Literature DB >> 25903422

Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies multiple novel associations and ethnic heterogeneity of psoriasis susceptibility.

Xianyong Yin1, Hui Qi Low2, Ling Wang2, Yonghong Li3, Eva Ellinghaus4, Jiali Han5, Xavier Estivill6, Liangdan Sun1, Xianbo Zuo1, Changbing Shen1, Caihong Zhu1, Anping Zhang1, Fabio Sanchez7, Leonid Padyukov8, Joseph J Catanese3, Gerald G Krueger9, Kristina Callis Duffin9, Sören Mucha4, Michael Weichenthal10, Stephan Weidinger10, Wolfgang Lieb11, Jia Nee Foo2, Yi Li2, Karseng Sim2, Herty Liany2, Ishak Irwan2, Yikying Teo12, Colin T S Theng13, Rashmi Gupta14, Anne Bowcock15, Philip L De Jager16, Abrar A Qureshi17, Paul I W de Bakker18, Mark Seielstad19, Wilson Liao14, Mona Ståhle7, Andre Franke4, Xuejun Zhang1, Jianjun Liu20.   

Abstract

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin disease with complex genetics and different degrees of prevalence across ethnic populations. Here we present the largest trans-ethnic genome-wide meta-analysis (GWMA) of psoriasis in 15,369 cases and 19,517 controls of Caucasian and Chinese ancestries. We identify four novel associations at LOC144817, COG6, RUNX1 and TP63, as well as three novel secondary associations within IFIH1 and IL12B. Fine-mapping analysis of MHC region demonstrates an important role for all three HLA class I genes and a complex and heterogeneous pattern of HLA associations between Caucasian and Chinese populations. Further, trans-ethnic comparison suggests population-specific effect or allelic heterogeneity for 11 loci. These population-specific effects contribute significantly to the ethnic diversity of psoriasis prevalence. This study not only provides novel biological insights into the involvement of immune and keratinocyte development mechanism, but also demonstrates a complex and heterogeneous genetic architecture of psoriasis susceptibility across ethnic populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25903422      PMCID: PMC4423213          DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


Psoriasis is a common immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disease characterized by hyperplasia, altered proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes, vascular remodelling and inflammation in the skin, with musculoskeletal inflammation of the joints observed in up to 30% of patients1. Psoriasis shows a diverse prevalence across worldwide populations, 2.5% in Europeans, 0.05–3% in Africans and 0.1–0.5% in Asians234. Phenotypic heterogeneity of psoriasis has also been reported among ethnic populations, such as clinical manifestation, response to treatments and disease progression3456. Psoriasis has a high genetic predisposition with estimated heritability up to 80% (refs 1, 7). Forty-one susceptibility loci have been identified at genome-wide significance (P<5 × 10−8) mainly through genome-wide association studies (GWASs)8910111213141516, but these susceptibility loci collectively only explain a limited fraction of the heritability of psoriasis1617. In addition, few loci also show differential associations between ethnic populations, suggesting potential genetic heterogeneity of psoriasis, although most of the loci have not been systematically studied beyond the original population in which they are discovered2. Recently, trans-ethnic genome-wide meta-analysis (GWMA) of the GWAS data sets of diverse populations have been performed to identify additional susceptibility loci and dissect validated loci through fine-mapping analysis, which can help to better understand the genetic architecture of complex diseases181920212223242526. Trans-ethnic GWMA across diverse populations has not been performed in psoriasis, and the genetic heterogeneity of psoriasis across diverse ancestries has not yet been systematically investigated. Here, we describe a large-scale trans-ethnic GWMA of psoriasis using multiple GWAS data sets as well as independent validation samples from Caucasian and Chinese populations. We identify four novel associations at LOC144817, COG6, RUNX1 and TP63, as well as three novel secondary associations within IFIH1 and IL12B. In addition, our study suggests population-specific effect or allelic heterogeneity for 11 loci, and indicates that these population-specific effects contribute significantly to the ethnic diversity of psoriasis prevalence. Together, these results provide novel biological insights into the involvement of immune and keratinocyte development mechanism, but also demonstrate a complex and heterogeneous genetic architecture of psoriasis susceptibility across ethnic populations.

