Literature DB >> 28550422

Prospective evaluation of transanal irrigation for fecal incontinence and constipation.

T Juul1,2, P Christensen3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of transanal irrigation on bowel function and quality of life in a prospective cohort of Danish patients with fecal incontinence or constipation.
METHODS: Patients with fecal incontinence or constipation of heterogeneous origin were treated by a specialist nurse at the Anal Physiology Clinic/Department of Surgery at Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. If satisfactory results were not obtained after conservative bowel management, patients were instructed in the use the transanal irrigation procedure and were consecutively recruited for this observational cohort study in the period from March 2010 to September 2013. Patients completed questionnaires regarding bowel function, quality of life and the transanal irrigation procedure at baseline and after 12 months.
RESULTS: A total of 507 were introduced to transanal irrigation. Eighty-three percent were females. The median age was 56 (range 19-86) years. At follow-up, 216 (43%) patients still used transanal irrigation, 174 (34%) reported that they had discontinued the treatment for various reasons, while no response was obtained from the remaining 117 (23%) patients. The main reason for not adhering to the treatment was an unsatisfactory outcome, which was reported by 86 (49.4%) of those who discontinued the treatment. Among patients still using the procedure at follow-up, a statistically significant improvement of bowel function scores (St. Marks/Wexner incontinence score, Wexner constipation score and obstructed defecation syndrome score) was detected: the Wexner incontinence score decreased from 12.4 at baseline to 10.2 at follow-up (p < 0.001); the St. Marks incontinence score decreased from 14.9 to 12.7 (p < 0.001); the Wexner constipation score decreased from 14.3 to 12.4 (p < 0.001); and the obstructed defecation syndrome score also dropped, from 15.1 to 11.8 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the influence of bowel dysfunction on daily activities and quality of life diminished significantly, while the general satisfaction with bowel function increased significantly (p < 0.001 in all three measures).
CONCLUSIONS: Bowel function and quality of life improved in the group of patients adhering to transanal irrigation after 12 months. However, more than one-third of the patients discontinued the treatment within the first year with transanal irrigation. Thus, further studies are needed in order to identify factors predicting success and failure with this treatment and to improve supervision during initiation and follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bowel dysfunction; Constipation; Fecal incontinence; Quality of life; Transanal irrigation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28550422     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1635-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  31 in total

1.  Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Long-term follow-up of retrograde colonic irrigation for defaecation disturbances.

Authors:  M P Gosselink; M Darby; D D E Zimmerman; A A A Smits; I van Kessel; W C Hop; J W Briel; W R Schouten
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; E Carapeti; J A Cahill; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Faecal incontinence: Current knowledges and perspectives.

Authors:  Alban Benezech; Michel Bouvier; Véronique Vitton
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 5.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alexandra K Macmillan; Arend E H Merrie; Roger J Marshall; Bryan R Parry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 7.  Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter D R Higgins; John F Johanson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients.

Authors:  F Agachan; T Chen; J Pfeifer; P Reissman; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Long-term outcome and safety of transanal irrigation for constipation and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Peter Christensen; Klaus Krogh; Steen Buntzen; Fariborz Payandeh; Søren Laurberg
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Epidemiology of constipation in Europe and Oceania: a systematic review.

Authors:  George Peppas; Vangelis G Alexiou; Eleni Mourtzoukou; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  8 in total

1.  Short versus mid-long-term outcome of transanal irrigation in children with spina bifida and anorectal malformations.

Authors:  Emanuele Ausili; A Marte; G Brisighelli; P Midrio; G Mosiello; E La Pergola; L Lombardi; B D Iacobelli; E Caponcelli; M Meroni; E Leva; C Rendeli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Adherence to transanal irrigation in older adults: first-year assessment.

Authors:  C Chesnel; C Hentzen; R Haddad; A Charlanes; F Le Breton; N Turmel; G Amarenco
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Teaching TransAnal Irrigation (TAI): why it is mandatory.

Authors:  G Gallo; S Graziani; A Realis Luc; G Clerico; M Trompetto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of Faecal Incontinence-A UEG/ESCP/ESNM/ESPCG collaboration.

Authors:  Sadé L Assmann; Daniel Keszthelyi; Jos Kleijnen; Foteini Anastasiou; Elissa Bradshaw; Ann E Brannigan; Emma V Carrington; Giuseppe Chiarioni; Liora D A Ebben; Marc A Gladman; Yasuko Maeda; Jarno Melenhorst; Giovanni Milito; Jean W M Muris; Julius Orhalmi; Daniel Pohl; Yvonne Tillotson; Mona Rydningen; Saulius Svagzdys; Carolynne J Vaizey; Stephanie O Breukink
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 6.866

5.  Use of a new transanal irrigation device for bowel disorder management by patients familiar with the irrigation technique: a prospective, interventional, multicenter pilot study.

Authors:  K Charvier; V Bonniaud; D Waz; C Desprez; A-M Leroi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome - the MANUEL project.

Authors:  Peter Christensen; Coen Im Baeten; Eloy Espín-Basany; Jacopo Martellucci; Karen P Nugent; Frank Zerbib; Gianluca Pellino; Harald Rosen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Transanal Irrigation for Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Maëlys Teng; Gabriel Miget; Mirella Moutounaïck; Florian Kervinio; Audrey Charlanes; Camille Chesnel; Frédérique Le Breton; Gérard Amarenco
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

8.  Mechanical colon cleansing device in patients with chronic constipation: An experimental study.

Authors:  Mahdi Alemrajabi; Seyedeh Fahimeh Shojae; Mohammad Moradi; Amin Dehghanian; Amirreza Ehsani; Seyed Soroosh Valinia
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2021-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.