpatient consultation followed by one telephone follow-up was required before the patients were discharged. The Wexner score was significantly reduced by 3.9 (±4.4) (P < 0.001) points among the satisfied and non-significantly reduced by 0.52 (± 3.3) (P = 0.42) points among the dissatisfied patients at follow-up compared to baseline. The satisfied and dissatisfied patients at follow-up did not differ in baseline characteristics including Wexner score.
CONCLUSIONS: FI can successively be evaluated and conservatively managed by specialist nurses, and these nurses achived high satisfaction rates among their patients. The concept of specialist nurse-led clinics will reduce waiting lists, and descrease the number of patients needing to be evaluated by a surgeon. Colorectal Disease
© 2015 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Faecal incontinence; conservative therapy; patient satisfaction; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25917065     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  6 in total

1.  Patient Satisfaction With Nurse-Led Telephone Follow-up in an Ambulatory Setting.

Authors:  Megan O Schimpf; Dee E Fenner; Tovia M Smith; Julie Tucker; Mitchell B Berger
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.091

2.  Conservative treatment of severe defecatory urgency and fecal incontinence: minor strategies with major impact.

Authors:  Yolanda Ribas; Arantxa Muñoz-Duyos
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Prospective evaluation of transanal irrigation for fecal incontinence and constipation.

Authors:  T Juul; P Christensen
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Management of patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Jakob Duelund-Jakobsen; Jonas Worsoe; Lilli Lundby; Peter Christensen; Klaus Krogh
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.409

5.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence - efficacy confirmed from a two-centre prospectively maintained database.

Authors:  Jakob Duelund-Jakobsen; Paul-Antoine Lehur; Lilli Lundby; Vincent Wyart; Søren Laurberg; Steen Buntzen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Women's experiences of managing digitation: do we ask enough in primary care?

Authors:  Sharon Eustice; Ruth Endacott; Jenny Morris; Rohit Shankar; Bridie Kent
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2018-08-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.