Results

Genome-wide Meta-Analysis

We carried out GWMA of psoriasis using seven independent GWAS data sets, including five published ones (four Caucasians and one Chinese)111516 and two unpublished ones (one Caucasian and one Chinese; Table 1). The combined data set consists of a total number of 5,084 psoriatic cases and 8,732 controls, with 3,496 cases and 5,186 controls from Caucasian population and 1,588 cases and 3,546 controls from Chinese population. To combine these seven independent data sets that were generated by using different genotyping platforms and further enhance the coverage of genetic variants for association analysis, whole-genome imputation was performed in each of the seven data sets separately using the 1000 Genomes Project data set (Phase I, Dec. 2010 version) as the reference panel. After applying stringent quality controls (QCs), we tested 4,778,154, 4,562,294 and 3,621,551 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for association in the Caucasian, Chinese and combined cohorts, respectively (Table 1). Both the quantile–quantile plots and genomic inflation factors (λGC) of the genome-wide test statistic (1.017 for Caucasian cohort, 1.01 for Chinese cohort and 1.011 for the combined cohort) demonstrated that the three genome-wide association analyses had negligible inflation because of population stratification (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Meanwhile, the quantile–quantile and Manhattan plots of the three genome-wide analyses showed an excess of SNPs with small P values (<1 × 10−4 from the logistic regression analysis in individual ethnic and combined data sets) after removing the SNPs within 41 known loci, suggesting additional associations (of more modest effect) may be identified with further validation (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). All the known loci showed supporting evidences of association with nominal significance (P<0.05) in at least one genome-wide analysis, except CSMD1 and SERPINB8 that did not show any association, likely due to the insufficient statistical power (<30%) of the current study for detecting their associations (Supplementary Data 1).
Table 1

Description of study samples.

StudyEthnicityPopulation sampleCases (N)Controls (N)TotalλGCλGC_1000
GWAS data sets
 UCEuropeanUS2024926941.041*1.143
 KIEuropeanSweden7271,1981,9251.032*1.035
 GAINEuropeanUS1,3361,3722,7081.0321.024
 KielEuropeanGermany4711,1291,6001.046*1.069
 GenizonEuropeanCanada7609951,7551.0391.045
European  3,4965,1868,6821.0731.017
 AnhuiChineseChina1,1391,1122,2511.016*1.014
 SingaporeChineseSingapore4492,4342,8831.0311.041
Chinese  1,5883,5465,1341.0221.01
TOTAL  5,0848,73213,8161.0711.011
        
Replication cohorts
 UCEuropeanUS8966361,532
 KIEuropeanSweden1,0255101,535
 HarvardEuropeanUS5595721,131
 SpainEuropeanSpain408327735
 CeleraEuropeanUS1,4361,3802,816
 KielEuropeanGermany8102,2083,018
 AnhuiChineseChina5,1515,15210,303
TOTAL  10,28510,78521,070 

*Adjust for principal components (PCs).

†Adjust for studies and PCs.

Figure 1

Manhattan plot of single SNP association test results.

(a) Chinese GWAS meta-analysis with 1,588 cases and 3,546 controls; (b) Caucasian GWAS meta-analysis with 3,496 cases and 5,186 controls; (c) trans-ethnic GWAS meta-analysis with 5,084 cases and 8,732 controls. The x-axis indicates the chromosomal position. The y-axis indicates the –log10 P values of genome-wide SNP associations from each GWAS meta-analysis using logistic regression. The horizontal green line represents the genome-wide significance threshold of P=5.0 × 10−8. Blue dots indicate the association results of SNPs within the 41 known psoriasis risk loci; red dots indicate the association results of SNPs within the four new psoriasis risk loci; grey dots indicate the association results of SNPs outside the 45 psoriasis risk loci.

