Literature DB >> 25914417

Screening Performance and Costs of Different Strategies in Prenatal Screening for Trisomy 21.

K O Kagan1, M Schmid2, M Hoopmann1, P Wagner1, H Abele1.   

Abstract

Objective: Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) testing has opened new options in prenatal screening for trisomy 21. Due to the higher costs of cffDNA testing there is an ongoing debate on how to combine different screening strategies.
Methods: For this study, a model-based approach was used to evaluate all births in Germany in 2012 together with the percentage of euploid and trisomic pregnancies. Detection rates (DR), false positive rates (FPR), the costs of different screening strategies for trisomy 21 and combinations of these strategies were compared. The number of fetuses with trisomy 21 at 12 + 0 weeks of gestation was estimated based on maternal age distribution. We examined the screening performance of a screening strategy based on maternal age, first trimester screening (FTS) and cffDNA testing as well as the combinations "maternal age and cffDNA" and "FTS and cffDNA".
Results: In 2012 673 544 children were born. Median maternal age at delivery was 30.2 years (25th-75th quartile: 27.0-34.0). Based on maternal age distribution the expected number of fetuses with trisomy 21 at 12 weeks' gestation was 1788. Our study population therefore consisted of 675 332 pregnancies. Screening based only on maternal age or FTS or cffDNA resulted in detection rates of 63.3 %, 92.2 % and 99.0 % and false positive rates of 21.8 %, 8.0 % and 0.1 %, respectively. When maternal age was combined with cffDNA, cffDNA testing was only offered to women over a certain age; if a cut-off of 30 years was used, this resulted in a DR of 85.2 % and a FPR of 1.7 %. If primary screening consisted of FTS with cffDNA testing only done when the risk was between 1 : 10 and 1 : 1000, the detection rate was 96.7 % and the false positive rate was 1.2 %.
Conclusion: In this model-based study we showed that prenatal screening for trisomy 21 can be improved even more by combining FTS and cffDNA. Further studies are necessary to examine whether these results can be reproduced in reality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell-free fetal DNA; first trimester screening; screening; trisomy

Year:  2015        PMID: 25914417      PMCID: PMC4397935          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  17 in total

1.  Maternal age- and gestation-specific risk for trisomy 21.

Authors:  R J Snijders; K Sundberg; W Holzgreve; G Henry; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  A model for a new pyramid of prenatal care based on the 11 to 13 weeks' assessment.

Authors:  Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Impact of introducing a national policy for prenatal Down syndrome screening on the diagnostic invasive procedure rate in England.

Authors:  S Morgan; A Delbarre; P Ward
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Assessment of Foetal DNA in Maternal Blood - A Useful Tool in the Hands of Prenatal Specialists.

Authors:  K O Kagan; M Hoopmann; P Kozlowski
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Screening for chromosomal abnormalities by first trimester combined screening and noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  K O Kagan; M Hoopmann; R Hammer; R Stressig; P Kozlowski
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.548

6.  The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in Dutch national health care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Lean Beulen; Janneke P C Grutters; Brigitte H Faas; Ilse Feenstra; John M G van Vugt; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Screening for trisomy 21 by maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A.

Authors:  K O Kagan; D Wright; A Baker; D Sahota; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Potential diagnostic consequences of applying non-invasive prenatal testing: population-based study from a country with existing first-trimester screening.

Authors:  O B Petersen; I Vogel; C Ekelund; J Hyett; A Tabor
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Impact of a new national screening policy for Down's syndrome in Denmark: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Charlotte K Ekelund; Finn Stener Jørgensen; Olav Bjørn Petersen; Karin Sundberg; Ann Tabor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-11-27

10.  The first 3,000 Non-Invasive Prenatal Tests (NIPT) with the Harmony test in Belgium and the Netherlands.

Authors:  P J Willems; H Dierickx; Es Vandenakker; D Bekedam; N Segers; K Deboulle; A Vereecken
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2014
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 2.  Non-invasive prenatal screening: A 20-year experience in Italy.

Authors:  Chiara Palka; Paolo Guanciali-Franchi; Elisena Morizio; Melissa Alfonsi; Marco Papponetti; Giulia Sabbatinelli; Giandomenico Palka; Giuseppe Calabrese; Peter Benn
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-05-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.