| Literature DB >> 25915602 |
Elisa Rossi1, Daniela Basso2, Carlo-Federico Zambon1, Filippo Navaglia2, Eliana Greco1, Michela Pelloso1, Serena Artuso3, Andrea Padoan1, Matilde Pescarin3, Ada Aita1, Dania Bozzato1, Stefania Moz1, Mara Cananzi3, Graziella Guariso3, Mario Plebani4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: TNF-α and IFN-γ play a role in the development of mucosal damage in celiac disease (CD). Polymorphisms of TNFA and IFNG genes, as well as of the TNFRSF1A gene, encoding the TNF-α receptor 1, might underlie different inter-individual disease susceptibility over a common HLA risk background. The aims of this study were to ascertain whether five SNPs in the TNFA promoter (-1031T>C,-857C>T,-376G>A,-308G>A,-238G>A), sequence variants of the TNFRSF1A gene and IFNG +874A>T polymorphism are associated with CD in a HLA independent manner.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25915602 PMCID: PMC4411089 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patients’ details and clinicopathological characteristics.
| CD | Controls | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 244 | 267 |
|
| 167 (68%) | 146 (55%) |
|
| 7±4 | 10±4 |
|
| 1–23 | 0.5–19 |
|
| ||
|
| 19 | 167 |
|
| 0 / 0 | 17 / 6 |
|
| 3 / 0 / 1 | 24 / 11 / 1 |
|
| 4 / 0 | 19 / 12 |
|
| 149 / 68 | 9 / 1 |
|
| ||
|
| 0 | 262 |
|
| 9 | 5 |
|
| 16 | 0 |
|
| 219 (3a = 34, 3b = 51, 3c = 134) | 0 |
|
| 12 | 50 |
|
| 153±79 | 5±9 |
CD, celiac disease
a Chi-square test: 10.17, p = 0.001
b Student’s t test for unpaired data: t = 7.13, p<0.0001
c Chi-square test: 20.09, p<0.0001
d Student’s t test for unpaired data: t = 30.14, p<0.0001
HLA haplotype and CD risk.
| HLA |
|
| Total, Nr. | Cases, Nr.(frequency) | Controls, Nr.(frequency) | OR (95%CI) | p-value | Adjusted p-value | Risk of CD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Any | X/X | 159 | 1 (0.01) | 158 (0.99) | Ref. | - | - | 1:18216 |
|
| *03/any | *0302/X | 24 | 7 (0.29) | 17 (0.71) | 83 (9–742) |
|
| 1:450 |
|
| *05 neg | *02/X | 27 | 8 (0.30) | 19 (0.70) | 63 (7–547) |
|
| 1:429 |
|
| *03/*05 neg | *0302/*02 | 8 | 3 (0.37) | 5 (0.63) | 104 (8–1375) |
|
| 1:313 |
|
| *05/any | *02/X | 162 | 104 (0.64) | 58 (0.36) | 284 (38–2107) |
|
| 1:103 |
|
| *03/*05 | *0302/*02 | 14 | 10 (0.71) | 4 (0.29) | 585 (52–6523) |
|
| 1:75 |
|
| *05 neg | *02/*02 | 9 | 7 (0.78) | 2 (0.22) | 664 (50–8790) |
|
| 1:52 |
|
| *05/any | *02/*02 | 108 | 104 (0.96) | 4 (0.04) | 4422 (474–41281) |
|
| 1:7 |
p values in boldface are significant
aX = any HLA-DQB1 allele different from *02 or *0302
bOR = Odds Ratio; 95%CI = 95% Confidence Intervals. Odds Ratios were calculated by binary logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and H. pylori infection
c Risk of CD is expressed as 1:N, where N is the number of individuals among which one case is present. Considering a disease prevalence of 1:184 in the general population [37], for each HLA-DQ category, N is calculated as a percentage of controls with that particular HLA-DQ status multiplied by 184 and divided by percentage of patients with the same DQ typing [10].
