Literature DB >> 25913507

Impact of the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing of invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on tumours assessed as 'equivocal' for HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in-situ hybridization.

Gillian C Bethune1, Daniel Veldhuijzen van Zanten1, Rebecca F MacIntosh1, Daniel Rayson2, Tallal Younis2, Kara Thompson3, Penny J Barnes1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing guidelines include changes to HER2 in-situ hybridization (ISH) interpretation criteria. We conducted a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort of primary breast carcinomas to assess the impact of updated guidelines on HER2 classification and laboratory resource utilization, and to characterize the pathobiology of HER2 equivocal tumours. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 904 dual-probe HER2/chromosome enumeration probe (CEP17) FISH tests on invasive breast carcinomas were studied. Eighty-five (9.4%) cases had a classification change with the updated guidelines; 66 (7.3%) went from HER2-negative to -equivocal, 15 cases (1.7%) were reclassified as HER2-positive and four cases from HER2-equivocal to -negative. A subset of primary breast cancers, reported initially as HER2-negative but -equivocal by 2013 guidelines, was identified. Traditional pathological factors of this subset were compared to HER2-negative and -positive control cases. The three HER2 groups demonstrated statistically significant differences with respect to prognostic factors, including tumour size, grade and nodal involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: The updated HER2 testing guidelines will result in the reclassification of approximately 9.4% of primary breast cancers with uncertainty regarding the clinical impact of this reclassification in the majority of cases. Resource utilization will increase as a result of the recommendation for retesting.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HER2 testing; breast cancer; equivocal category; guidelines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25913507     DOI: 10.1111/his.12723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  18 in total

1.  Application of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline and the SISH technique for HER2 testing of breast cancer selects more patients for anti-HER2 treatment.

Authors:  António Polónia; Dina Leitão; Fernando Schmitt
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Tumor levels of the mediators of ErbB2-driven anoikis resistance correlate with breast cancer relapse in patients receiving trastuzumab-based therapies.

Authors:  Alexi Surette; Byong Hoon Yoo; Tallal Younis; Kara Matheson; Tarek Rameh; Jaime Snowdon; Gillian Bethune; Kirill V Rosen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 revised guidelines on HER2 results in breast core biopsies with invasive breast carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Wynton B Overcast; Jianying Zhang; Debra L Zynger; Gary H Tozbikian
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Assessment of dual-probe Her-2 fluorescent in situ hybridization in breast cancer by the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines produces more equivocal results than that by the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines.

Authors:  Xiao-Long Qian; Hannah Y Wen; Yi-Ling Yang; Feng Gu; Xiao-Jing Guo; Fang-Fang Liu; Lanjing Zhang; Xin-Min Zhang; Li Fu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Clinicopathologic features of breast cancer reclassified as HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization with alternative chromosome 17 probes.

Authors:  Kristen C Blanton; Allison M Deal; Kathleen A Kaiser-Rogers; Carey K Anders; Siobhan M O'Connor; Johann D Hertel; Benjamin C Calhoun
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 2.090

6.  New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of HER2 positive breast cancers.

Authors:  N Tchrakian; L Flanagan; J Harford; J M Gannon; C M Quinn
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Varga; Aurelia Noske
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The importance of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer: lesson from a brain metastasis case.

Authors:  Jingxian Ding; Pinghua Hu; Jun Chen; Xiaobo Wu; Yali Cao
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2016-09-12

9.  Mek activity is required for ErbB2 expression in breast cancer cells detached from the extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Iman A Khan; Byong H Yoo; Janusz Rak; Kirill V Rosen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-31

10.  TILGen: A Program to Investigate Immune Targets in Breast Cancer Patients - First Results on the Influence of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes.

Authors:  Franziska Würfel; Ramona Erber; Hanna Huebner; Alexander Hein; Michael P Lux; Sebastian Jud; Anita Kremer; Hannah Kranich; Andreas Mackensen; Lothar Häberle; Carolin C Hack; Claudia Rauh; Marius Wunderle; Paul Gaß; Shahrooz Rabizadeh; Anna-Lisa Brandl; Hanna Langemann; Bernhard Volz; Naiba Nabieva; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Diana Dudziak; Matthias W Beckmann; Arndt Hartmann; Peter A Fasching; Matthias Rübner
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.