Literature DB >> 25908615

Alu-mediated diverse and complex pathogenic copy-number variants within human chromosome 17 at p13.3.

Shen Gu1, Bo Yuan1, Ian M Campbell1, Christine R Beck1, Claudia M B Carvalho1, Sandesh C S Nagamani2, Ayelet Erez3, Ankita Patel1, Carlos A Bacino2, Chad A Shaw1, Paweł Stankiewicz1, Sau Wai Cheung1, Weimin Bi1, James R Lupski4.   

Abstract

Alu repetitive elements are known to be major contributors to genome instability by generating Alu-mediated copy-number variants (CNVs). Most of the reported Alu-mediated CNVs are simple deletions and duplications, and the mechanism underlying Alu-Alu-mediated rearrangement has been attributed to non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR). Chromosome 17 at the p13.3 genomic region lacks extensive low-copy repeat architecture; however, it is highly enriched for Alu repetitive elements, with a fraction of 30% of total sequence annotated in the human reference genome, compared with the 10% genome-wide and 18% on chromosome 17. We conducted mechanistic studies of the 17p13.3 CNVs by performing high-density oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization, specifically interrogating the 17p13.3 region with ∼150 bp per probe density; CNV breakpoint junctions were mapped to nucleotide resolution by polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. Studied rearrangements include 5 interstitial deletions, 14 tandem duplications, 7 terminal deletions and 13 complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs). Within the 17p13.3 region, Alu-Alu-mediated rearrangements were identified in 80% of the interstitial deletions, 46% of the tandem duplications and 50% of the CGRs, indicating that this mechanism was a major contributor for formation of breakpoint junctions. Our studies suggest that Alu repetitive elements facilitate formation of non-recurrent CNVs, CGRs and other structural aberrations of chromosome 17 at p13.3. The common observation of Alu-mediated rearrangement in CGRs and breakpoint junction sequences analysis further demonstrates that this type of mechanism is unlikely attributed to NAHR, but rather may be due to a recombination-coupled DNA replicative repair process.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25908615      PMCID: PMC4476451          DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddv146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  75 in total

1.  Double-strand breaks associated with repetitive DNA can reshape the genome.

Authors:  Juan Lucas Argueso; James Westmoreland; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Malgorzata Gawel; Thomas D Petes; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The complete genome of an individual by massively parallel DNA sequencing.

Authors:  David A Wheeler; Maithreyan Srinivasan; Michael Egholm; Yufeng Shen; Lei Chen; Amy McGuire; Wen He; Yi-Ju Chen; Vinod Makhijani; G Thomas Roth; Xavier Gomes; Karrie Tartaro; Faheem Niazi; Cynthia L Turcotte; Gerard P Irzyk; James R Lupski; Craig Chinault; Xing-zhi Song; Yue Liu; Ye Yuan; Lynne Nazareth; Xiang Qin; Donna M Muzny; Marcel Margulies; George M Weinstock; Richard A Gibbs; Jonathan M Rothberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The Alu-rich genomic architecture of SPAST predisposes to diverse and functionally distinct disease-associated CNV alleles.

Authors:  Philip M Boone; Bo Yuan; Ian M Campbell; Jennifer C Scull; Marjorie A Withers; Brett C Baggett; Christine R Beck; Christine J Shaw; Pawel Stankiewicz; Paolo Moretti; Wendy E Goodwin; Nichole Hein; John K Fink; Moon-Woo Seong; Soo Hyun Seo; Sung Sup Park; Izabela D Karbassi; Sat Dev Batish; Andrés Ordóñez-Ugalde; Beatriz Quintáns; María-Jesús Sobrido; Susanne Stemmler; James R Lupski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of chromosome fragile sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Wei Song; Margaret Dominska; Patricia W Greenwell; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Nascent DNA synthesis during homologous recombination is synergistically promoted by the rad51 recombinase and DNA homology.

Authors:  Maureen M Mundia; Vatsal Desai; Alissa C Magwood; Mark D Baker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  High frequency of genomic deletions--and a duplication--in the LIS1 gene in lissencephaly: implications for molecular diagnosis.

Authors:  D Mei; R Lewis; E Parrini; L P Lazarou; C Marini; D T Pilz; R Guerrini
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Chromosome rearrangements via template switching between diverged repeated sequences.

