Literature DB >> 25910386

Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.

Jacob Westfall1, Leaf Van Boven2, John R Chambers3, Charles M Judd1.   

Abstract

An important component of political polarization in the United States is the degree to which ordinary people perceive political polarization. We used over 30 years of national survey data from the American National Election Study to examine how the public perceives political polarization between the Democratic and Republican parties and between Democratic and Republican presidential candidates. People in the United States consistently overestimate polarization between the attitudes of Democrats and Republicans. People who perceive the greatest political polarization are most likely to report having been politically active, including voting, trying to sway others' political beliefs, and making campaign contributions. We present a 3-factor framework to understand ordinary people's perceptions of political polarization. We suggest that people perceive greater political polarization when they (a) estimate the attitudes of those categorized as being in the "opposing group"; (b) identify strongly as either Democrat or Republican; and (c) hold relatively extreme partisan attitudes-particularly when those partisan attitudes align with their own partisan political identity. These patterns of polarization perception occur among both Democrats and Republicans.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American National Election Study; attitudes; identities; polarization; political psychology; politics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25910386     DOI: 10.1177/1745691615569849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  16 in total

1.  Social sampling and expressed attitudes: Authenticity preference and social extremeness aversion lead to social norm effects and polarization.

Authors:  Gordon D A Brown; Stephan Lewandowsky; Zhihong Huang
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Interventions to reduce partisan animosity.

Authors:  Rachel Hartman; Will Blakey; Jake Womick; Chris Bail; Eli J Finkel; Hahrie Han; John Sarrouf; Juliana Schroeder; Paschal Sheeran; Jay J Van Bavel; Robb Willer; Kurt Gray
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-09-19

3.  Political violence and inaccurate metaperceptions.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lees
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Political orientation, moral foundations, and COVID-19 social distancing.

Authors:  Hammond Tarry; Valérie Vézina; Jacob Bailey; Leah Lopes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy.

Authors:  Jennifer C Cole; Phillip J Ehret; David K Sherman; Leaf Van Boven
Journal:  Clim Change       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.174

6.  Understanding and combating misperceived polarization.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lees; Mina Cikara
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  When the tables are turned: The effects of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election on in-group favoritism and out-group hostility.

Authors:  Burak Oc; Celia Moore; Michael R Bashshur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict.

Authors:  Joshua B Grubbs; Brandon Warmke; Justin Tosi; A Shanti James; W Keith Campbell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Seeing Red: Anger Increases How Much Republican Identification Predicts Partisan Attitudes and Perceived Polarization.

Authors:  Michaela Huber; Leaf Van Boven; Bernadette Park; William T Pizzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Alteration of Political Belief by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Caroline Chawke; Ryota Kanai
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.