Manuel Quintana Díaz1,2, Alberto M Borobia3, José A García Erce4, Charbel Maroun-Eid1, Sara Fabra1, Antonio Carcas3, Jesus Frías3, Manuel Muñoz5. 1. Emergency Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. 2. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Madrid Autonomous University, Madrid, Spain. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. 4. Service of Haematology and Haemotherapy, San Jorge Hospital, Huesca, Spain. 5. Department of Surgical Specialties, Biochemistry and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transfusion of blood components continues to be an important therapeutic resource into the 21st century. Between 5 and 58% of transfusions carried out are estimated to be unnecessary. According to several studies, at least 20% of packed red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) are administered in hospital emergency departments (ED), but few data are available about the appropriateness of RBCT in this setting. This multicentre, cross-sectional observational study aims to assess the appropriateness of RBCT indications and transfused volumes in patients who attend ED. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort is made up of consecutive consenting adult patients (≥18 years old) who received RBCT in ED over a 3-month period and for whom relevant clinical data were collected and analysed. RESULTS: Data from 908 RBCT episodes (2±1 units per transfused patient) were analysed. RBCT was considered appropriate in 21.4% (n=195), with significant differences according to RBCT indication (p<0.001), hospital level (p<0.001) and prescribing physician (p=0.002). Pre-transfusion haemoglobin level (Hb) negatively correlated with RBCT appropriateness (r=-0.616; p<0.01). Only 72.4% of appropriate RBCT had a post-transfusion Hb assessment (n=516). Of these, 45% were considered to be over-transfused (n=232), with significant differences according to RBCT indication (p=0.012) and prescribing physician (p=0.047). Overall, 584/1,433 (41%) of evaluable RBC units were unnecessarily transfused. DISCUSSION: The appropriateness of RBCT in ED is similar to other hospital departments, but the rate of over-transfusion was high. These data support the need for a reassessment after transfusion of each RBC unit before further units are prescribed. In view of these results, we recommend that physicians should be made more aware of the need to prescribe RBCT appropriately in order to reduce over-transfusion.
BACKGROUND: Transfusion of blood components continues to be an important therapeutic resource into the 21st century. Between 5 and 58% of transfusions carried out are estimated to be unnecessary. According to several studies, at least 20% of packed red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) are administered in hospital emergency departments (ED), but few data are available about the appropriateness of RBCT in this setting. This multicentre, cross-sectional observational study aims to assess the appropriateness of RBCT indications and transfused volumes in patients who attend ED. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort is made up of consecutive consenting adult patients (≥18 years old) who received RBCT in ED over a 3-month period and for whom relevant clinical data were collected and analysed. RESULTS: Data from 908 RBCT episodes (2±1 units per transfused patient) were analysed. RBCT was considered appropriate in 21.4% (n=195), with significant differences according to RBCT indication (p<0.001), hospital level (p<0.001) and prescribing physician (p=0.002). Pre-transfusion haemoglobin level (Hb) negatively correlated with RBCT appropriateness (r=-0.616; p<0.01). Only 72.4% of appropriate RBCT had a post-transfusion Hb assessment (n=516). Of these, 45% were considered to be over-transfused (n=232), with significant differences according to RBCT indication (p=0.012) and prescribing physician (p=0.047). Overall, 584/1,433 (41%) of evaluable RBC units were unnecessarily transfused. DISCUSSION: The appropriateness of RBCT in ED is similar to other hospital departments, but the rate of over-transfusion was high. These data support the need for a reassessment after transfusion of each RBC unit before further units are prescribed. In view of these results, we recommend that physicians should be made more aware of the need to prescribe RBCT appropriately in order to reduce over-transfusion.
Authors: Kumanan Wilson; Laura MacDougall; Dean Fergusson; Ian Graham; Alan Tinmouth; Paul C Hébert Journal: Transfusion Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: A Gutiérrez Macías; E Núñez Cuerda; J C Sanz Prieto; M Martínez Ortiz de Zárate Journal: Med Clin (Barc) Date: 1997-09-27 Impact factor: 1.725
Authors: Càndid Villanueva; Alan Colomo; Alba Bosch; Mar Concepción; Virginia Hernandez-Gea; Carles Aracil; Isabel Graupera; María Poca; Cristina Alvarez-Urturi; Jordi Gordillo; Carlos Guarner-Argente; Miquel Santaló; Eduardo Muñiz; Carlos Guarner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Manuel Quintana-Díaz; Raúl Muñoz-Romo; Susana Gómez-Ramírez; José Pavía; Alberto M Borobia; José A García-Erce; Manuel Muñoz Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Dustin G Mark; Jie Huang; Colleen Plimier; Mary E Reed; Gabriel J Escobar; David R Vinson; Nareg H Roubinian Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Adam Gyedu; Stephanie K Goodman; Robert Quansah; Maxwell Osei-Ampofo; Peter Donkor; Charles Mock Journal: Injury Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Raúl Juárez-Vela; Eva María Andrés-Esteban; Vicente Gea-Caballero; Juan Luis Sánchez-González; Pilar Marcos-Neira; Ainhoa Serrano-Lázaro; Gabriel Tirado-Anglés; Juan Carlos Ruiz-Rodríguez; Ángela Durante; Iván Santolalla-Arnedo; José Antonio García-Erce; Manuel Quintana-Díaz Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 4.241