Authors:  Ranjith P Anand; Olga Tsaponina; Patricia W Greenwell; Cheng-Sheng Lee; Wei Du; Thomas D Petes; James E Haber
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Bacterial artificial chromosome-emulation oligonucleotide arrays for targeted clinical array-comparative genomic hybridization analyses.

Authors:  Zhishuo Ou; Sung-Hae L Kang; Chad A Shaw; Condie E Carmack; Lisa D White; Ankita Patel; Arthur L Beaudet; Sau Wai Cheung; A Craig Chinault
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Parental somatic mosaicism is underrecognized and influences recurrence risk of genomic disorders.

Authors:  Ian M Campbell; Bo Yuan; Caroline Robberecht; Rolph Pfundt; Przemyslaw Szafranski; Meriel E McEntagart; Sandesh C S Nagamani; Ayelet Erez; Magdalena Bartnik; Barbara Wiśniowiecka-Kowalnik; Katie S Plunkett; Amber N Pursley; Sung-Hae L Kang; Weimin Bi; Seema R Lalani; Carlos A Bacino; Mala Vast; Karen Marks; Michael Patton; Peter Olofsson; Ankita Patel; Joris A Veltman; Sau Wai Cheung; Chad A Shaw; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Joris R Vermeesch; James R Lupski; Paweł Stankiewicz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Identification of a novel human Rad51 variant that promotes DNA strand exchange.

Authors:  Jung-Young Park; Han-Wook Yoo; Bok-Ryang Kim; Raekil Park; Sang-Yun Choi; Youngho Kim
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  48 in total

1.  DNA REPAIR. Mus81 and converging forks limit the mutagenicity of replication fork breakage.

Authors:  Ryan Mayle; Ian M Campbell; Christine R Beck; Yang Yu; Marenda Wilson; Chad A Shaw; Lotte Bjergbaek; James R Lupski; Grzegorz Ira
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  2018 Victor A. McKusick Leadership Award: Molecular Mechanisms for Genomic and Chromosomal Rearrangements.

Authors:  James R Lupski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Generic Repeat Finder: A High-Sensitivity Tool for Genome-Wide De Novo Repeat Detection.

Authors:  Jieming Shi; Chun Liang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders.

Authors:  Claudia M B Carvalho; James R Lupski
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Xq22 deletions and correlation with distinct neurological disease traits in females: Further evidence for a contiguous gene syndrome.

Authors:  Hadia Hijazi; Fernanda S Coelho; Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; Laura Bernardini; Soe S Mar; Melanie A Manning; Andrea Hanson-Kahn; SakkuBai Naidu; Siddharth Srivastava; Jennifer A Lee; Julie R Jones; Michael J Friez; Thomas Alberico; Barbara Torres; Ping Fang; Sau Wai Cheung; Xiaofei Song; Angelique Davis-Williams; Carly Jornlin; Patricia A Wight; Pankaj Patyal; Jennifer Taube; Andrea Poretti; Ken Inoue; Feng Zhang; Davut Pehlivan; Claudia M B Carvalho; Grace M Hobson; James R Lupski
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 6.  Break-induced replication links microsatellite expansion to complex genome rearrangements.

Authors:  Michael Leffak
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Copy-Number Variation Contributes to the Mutational Load of Bardet-Biedl Syndrome.

Authors:  Anna Lindstrand; Stephan Frangakis; Claudia M B Carvalho; Ellen B Richardson; Kelsey A McFadden; Jason R Willer; Davut Pehlivan; Pengfei Liu; Igor L Pediaditakis; Aniko Sabo; Richard Alan Lewis; Eyal Banin; James R Lupski; Erica E Davis; Nicholas Katsanis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 8.  Multi-Invasion-Induced Rearrangements as a Pathway for Physiological and Pathological Recombination.

Authors:  Aurèle Piazza; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  Break-induced replication plays a prominent role in long-range repeat-mediated deletion.

Authors:  Qing Hu; Hongyan Lu; Hongjun Wang; Shibo Li; Lan Truong; Jun Li; Shuo Liu; Rong Xiang; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 10.  An evolving view of copy number variants.

Authors:  Stephanie Lauer; David Gresham
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.