Daniel Bos1, Rahil Shahzad2, Theo van Walsum3, Lucas J van Vliet4, Oscar H Franco5, Albert Hofman5, Wiro J Niessen6, Meike W Vernooij1, Aad van der Lugt7. 1. Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000CA, The Netherlands Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Departments of Medical Informatics and Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Quantitative imaging group, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Departments of Medical Informatics and Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands Quantitative imaging group, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. 7. Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000CA, The Netherlands a.vanderlugt@erasmusmc.nl.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate relationships between epicardial fat volume and atherosclerosis in multiple major vessel beds. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the population-based Rotterdam Study, 2298 participants underwent computed tomography examinations to quantify epicardial fat volume and atherosclerotic calcification volume in the coronary arteries, aortic arch, and extracranial and intracranial internal carotid arteries. Using linear regression modelling, we investigated relationships of epicardial fat volume with atherosclerotic calcification volume in each vessel bed, adjusting for conventional cardiovascular risk factors (waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking, diabetes, and usage of blood pressure-lowering and lipid-lowering medication). To test whether associations of epicardial fat with calcification per vessel bed were independent of calcification elsewhere, we created a model in which all vessel beds were entered together. We found that a larger epicardial fat volume was associated with larger calcification volumes in the coronary arteries, aortic arch, and extracranial carotid arteries in both sexes. After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, larger epicardial fat volume was related to coronary and extracranial carotid artery calcification volume in males only [difference in calcification volume per SD increase in epicardial fat volume: 0.12 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.04; 0.19) and 0.14 (95% CI: 0.06; 0.22)]. These associations remained unchanged after entering all vessel beds into one model. CONCLUSION: Larger volumes of epicardial fat are associated with larger amounts of coronary and extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis in males, independent of cardiovascular risk factors. This could imply that epicardial fat also exerts a systemic effect on atherosclerosis development. Future longitudinal research is warranted to further disentangle these relationships with a specific focus on sex differences. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIM: To investigate relationships between epicardial fat volume and atherosclerosis in multiple major vessel beds. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the population-based Rotterdam Study, 2298 participants underwent computed tomography examinations to quantify epicardial fat volume and atherosclerotic calcification volume in the coronary arteries, aortic arch, and extracranial and intracranial internal carotid arteries. Using linear regression modelling, we investigated relationships of epicardial fat volume with atherosclerotic calcification volume in each vessel bed, adjusting for conventional cardiovascular risk factors (waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking, diabetes, and usage of blood pressure-lowering and lipid-lowering medication). To test whether associations of epicardial fat with calcification per vessel bed were independent of calcification elsewhere, we created a model in which all vessel beds were entered together. We found that a larger epicardial fat volume was associated with larger calcification volumes in the coronary arteries, aortic arch, and extracranial carotid arteries in both sexes. After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, larger epicardial fat volume was related to coronary and extracranial carotid artery calcification volume in males only [difference in calcification volume per SD increase in epicardial fat volume: 0.12 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.04; 0.19) and 0.14 (95% CI: 0.06; 0.22)]. These associations remained unchanged after entering all vessel beds into one model. CONCLUSION: Larger volumes of epicardial fat are associated with larger amounts of coronary and extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis in males, independent of cardiovascular risk factors. This could imply that epicardial fat also exerts a systemic effect on atherosclerosis development. Future longitudinal research is warranted to further disentangle these relationships with a specific focus on sex differences. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Albert Hofman; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-19 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: M Arfan Ikram; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Albert Hofman Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Jason M Tarkin; Marc R Dweck; Nicholas R Evans; Richard A P Takx; Adam J Brown; Ahmed Tawakol; Zahi A Fayad; James H F Rudd Journal: Circ Res Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Satish Kenchaiah; Jingzhong Ding; J Jeffrey Carr; Matthew A Allison; Matthew J Budoff; Russell P Tracy; Gregory L Burke; Robyn L McClelland; Andrew E Arai; David A Bluemke Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 27.203