Literature DB >> 25908836

A review of the surgical options for the correction of presbyopia.

Raquel Gil-Cazorla1, Sunil Shah2, Shehzad A Naroo3.   

Abstract

Presbyopia is an age-related eye condition where one of the signs is the reduction in the amplitude of accommodation, resulting in the loss of ability to change the eye's focus from far to near. It is the most common age-related ailments affecting everyone around their mid-40s. Methods for the correction of presbyopia include contact lens and spectacle options but the surgical correction of presbyopia still remains a significant challenge for refractive surgeons. Surgical strategies for dealing with presbyopia may be extraocular (corneal or scleral) or intraocular (removal and replacement of the crystalline lens or some type of treatment on the crystalline lens itself). There are however a number of limitations and considerations that have limited the widespread acceptance of surgical correction of presbyopia. Each surgical strategy presents its own unique set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, lens removal and replacement with an intraocular lens may not be preferable in a young patient with presbyopia without a refractive error. Similarly treatment on the crystalline lens may not be a suitable choice for a patient with early signs of cataract. This article is a review of the options available and those that are in development stages and are likely to be available in the near future for the surgical correction of presbyopia. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornea; Lens and zonules; Optics and Refraction; Sclera and Episclera; Treatment Lasers

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25908836     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  17 in total

1.  Visual quality assessment after presbyopic laser in-situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Dong Hui Lim; Eui-Sang Chung; Myoung Joon Kim; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Premium Monovision versus Bilateral Myopic Monovision, Hybrid Monovision and Bilateral Trifocal Implantation: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Asli Perente; Panagiota Ntonti; Konstantinos Delibasis; Ioannis Fotiadis; Aristeidis Konstantinidis; Doukas Dardabounis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-04

3.  Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  César Vilar; Wilson Takashi Hida; André Lins de Medeiros; Klayny Rafaella Pereira Magalhães; Patrick Frensel de Moraes Tzelikis; Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves; Antônio Francisco Pimenta Motta; Pedro Carlos Carricondo; Milton Ruiz Alves; Walton Nosé
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-01

4.  Visual outcomes 24 months after LaserACE.

Authors:  AnnMarie Hipsley; David Hui-Kang Ma; Chi-Chin Sun; Mitchell A Jackson; Daniel Goldberg; Brad Hall
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-16

5.  Evaluation of activities of daily living following pseudophakic presbyopic correction.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Panagiota Ntonti; Maria Patsiamanidi; Haris Sideroudi; Kimon Georgantzoglou; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-19

Review 6.  Scleral surgery for the treatment of presbyopia: where are we today?

Authors:  AnnMarie Hipsley; Brad Hall; Karolinne M Rocha
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-26

7.  Safety and satisfaction of myopic small-incision lenticule extraction combined with monovision.

Authors:  Dan Fu; Li Zeng; Jing Zhao; Hua-Mao Miao; Zhi-Qiang Yu; Xing-Tao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 8.  Review of Static Approaches to Surgical Correction of Presbyopia.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Zare Mehrjerdi; Masomeh Mohebbi; Mehdi Zandian
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

9.  Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zequan Xu; Danmin Cao; Xu Chen; Song Wu; Xin Wang; Qiang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Long-Term Evaluation of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction after Binocular Implantation of a Bioanalogic Lens.

Authors:  Sylwia Wagner; Grzegorz Wagner; Ewa Mrukwa-Kominek
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.