Literature DB >> 25906346

Patients' treatment beliefs in low back pain: development and validation of a questionnaire in primary care.

Alexandra Dima1, George T Lewith, Paul Little, Rona Moss-Morris, Nadine E Foster, Matthew Hankins, George Surtees, Felicity L Bishop.   

Abstract

Choosing the most appropriate treatment for individual patients with low back pain (LBP) can be challenging, and clinical guidelines recommend taking into account patients' preferences. However, no tools exist to assess or compare patients' views about LBP treatments. We report the development and validation of the Low Back Pain Treatment Beliefs Questionnaire (LBP-TBQ) for use across different treatments in clinical practice and research. Using qualitative data, we developed a pool of items assessing perceived credibility, effectiveness, concerns about, and individual "fit" of specific treatments. These items were included in a survey completed by 429 primary care patients with LBP, of whom 115 completed it again 1 to 2 weeks later. We performed psychometric analyses using nonparametric item response theory and classical test theory. The 4 subscales of the resulting 16-item LBP-TBQ showed good homogeneity (H = 0.46-0.76), internal consistency (α = 0.73-0.94), and stability (r = 0.63-0.83), confirmed most convergent and discriminant validity hypotheses, and had acceptable structural validity for 4 guideline-recommended treatments: pain medication, exercise, manual therapy, and acupuncture. Participants with stronger positive treatment beliefs were more likely to rank that treatment as their first choice, indicating good criterion validity (t values = 3.11-9.80, all P < 0.01, except pain medication effectiveness beliefs, t(339) = 1.35; P = 0.18). A short 4-item version also displayed good homogeneity (H = 0.43-0.66), internal consistency (α = 0.70-0.86), and stability (r = 0.82-0.85) and was significantly related to treatment choice (t values = 4.33-9.25, all P < 0.01). The LBP-TBQ can be used to assess treatment beliefs in primary care patients with LBP and to investigate the effects of treatment beliefs on treatment uptake and adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25906346     DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  11 in total

1.  The healthcare buffet: preferences in the clinical decision-making process for patients with musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Josh A Cleland; Paul Mintken; Jason M Beneciuk; Mark D Bishop
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-10-17

2.  Do Decision Aids Benefit Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emily Bowen; Rabih Nayfe; Nathaniel Milburn; Helen Mayo; M C Reid; Liana Fraenkel; Debra Weiner; Ethan A Halm; Una E Makris
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Experiences and Attitudes About Chiropractic Care and Prescription Drug Therapy Among Patients With Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Serena Bezdjian; James M Whedon; Justin M Goehl; Louis A Kazal
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2021-05-12

4.  Attributes Underlying Non-surgical Treatment Choice for People With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review.

Authors:  Thomas G Poder; Marion Beffarat
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2021-03-14

5.  Non-specific mechanisms in orthodox and CAM management of low back pain (MOCAM): theoretical framework and protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Katherine Bradbury; Miznah Al-Abbadey; Dawn Carnes; Borislav D Dimitrov; Susan Eardley; Carol Fawkes; Jo Foster; Maddy Greville-Harris; J Matthew Harvey; Janine Leach; George Lewith; Hugh MacPherson; Lisa Roberts; Laura Parry; Lucy Yardley; Felicity L Bishop
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Development of the "Treatment beliefs in knee and hip OsteoArthritis (TOA)" questionnaire.

Authors:  Ellen M H Selten; Johanna E Vriezekolk; Henk J Schers; Marc W Nijhof; Willemijn H van der Laan; Roelien G van der Meulen-Dilling; Rinie Geenen; Cornelia H M van den Ende
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Identifying psychosocial characteristics that predict outcome to the UPLIFT programme for people with persistent back pain: protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hayley Thomson; Kerrie Evans; Jonathon Dearness; John Kelley; Kylie Conway; Collette Morris; Leanne Bisset; Gwendolijne Scholten-Peeters; Pim Cuijpers; Michel W Coppieters
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Dutch Translation and Adaptation of the Treatment Beliefs Questionnaire for Chronic Pain Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Harriët Wittink; Janke Oosterhaven; Jos Dekker; Cas Kruitwagen; Walter Devillé; Else Ellens; Carin Schroder
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Informing Adults With Back Pain About Placebo Effects: Randomized Controlled Evaluation of a New Website With Potential to Improve Informed Consent in Clinical Research.

Authors:  Felicity L Bishop; Maddy Greville-Harris; Jennifer Bostock; Amy Din; Cynthia A Graham; George Lewith; Christina Liossi; Tim O'Riordan; Peter White; Lucy Yardley
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Understanding sciatica: illness and treatment beliefs in a lumbar radicular pain population. A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Robert Goldsmith; Nefyn Howard Williams; Fiona Wood
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2019-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.