Literature DB >> 25916567

P-wave duration and the risk of atrial fibrillation: Results from the Copenhagen ECG Study.

Jonas B Nielsen1, Jørgen T Kühl2, Adrian Pietersen3, Claus Graff4, Bent Lind3, Johannes J Struijk4, Morten S Olesen5, Moritz F Sinner6, Troels N Bachmann5, Stig Haunsø7, Børge G Nordestgaard8, Patrick T Ellinor9, Jesper H Svendsen7, Klaus F Kofoed2, Lars Køber2, Anders G Holst5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Results on the association between P-wave duration and the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) are conflicting.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to obtain a detailed description of the relationship between P-wave duration and the risk of AF.
METHODS: Using computerized analysis of electrocardiograms from a large primary care population, we evaluated the association between P-wave duration and the risk of AF. Secondary end-points were death from cardiovascular causes and putative ischemic stroke. Data on drug use, comorbidity, and outcomes were collected from administrative registries.
RESULTS: A total of 285,933 individuals were included. During median follow-up period of 6.7 years, 9550 developed AF, 9371 died of a cardiovascular cause, and 8980 had a stroke. Compared with the reference group (100-105 ms), individuals with very short (≤89 ms; hazard ratio [HR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-1.81), intermediate (112-119 ms; HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.13-1.31), long (120-129 ms; HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.39-1.62), and very long P-wave duration (≥130 ms; HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.89-2.23) had an increased risk of incident AF. With respect to death from cardiovascular causes, we found an increased risk for very short (≤89 ms; HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.06-1.34), long (120-129 ms; HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.19), and very long P-wave duration (≥130 ms; HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.21-1.40) compared with the reference group (106-111 ms). Similar but weaker associations were found between P-wave duration and the risk of putative ischemic stroke.
CONCLUSION: In a large primary care population we found both short and long P-wave duration to be robustly associated with an increased risk of AF.
Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Death; Electrocardiography; P-wave; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25916567     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  38 in total

1.  The clinical utility of normal findings on noninvasive cardiac assessment in the prediction of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sanjay Venkatesh; Wesley T O'Neal; Stephen T Broughton; Amit J Shah; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Intra- and interatrial conduction abnormalities: hemodynamic and arrhythmic significance.

Authors:  Nicolas Johner; Mehdi Namdar; Dipen C Shah
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  P-wave vector magnitude predicts recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yosuke Nakatani; Tamotsu Sakamoto; Yoshiaki Yamaguchi; Yasushi Tsujino; Naoya Kataoka; Koichiro Kinugawa
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  New electrocardiographic score for the prediction of atrial fibrillation: The MVP ECG risk score (morphology-voltage-P-wave duration).

Authors:  Bryce Alexander; Julia Milden; Bachar Hazim; Sohaib Haseeb; Antoni Bayes-Genis; Roberto Elosua; Manuel Martínez-Sellés; Cynthia Yeung; Wilma Hopman; Antoni Bayes de Luna; Adrian Baranchuk
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Anticoagulation in patients at high risk of stroke without documented atrial fibrillation. Time for a paradigm shift?

Authors:  Antoni Bayés de Luna; Adrian Baranchuk; Manuel Martínez-Sellés; Pyotr G Platonov
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Rationale and design of the BAYES (Interatrial Block and Yearly Events) registry.

Authors:  Manuel Martínez-Sellés; Adrian Baranchuk; Roberto Elosua; Antonio Bayés de Luna
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Association of vitamin D deficiency with electrocardiographic markers of left atrial abnormalities.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Anees; Muhammad Imtiaz Ahmad; Parag A Chevli; Yabing Li; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Fifteen Genetic Loci Associated With the Electrocardiographic P Wave.

Authors:  Ingrid E Christophersen; Jared W Magnani; Xiaoyan Yin; John Barnard; Lu-Chen Weng; Dan E Arking; Maartje N Niemeijer; Steven A Lubitz; Christy L Avery; Qing Duan; Stephan B Felix; Joshua C Bis; Kathleen F Kerr; Aaron Isaacs; Martina Müller-Nurasyid; Christian Müller; Kari E North; Alex P Reiner; Lesley F Tinker; Jan A Kors; Alexander Teumer; Astrid Petersmann; Moritz F Sinner; Petra Buzkova; Jonathan D Smith; David R Van Wagoner; Uwe Völker; Melanie Waldenberger; Annette Peters; Thomas Meitinger; Marian C Limacher; Kirk C Wilhelmsen; Bruce M Psaty; Albert Hofman; Andre Uitterlinden; Bouwe P Krijthe; Zhu-Ming Zhang; Renate B Schnabel; Stefan Kääb; Cornelia van Duijn; Jerome I Rotter; Nona Sotoodehnia; Marcus Dörr; Yun Li; Mina K Chung; Elsayed Z Soliman; Alvaro Alonso; Eric A Whitsel; Bruno H Stricker; Emelia J Benjamin; Susan R Heckbert; Patrick T Ellinor
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2017-08

Review 9.  Electrocardiogram (ECG) for the Prediction of Incident Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview.

Authors:  Yoshifusa Aizawa; Hiroshi Watanabe; Ken Okumura
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-12-31

Review 10.  Atrial Fibrillation Predictors: Importance of the Electrocardiogram.

Authors:  David M German; Muammar M Kabir; Thomas A Dewland; Charles A Henrikson; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 1.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.