Validation Analysis of Novel Associations

We carried out the validation study of novel associations suggested by GWMA. Forty-three novel SNPs with suggestive association (P<5.00 × 10−5 from the logistic regression analysis) in at least one of the three discovery analyses (Caucasian, Chinese and Combined) were genotyped in additional two independent validation cohorts totaling 10,285 psoriatic cases and 10,785 controls, with 5,134 cases and 5,633 controls from Caucasian and 5,151 cases and 5,152 controls from Chinese populations (Table 1 and Supplementary Data 2). In the Caucasian samples, four novel associations were confirmed at genome-wide significance with consistent effects between the discovery and validation samples: rs9533962 (odds ratio (OR)=1.14, P=1.93 × 10−8, LOC144817), rs34394770 (OR=1.16, P=2.65 × 10−8, COG6), rs8128234 (OR=1.17, P=3.74 × 10−8, RUNX1) and rs28512356 (OR=1.17, P=4.31 × 10−8, TP63; Table 2 and Supplementary Figs 2 and 3). In the Chinese samples, all the four SNPs showed the consistent effect of association, but only rs34394770 and rs9533962 achieved nominal significance (P=4.63 × 10−2, 2.25 × 10−4, respectively). Both SNPs achieved genome-wide significance in the combined cohort (P=4.87 × 10−8, 7.53 × 10−11; Table 2 and Supplementary Figs 2 and 3). However, the other two novel SNPs did not achieve nominal significant association in Chinese samples, although the Chinese samples have sufficient power (statistic power>90%) to detect their effects observed in Caucasian population and was adequately powered to detect effect size (for example, ORs) as small as 1.15–1.25 (Supplementary Data 1 and Supplementary Table 1). No other SNPs selected from the discovery analyses in the Chinese and combined samples were validated.
Table 2

Meta-analysis results of the 4 novel psoriasis susceptibility loci.

GeneSNPChrBP.B37RARAF
StageEuropean
Chinese
Combined All
     EURCHN POR(95%CI)POR(95%CI)POR(95%CI)PQ
TP63rs285123563189615475C0.7990.826GWAS9.99E−061.20 (1.11–1.30)9.52E−011.00 (0.88–1.13)7.70E−061.10 (1.06–1.15)9.62E−04
       Validation9.30E−041.15 (1.06–1.25)4.93E−011.03 (0.96–1.10)   
       Combined4.31E−081.17 (1.11–1.24)5.68E−011.02 (0.96–1.08)   
COG6rs343947701340333369T0.6430.763GWAS5.55E−071.18 (1.11–1.26)1.22E−011.10 (0.98–1.23)4.87E−081.11 (1.07–1.15)2.04E−02
       Validation8.21E−031.12 (1.03–1.21)1.43E−011.05 (0.98–1.11)   
       Combined2.65E−081.16 (1.10–1.22)4.63E−021.06 (1.00–1.12)   
LOC144817rs95339621345334194C0.4060.449GWAS1.76E−031.11 (1.04–1.18)3.93E−051.23 (1.12–1.36)7.53E−111.12 (1.08–1.15)2.91E−01
       Validation1.60E−061.16 (1.09–1.24)5.30E−021.06 (1.00–1.12)   
       Combined1.93E−081.14 (1.09–1.19)2.25E−041.09 (1.04–1.15)   
RUNX1rs81282342136470865T0.1970.111GWAS1.82E−051.19 (1.10–1.28)8.98E−021.15 (0.98–1.34)5.99E−081.13 (1.08–1.18)4.23E−02
       Validation4.77E−041.15 (1.06–1.24)3.35E−011.04 (0.96–1.13)   
       Combined3.74E−081.17 (1.11–1.23)9.88E−021.06 (0.99–1.14)   

BP.B37, position based on NCBI build 37; CHN, Han Chinese samples; Chr, chromosome; GWAS, genome-wide association study; EUR, European samples; RA, risk alleles; RAF, risk allele's frequencies; OR, odds ratio; P: association P values in logistic regression test (alleles dosages in GWAS studies); 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; PQ: P values of heterogeneity test; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