TNFA, IFNG and TNFRSF1A gene polymorphisms in CD.
| Gene | dbSNP | MAF | Genotypes | Cases | Controls | Dominant model | Recessive model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (freq) | n (freq) | p-value (2df) | OR | p-value (2df) | OR | ||||
|
| -1031T>C | C (0.027) | C/C | 9 (0.04) | 22 (0.08) |
| 0.65(0.44–0.95) |
| 0.41 (0.17–0.97) |
| T/C | 73 (0.30) | 97 (0.36) | |||||||
| T/T | 162 (0.66) | 148 (0.56) | |||||||
| -857C>T | T (0.153) | T/T | 3 (0.01) | 8 (0.03) |
| 0.42 (0.27–0.65) | 0.316 | 0.48 (0.12–2.01) | |
| C/T | 45 (0.19) | 89 (0.33) | |||||||
| C/C | 196 (0.8) | 170 (0.64) | |||||||
| -376G>A | A (0.047) | A/A | 2 (0.01) | 0 (-) |
| 2.25 (1.12–4.51) | - | - | |
| G/A | 28 (0.11) | 16 (0.06) | |||||||
| G/G | 214 (0.88) | 251 (0.94) | |||||||
| -308G>A | A (0.216) | A/A | 20 (0.08) | 3 (0.01) |
| 4.76 (3.12–7.26) |
| 10.09 (2.71–37.55) | |
| G/A | 117 (0.48) | 58 (0.22) | |||||||
| G/G | 107 (0.44) | 206 (0.77) | |||||||
| -238G>A | A (0.068) | A/A | 2 (0.01) | 1 (0.01) | 0.241 | 1.41 (0.80–2.46) | 0.841 | 1.28 (0.11–14.67) | |
| G/A | 34 (0.14) | 29 (0.11) | |||||||
| G/G | 208 (0.85) | 237 (0.88) | |||||||
|
| +874A>T | T (0.458) | T/T | 52 (0.21) | 56 (0.21) | 0.929 | 0.98 (0.65–1.48) | 0.810 | 1.06 (0.67–1.68) |
| A/T | 116 (0.48) | 136 (0.51) | |||||||
| A/A | 76 (0.31) | 75 (0.28) | |||||||
|
| c.625+10A>G | A (0.363) | G/G | 17 (0.33) | 26 (0.39) | 0.739 | 1.16 (0.47–2.76) | 0.061 | 0.21 (0.04–1.07) |
| G/A | 32 (0.63) | 31 (0.47) | |||||||
| A/A | 2 (0.04) | 9 (0.14) | |||||||
p values in boldface are significant
aMAF = minor allele frequency
bCases: n = 244; n = 51 for TNFRSF1A
cControls: n = 267; n = 66 for TNFRSF1A
dOR = Odds Ratio; 95%CI = 95% Confidence Intervals. Odds Ratios were calculated by binary logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and H. pylori infection.
Binary logistic regression analysis.
| OR | 95%CI | p-value | Adjusted p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| Ref | |||
|
| 178 | 24–1317 |
|
|
|
| 2752 | 287–26387 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Ref | |||
|
| 5 | 1–28 |
| 0.490 |
|
| 11 | 2–65 |
| 0.110 |
|
| 13 | 2–70 |
|
|
|
| 13 | 2–104 |
| 0.160 |
|
| 0.0055 | 0.0004–0.07 |
| - |
Outcome variable: CD diagnosis; Predictor variables: HLA-DQ haplotypes, TNFA haplotype combinations.
p values in boldface are significant
a OR = Odds Ratio; Odds Ratios were calculated by binary logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and H. pylori infection
bBonferroni’s adjusted p-values for multiple testing
cHLA-Q8, HLA-B2 hetero, HLA-DQ8/B1*02 pos, HLA-DQ2.5 hetero, HLA-DQ2/DQ8, HLA-B2 homo.
Fig 1HLA-DQ and TNFA haplotype combinations predict CD risk.
The marginal probability of CD was estimated on the basis of the multivariate binary logistic regression model reported in Table 4 adjusted for age, gender and H. pylori infection. Reference was the group of patients with negative HLA-DQ and TNFA group A haplotype combination. Dots and bars represent the estimated CD probability with their respective Bonferroni’s adjusted standard errors.
*: p<0.05 for all groups with respect to TNFA Group A and p<0.05 for TNFA Group D with respect to TNFA Group B (pairwise comparisons of marginal linear predictions).
Fig 2TNFRSF1A polymorphism affects serum TNF-α levels.
Serum TNF-α in controls and CD patients (upper panel) and in patients subdivided according to the TNFRSF1Ac.625+10A>G (rs1800693) polymorphism (lower panel).