Literature DB >> 25908360

A nomogram to calculate the maximum dose of local anaesthetic in a paediatric dental setting.

J D Walker1, A Summers1, D J Williams2.   

Abstract

While local anaesthetic agents are usually safe and are used ubiquitously, inadvertent overdoses may have potentially fatal consequences. Errors in the dosing of local anaesthetics frequently occur due to inherent difficulties in remembering the toxic dosage limits, difficulties in performing the appropriate calculations correctly, and errors in estimating patient weight. We have developed a simple graphical calculation aid (nomogram) to overcome these problems and facilitate rapid cross-checking of the maximum safe dose for a variety of local anaesthetic agents in common use. Standard mathematical techniques were used to draft the nomogram. A randomised blinded study using simulated patient data and Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the accuracy and precision of the nomogram. The nomogram was found to have a bias of 0.0 ml, with limits of agreement -0.05-0.04 ml. It was found to be easy to use and suitably accurate for clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25908360     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  15 in total

1.  A survey of local and topical anesthesia use by pediatric dentists in the United States.

Authors:  K Kohli; P Ngan; R Crout; C C Linscott
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.874

Review 2.  An update on local anesthetics in dentistry.

Authors:  Daniel A Haas
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  A nomogram to calculate the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM).

Authors:  D J Williams; J D Walker
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  A nomogram for calculating the maximum dose of local anaesthetic.

Authors:  D J Williams; J D Walker
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Local anesthetic mortality: report of case.

Authors:  E V Hersh; M L Helpin; O B Evans
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec

7.  Prilocaine induced methaemoglobinaemia in a medically compromised patient. Was this an inevitable consequence of the dose administered?

Authors:  V Adams; J Marley; C McCarroll
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 8.  Dentistry and obesity: a review and current status in U.S. predoctoral dental education.

Authors:  Judy Chia-Chun Yuan; Damian J Lee; Fatemeh S Afshari; Maria Therese S Galang; Cortino Sukotjo
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Body mass index reference curves for the UK, 1990.

Authors:  T J Cole; J V Freeman; M A Preece
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.