Literature DB >> 25909147

Spectrum of Radiation-Induced Clustered Non-DSB Damage - A Monte Carlo Track Structure Modeling and Calculations.

Ritsuko Watanabe1, Shirin Rahmanian, Hooshang Nikjoo.   

Abstract

The aim of this report is to present the spectrum of initial radiation-induced cellular DNA damage [with particular focus on non-double-strand break (DSB) damage] generated by computer simulations. The radiation types modeled in this study were monoenergetic electrons (100 eV-1.5 keV), ultrasoft X-ray photons Ck, AlK and TiK, as well as some selected ions including 3.2 MeV/u proton; 0.74 and 2.4 MeV/u helium ions; 29 MeV/u nitrogen ions and 950 MeV/u iron ions. Monte Carlo track structure methods were used to simulate damage induction by these radiation types in a cell-mimetic condition from a single-track action. The simulations took into account the action of direct energy deposition events and the reaction of hydroxyl radicals on atomistic linear B-DNA segments of a few helical turns including the water of hydration. Our results permitted the following conclusions: a. The absolute levels of different types of damage [base damage, simple and complex single-strand breaks (SSBs) and DSBs] vary depending on the radiation type; b. Within each damage class, the relative proportions of simple and complex damage vary with radiation type, the latter being higher with high-LET radiations; c. Overall, for both low- and high-LET radiations, the ratios of the yields of base damage to SSBs are similar, being about 3.0 ± 0.2; d. Base damage contributes more to the complexity of both SSBs and DSBs, than additional SSB damage and this is true for both low- and high-LET radiations; and e. The average SSB/DSB ratio for low-LET radiations is about 18, which is about 5 times higher than that for high-LET radiations. The hypothesis that clustered DNA damage is more difficult for cells to repair has gained currency among radiobiologists. However, as yet, there is no direct in vivo experimental method to validate the dependence of kinetics of DNA repair on DNA damage complexity (both DSB and non-DSB types). The data on the detailed spectrum of DNA damage presented here, in particular the non-DSB type, provide a good basis for testing mechanistic models of DNA repair kinetics such as base excision repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25909147     DOI: 10.1667/RR13902.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  24 in total

1.  NEIL1 stimulates neurogenesis and suppresses neuroinflammation after stress.

Authors:  Beimeng Yang; David M Figueroa; Yujun Hou; Mansi Babbar; Stephanie L Baringer; Deborah L Croteau; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 7.376

2.  Cellular Response to Proton Irradiation: A Simulation Study with TOPAS-nBio.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhu; Aimee L McNamara; Stephen J McMahon; Jose Ramos-Mendez; Nicholas T Henthorn; Bruce Faddegon; Kathryn D Held; Joseph Perl; Junli Li; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Targeted and Off-Target (Bystander and Abscopal) Effects of Radiation Therapy: Redox Mechanisms and Risk/Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 4.  Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond.

Authors:  Antoni Rucinski; Anna Biernacka; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Fluorescence anisotropy study of radiation-induced DNA damage clustering based on FRET.

Authors:  Ken Akamatsu; Naoya Shikazono; Takeshi Saito
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.142

6.  Correlation of bistranded clustered abasic DNA lesion processing with structural and dynamic DNA helix distortion.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Bignon; Hugo Gattuso; Christophe Morell; François Dehez; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Antonio Monari; Elise Dumont
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Complex DNA Damage: A Route to Radiation-Induced Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Ifigeneia V Mavragani; Zacharenia Nikitaki; Maria P Souli; Asef Aziz; Somaira Nowsheen; Khaled Aziz; Emmy Rogakou; Alexandros G Georgakilas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  In Silico Non-Homologous End Joining Following Ion Induced DNA Double Strand Breaks Predicts That Repair Fidelity Depends on Break Density.

Authors:  N T Henthorn; J W Warmenhoven; M Sotiropoulos; R I Mackay; N F Kirkby; K J Kirkby; M J Merchant
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Complex DNA Damage Induced by High Linear Energy Transfer Alpha-Particles and Protons Triggers a Specific Cellular DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Rachel J Carter; Catherine M Nickson; James M Thompson; Andrzej Kacperek; Mark A Hill; Jason L Parsons
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Calculated relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for initial DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) from flattening filter and flattening filter-free 6 MV X-ray fields.

Authors:  Hisashi Nakano; Daisuke Kawahara; Satoshi Tanabe; Satoru Utsunomiya; Takeshi Takizawa; Madoka Sakai; Toshimichi Nakano; Atsushi Ohta; Motoki Kaidu; Hiroyuki Ishikawa
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.