| Literature DB >> 25905461 |
José P Leite1, Márcia Duarte2, Ana M Paiva3, Frederico Ferreira-da-Silva1, Pedro M Matias4, Olga C Nunes3, Luís Gales5.
Abstract
Molinate is a recalcitrantEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25905461 PMCID: PMC4407906 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Two thiocarbamate herbicides commonly applied to rice crops.
Fig 2Overall structure of recombinant molinate hydrolase homotetramer.
The monomers are coloured individually and the zinc cofactors are represented by orange spheres.
Fig 3Structure of recombinant molinate hydrolase monomer highlighting the protein secondary structure.
The zinc cofactor is represented by the orange sphere and the side chains of the active site residues are shown as sticks. α-helices are predominant, although a β-sandwich domain and two short β-sheets are also present.
Fig 4β-sheet arrangement around the catalytic site.
Overlay of the β-strands around the catalytic metal of molinate hydrolase (pink) and N-acetyl glucosamine-6-phosphate deacetylase (green; PDB entry: 1o126), an enzyme that shows the classic β-barrel core (green) of the amidohydrolase superfamily; the usual β-strand numbering of the β-barrel is presented. The Cα of the metal coordinating residues were used for structure superposition. Catalytic metals are shown as spheres (zinc orange; iron yellow).
Fig 5The active site of recombinant molinate hydrolase (detailed view; background in cartoon representation; highlighted residues in stick representation, with carbon backbone in cyan, oxygen red and nitrogen dark blue; the Zn cofactor is shown as an orange sphere and water molecules as red spheres).
The anomalous difference map computed from the diffraction data measured at the Zinc absorption edge K and contoured at 4σis shown in orange mesh, and the 2Fo-Fc electron density map at 2σis drawn as a blue mesh around the side chains of the active site residues.
Fig 6Circular dichroism spectra of the recombinant molinate hydrolase and of the mutants Lys240Ala, His282Ala and His302Ala.
Fig 7Active site homology.
Active site structure homology between (A) recombinant molinate hydrolase and (B) subtype IV amidohydrolase N-acetyl glucosamine-6-phosphate deacetylase from T. maritima (PDB entry: 1o12; 6). Water molecules are represented as red spheres, zinc as an orange sphere and iron as a yellow sphere.
Fig 8Proposed catalytic mechanism for molinate hydrolase based on previous models [6, 7].
Fig 9Effect of azepane-1-carboxilate (ACA) and ethanethiol on the activity of recombinant molinate hydrolase.
Assays were performed with 0.5 mM molinate in 50 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 at 30°C, with a protein concentration of 5 μg.ml-1 in the presence of different concentrations of ACA and ethanethiol. The data points represent the mean values from triplicate assays and the error bars are the corresponding standard deviations.
Fig 10Site direct mutagenesis of molinate hydrolase.
Detail view of the active site highlighting (in yellow) the residues that potentially restrict the access to the active site. In order to attempt to engineer the enzyme to degrade bulky thiocarbamates, single-site mutants of Arg187, Phe253 and Phe346 to alanine were produced.
Fig 11Molinate hydrolase activity kinetics.
Dependence of the initial reaction rate on the substrate concentration (molinate, top; thiobencarb, bottom) by recombinant molinate hydrolase (♦), mutant Arg187Ala (●) and mutant Phe253Ala (■).
Crystallographic data collection, processing and phase refinement statistics for the SeMet derivative.
|
| |
| Beamline | ESRF ID14-4 |
| Detector | ADSC Q315r |
| Wavelength (Å) | 0.9736 |
| Data Processing | XDS/CCP4 |
| Space Group |
|
| Unit cell parameters (Å,°) | |
|
| 128.44 |
|
| 230.18 |
|
| 264.83 |
|
| 90, 90, 90 |
| Resolution (Å) | 57.8–2.85 (2.95–2.85) |
| Nr. Observations | 1343228 (134496) |
| Unique reflections | 91555 (8907) |
| Multiplicity | 14.7 (15.1) |
| Completeness (%) | 100.0 (100.0) |
| R-merge (%) | 11.2 (56.0) |
| <I/σ (I)> | 21.3 (4.2) |
| R-pim (%) | 3.2 (14.8) |
| Wilson B (Å2) | 54.7 |
| Z | 4 |
| Estimated VM
| 4.48 |
| Estimated Solvent Content (%) | 72.5 |
|
| |
| Phasing power, anomalous | 2.13 |
| Anomalous Rcullis | 0.570 |
| SHARP FOM, acentric | 0.424 |
| SHARP FOM, centric | 0.106 |
| SHARP FOM, overall | 0.403 |
|
| |
| Overall |E2| correlation | 0.813 |
| FOM after density modification | 0.911 |
a Values in parentheses refer to the highest resolution shell.
b R-merge = merging R-factor, (Σhkl Σi |Ii(hkl)—|) / (Σhkl Σi I(hkl)) × 100%
c R-pim = precision independent R-factor, Σhkl [1/(N-1)]1/2 Σi |Ii(hkl)—| / (Σhkl Σi Ii(hkl)) × 100%[24]. For each unique Bragg reflection with indices (hkl), Ii is the i-th observation of its intensity and N its multiplicity.
d Nr. molecules in the asymmetric unit.
e According to Matthews coefficient [25].
f from SHARP optimizing density modification procedure with SOLOMON [20].
Data collection and refinement statistics.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Wavelength (Å) | 1.265 |
| Space Group |
|
| Unit-cell parameters (Å) | |
| | 367.6 |
| | 99.0 |
| | 131.3 |
| β | 109.6 |
| Resolution range (Å) | 100.0–2.27 (2.35–2.27) |
| Observed reflections | 545964 (31520) |
| No. of unique reflections | |
| Completeness (%) | 93.6 (66.3) |
| Multiplicity | 2.66 (1.56) |
| <I/σ(I)> | 12.2 (1.73) |
| R-merge (%) | 5.8 (47.8) |
|
| |
| Rcryst(%) | 20.1 |
| Rfree(%) | 22.9 |
| RMSD for bonds (Å) | 0.0131 |
| RMSD for angles (°) | 1.5587 |
| RMSD for chiral volumes (Å3) | 0.0911 |
| Average main chain B-factor (Å2) | 39.17 |
| Average side chain B-factor (Å2) | 52.67 |
| Average zinc B-factor (Å2) | 56.35 |
| Average water B-factor (Å2) | 39.71 |
| Ramachandran plot statistics (%) | |
| Favoured regions | 96.16 |
| Allowed regions | 3.84 |
a R-merge = merging R-factor, (Σhkl Σi |Ii(hkl)—|) / (Σhkl Σi I(hkl)) × 100%
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.