Literature DB >> 25906831

Implementation of a clinical decision support system improves compliance with restrictive transfusion policies in hematology patients.

Caroline E Butler1,2, Simon Noel2,3, Stephen P Hibbs1,2, David Miles3, Julie Staves3, Payam Mohaghegh3, Paul Altmann3, Elinor Curnow2, Michael F Murphy2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence for restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion but compliance with recommended transfusion triggers is variable. A clinical decision support system (CDSS) has been found to reduce unnecessary transfusion in some clinical settings when physicians are advised they are noncompliant with the current guidelines. The objective was to assess the impact of a CDSS for blood product ordering in patients with hematologic disease. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All platelet (PLT) and RBC transfusions were identified in hematology patients in three periods: before (baseline), immediately after (CDSS1), and 7 months after implementation of CDSS for blood ordering (CDSS2). Compliance with the recommended transfusion triggers was monitored for all orders made by CDSS or non-CDSS methods during each period.
RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients with a variety of hematologic diagnoses received 502 RBC and 572 PLT transfusions during the three periods with no significant difference in 1) the mean number of transfusions per patient, 2) the proportion of patients transfused, 3) posttransfusion hemoglobin (Hb), and 4) pre- and posttransfusion PLT count, although mean pretransfusion Hb decreased. The proportion of noncompliant RBC and PLT transfusion requests improved from baseline to CDSS2 (69.0% to 43.4% p ≤ 0.005 for RBCs; and 41.9% to 31.2%, p = 0.16 for PLT) when all orders were compared, although this improvement was not significant at the 5% level for PLTs.
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of CDSS for blood product ordering supported by education and physician feedback in the hematology setting had an immediate impact on improving compliance with guidelines for restrictive transfusion practice.
© 2015 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25906831     DOI: 10.1111/trf.13075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  8 in total

1.  Measures Used to Assess the Impact of Interventions to Reduce Low-Value Care: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jennifer K Maratt; Eve A Kerr; Mandi L Klamerus; Shannon E Lohman; Whit Froehlich; R Sacha Bhatia; Sameer D Saini
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Computerised decision support systems to promote appropriate use of blood products.

Authors:  Sheila A Fisher; Annemarie B Docherty; Carolyn Doree; Stephen P Hibbs; Michael F Murphy; Lise J Estcourt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02

3.  Appropriate use of red blood cell transfusion in emergency departments: a study in five emergency departments.

Authors:  Manuel Quintana Díaz; Alberto M Borobia; José A García Erce; Charbel Maroun-Eid; Sara Fabra; Antonio Carcas; Jesus Frías; Manuel Muñoz
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Single versus double-unit transfusion: Safety and efficacy for patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Zelia Bowman; Naomi Fei; Janice Ahn; Sijin Wen; Aaron Cumpston; Nilay Shah; Michael Craig; Peter L Perrotta; Abraham S Kanate
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Assessing the appropriateness of blood transfusion among injured patients at a Ghanaian tertiary hospital: Time for clarity on the use of a scarce resource.

Authors:  Adam Gyedu; Stephanie K Goodman; Robert Quansah; Maxwell Osei-Ampofo; Peter Donkor; Charles Mock
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Racial differences in red blood cell transfusion in hospitalized patients with anemia.

Authors:  Micah Prochaska; Jorge Salcedo; Grace Berry; David Meltzer
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  Behaviour modification interventions to optimise red blood cell transfusion practices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lesley J J Soril; Thomas W Noseworthy; Laura E Dowsett; Katherine Memedovich; Hannah M Holitzki; Diane L Lorenzetti; Henry Thomas Stelfox; David A Zygun; Fiona M Clement
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  De-implementing low-value care in cancer care delivery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Kea Turner; Alecia Clary; Young-Rock Hong; Oliver T Nguyen; Grace Wei; Rebecca B Carlson; Sarah A Birken
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 7.327

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.