| Literature DB >> 25909444 |
Wakene C Negassa1, Andrey K Guber2, Alexandra N Kravchenko2, Terence L Marsh3, Britton Hildebrandt3, Mark L Rivers4.
Abstract
Physical protection of soilEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25909444 PMCID: PMC4409378 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Average pore size distributions in the studied soil aggregate fractions.
The relative abundance is calculated as a ratio between the numbers of pore medial axes voxels and the total image voxels.
Summary of selected pore characteristics of the studied soil aggregate fractions.
| Fraction size, | Total porosity, | Image-based porosity(> 6.5 μm), | Weighted average pore diameter, | Maximum pore diameter, | Pore space connectivity, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mm | cm3 cm-3 | cm3 cm-3 | μm | μm | % |
|
| 0.562 | 0.405a | 104a | 568a | 99a |
|
| 0.532 | 0.410a | 56b | 348b | 99a |
|
| 0.547 | 0.120b | 11c | 107c | 60b |
|
| 0.566 | 0.045c | 10c | 36d | <1c |
|
| 0.577 | 0.036c | 10c | 29d | <1c |
*Means within the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other (p<0.05).
Fig 2Examples of the leaf images from a) the leaf in a sample prior to incubation, and the leaves after 120 days of incubation in the samples of b) intact 0.05–0.1 mm aggregate fraction, and c) intact 1.0–2.0 mm aggregate fraction.
Note that the large pores around the leaf in the 0.05–0.1 mm (b) have formed after the incubation when the samples were air-dried prior to the second scanning.
Fig 3Percent of the corn leaves decomposed during the 120 day incubation as determined by X-ray μCT image analysis.
Different letters within the intact group mark aggregate fractions significantly different from each other (p<0.05), while the differences among the aggregate fractions of the ground group were not statistically significant. The differences between the intact and ground aggregate fractions of <0.05 mm and 1.0–2.0 mm sizes were statistically significant (p<0.05) and are marked with **.
Fig 4Cumulative amount of the CO2-C emitted from the small (<0.1 mm) and large (0.1–2 mm) fractions with and without corn leaf during the 120 day incubation in intact and ground samples.
In all aggregate size fractions, both ground and intact, the CO-C emitted from the samples with leaves was significantly higher than that from the samples without leaves (p<0.05). In all aggregate size fractions, both with and without leaf, the CO-C emitted from the ground samples was significantly higher than that from the intact samples (p<0.05). The significant difference between the small and large aggregate fractions is marked with ** (p<0.05).
Fig 5Differences between C levels in the soil layers adjacent to the corn leaf in the samples of the studied aggregate fractions after 120-day incubations and initial soil C content in the studied aggregate fractions (S3 Table).
Cases when the intact and ground fractions are significantly different from each other are marked with ** (p<0.05). All differences except those marked with NS are significantly greater than zero (p<0.05).
Fig 6Distribution of the relative abundance of bacteria identified at the phylum level on decomposing corn leaves in intact and ground samples of 0.05–0.1 mm and 1–2 mm aggregate fractions after 14 day incubation.
The numbers above the columns represent values of Chao (top) and Shannon (bottom) diversity indexes with different letters following each index indicating statistically significant differences among the four studied groups (p<0.05).
Fig 7Principal coordinate analysis results based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarities from the decomposing corn leaves in intact and ground samples of 0.05–0.1 mm and 1–2 mm aggregate fractions after 14 day incubation.
Intact 0.05–0.1 and 1–2 mm fractions are significantly different from each other and from the ground fractions (p<0.05).
List of the bacteria OTUs (from the 100 most abundant ones) on decomposing corn leaves, the relative abundance of which was significantly different between the 1–2 mm aggregate fraction and the 0.05–0.1 mm aggregate fraction after 14 days of incubation (p<0.05).
| Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | Pore size comparisons |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| L>S |
|
|
|
|
|
| L>S |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| L>S |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| L>S |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| L>S |
|
|
|
|
|
| L>S |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| S>L |
|
|
|
|
|
| L>S |
The cases when relative abundance was higher in the large fraction are marked by ‘L>S’ in the Pore size comparisons column, while the cases when relative abundance was higher in the small fraction are marked by ‘S>L’. The list is from most to least abundant OTUs.
Fig 8Conceptual representation of pores with different functional properties on images of intact aggregate fractions of 1.0–2.0 mm (a) and 0.05–0.1 mm (b) at 50% water filled porosity.
Schematic locations of water menisci between the soil particles in the 1.0–2.0 mm aggregate fractions and pores likely filled with water are marked with blue. Pores likely filled with air in the 0.05–0.1 mm fraction are marked with red, while possible air passes in the 1.0–2.0 mm fraction are marked with red arrows.