Literature DB >> 25912285

Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding: Relative Population of Asymmetric and Symmetric GroEL:GroES Complexes.

Shubhasis Haldar1, Amit J Gupta1, Xiao Yan1, Goran Miličić1, F Ulrich Hartl2, Manajit Hayer-Hartl3.   

Abstract

The chaperonin GroEL, a cylindrical complex consisting of two stacked heptameric rings, and its lid-like cofactor GroES form a nano-cage in which a single polypeptide chain is transiently enclosed and allowed to fold unimpaired by aggregation. GroEL and GroES undergo an ATP-regulated interaction cycle that serves to close and open the folding cage. Recent reports suggest that the presence of non-native substrate protein alters the GroEL/ES reaction by shifting it from asymmetric to symmetric complexes. In the asymmetric reaction mode, only one ring of GroEL is GroES bound and the two rings function sequentially, coupled by negative allostery. In the symmetric mode, both GroEL rings are GroES bound and are folding active simultaneously. Here, we find that the results of assays based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer recently used to quantify symmetric complexes depend strongly on the fluorophore pair used. We therefore developed a novel assay based on fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy to accurately measure GroEL:GroES stoichiometry. This assay avoids fluorophore labeling of GroEL and the use of GroEL cysteine mutants. Our results show that symmetric GroEL:GroES2 complexes are substantially populated only in the presence of non-foldable model proteins, such as α-lactalbumin and α-casein, which "over-stimulate" the GroEL ATPase and uncouple the negative GroEL inter-ring allostery. In contrast, asymmetric complexes are dominant both in the absence of substrate and in the presence of foldable substrate proteins. Moreover, uncoupling of the GroEL rings and formation of symmetric GroEL:GroES2 complexes is suppressed at physiological ATP:ADP concentration. We conclude that the asymmetric GroEL:GroES complex represents the main folding active form of the chaperonin.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GroEL; GroES; chaperonin; fluorescence correlation spectroscopy; protein folding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25912285     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  13 in total

1.  Reconciling the controversy regarding the functional importance of bullet- and football-shaped GroE complexes.

Authors:  Lavi S Bigman; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Substrate protein dependence of GroEL-GroES interaction cycle revealed by high-speed atomic force microscopy imaging.

Authors:  Daisuke Noshiro; Toshio Ando
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Heat Shock Proteins Promote Cancer: It's a Protection Racket.

Authors:  Stuart K Calderwood; Jianlin Gong
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 4.  Chaperonin GroEL uses asymmetric and symmetric reaction cycles in response to the concentration of non-native substrate proteins.

Authors:  Ryo Iizuka; Takashi Funatsu
Journal:  Biophys Physicobiol       Date:  2016-04-22

Review 5.  Chloroplast Chaperonin: An Intricate Protein Folding Machine for Photosynthesis.

Authors:  Qian Zhao; Cuimin Liu
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2018-01-19

6.  HSP60 possesses a GTPase activity and mediates protein folding with HSP10.

Authors:  Tomoya Okamoto; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Ikuru Kudo; Kazuya Matsumoto; Masafumi Odaka; Ewa Grave; Hideaki Itoh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  GroEL actively stimulates folding of the endogenous substrate protein PepQ.

Authors:  Jeremy Weaver; Mengqiu Jiang; Andrew Roth; Jason Puchalla; Junjie Zhang; Hays S Rye
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Structural insight into the cooperation of chloroplast chaperonin subunits.

Authors:  Shijia Zhang; Huan Zhou; Feng Yu; Cuicui Bai; Qian Zhao; Jianhua He; Cuimin Liu
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 9.  Extracellular HSPs: The Complicated Roles of Extracellular HSPs in Immunity.

Authors:  Stuart K Calderwood; Jianlin Gong; Ayesha Murshid
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Formation of the chaperonin complex studied by 2D NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Toshio Takenaka; Takashi Nakamura; Saeko Yanaka; Maho Yagi-Utsumi; Mahesh S Chandak; Kazunobu Takahashi; Subhankar Paul; Koki Makabe; Munehito Arai; Koichi Kato; Kunihiro Kuwajima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.