Giving that all the newly discovered SNPs are noncoding variants, we have investigated the regulatory functions of these SNPs by analysing the information from the HaploReg (v2) and eQTL databases. The four novel SNPs were enriched in the enhancers of epidermal keratinocytes, and resided in known DNAse I hypersensitivity in multiple cell lines including normal human epidermal keratinocytes (Supplementary Table 2). And it was shown that three linked SNPs with rs34394770 conferred eQTL effect for COG6 in monocytes (Supplementary Table 3). We also searched for independent secondary associations within 45 previously and newly confirmed susceptibility loci in the discovery samples through conditional logistic regression analysis using the leading SNP within each locus as covariate (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figs 3–5). First, we discovered three independent associations within IL12B locus at two novel SNPs, rs4921493 (Pcondition=6.80 × 10−13) and rs2853694 (Pcondition=1.22 × 10−9) and the previously reported rs7709212 (OR=1.38, P=2.44 × 10−30) in the combined discovery samples, whose independent effects were also confirmed by multivariate analysis (Supplementary Table 4a). The three SNPs are in low or moderate linkage disequilibrium (LD) (Supplementary Fig. 3e and Supplementary Table 4b) and showed consistent associations between the Caucasian and Chinese samples (Supplementary Table 4a). In addition, haplotype analysis also supported independent effects of the three SNPs (Supplementary Table 4c). Second, we discovered a novel independent SNP within the IFIH1 locus. In Caucasian samples, the conditional analysis on the top SNP rs1990760 (OR=1.20, P=3.21 × 10−13) revealed a novel independent association at rs3747517 (ORcondition=0.75, Pcondition=2.87 × 10−11), although rs3747517 did not show association by itself (OR=1.04, P=0.15; Supplementary Fig. 3f and Supplementary Table 5a). Consistently, rs3747517 only showed significant association (ORcondition=0.80, Pcondition=5.16 × 10−9) in the Chinese cohort after conditioning on rs1990760 (Supplementary Fig. 3f and Supplementary Table 5a). The interactive effect between the two SNPs was confirmed by haplotype association analysis showing that only the haplotype 2 carrying the C alleles of the two SNPs showed strong protective effect (Supplementary Table 5b). In addition, our analysis showed that conditioning on rs1990760 can abolish the two previously reported independent associations at rs2111485 and rs17716942 (Supplementary Table 5a). These results suggest that both rs1990760 and rs3747517 tag the association effect of this haplotype in Caucasian and Chinese populations, and true causal variant carried by this haplotype remains to be discovered. In addition, we have also confirmed the previously reported independent associations at rs2910686 and rs30376 within ERAP1/ERAP2 locus16 in the Caucasian GWAS samples (Supplementary Table 6 and Supplementary Fig. 3g). However, we did not detect the independent association effect of rs2910688 (OR=0.99, P=0.67) in the Chinese GWAS samples, although there was sufficient power to detect the effect of the same size (power=0.98 at P=0.05). Another six suggestive secondary associations failed to be validated or reach genome-wide significance (Supplementary Data 3).
Figure 2

The regional association plots of ZMIZ1 showing locus heterogeneity.

The relative location of annotated genes and the direction of transcription are shown in the lower portion of the figure, and the chromosomal position is shown on the x axis. The blue line shows the recombination rate (estimated from HapMap data of CEU, CHB and combined population) across the region (right y axis), and the left y axis shows the significance of the SNP associations (−log10 P). The square indicates the SNPs for conditional analysis (these are the top or secondary SNPs); the circle labelled with rs IDs are reported psoriasis susceptibility SNPs. All circles and squares are colour filled based on the heterogeneity results (I2) in our trans-ethnic meta analysis. (a,b) Unconditional and conditional logistic association results of Caucasian, (c, d) unconditional and conditional logistic association results of Chinese.

Fine Mapping Analysis of HLA Associations

To better understand the strong and extensive association within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region (chr6: 20–40 Mb, build 36; Supplementary Fig. 5), we performed a fine-mapping analysis of the region by imputing classical alleles and coding variants of HLA molecules and untyped SNPs in the Caucasian and Chinese discovery cohorts separately. As expected, the HLA-C*06:02 allele showed the strongest association within the region in both Caucasian (P=3.05 × 10−167) and Chinese (P=2.09 × 10−101). Stepwise conditional analysis revealed additional independent associations at the penta-allelic amino-acid polymorphism at the position 67 of HLA-B (HLA-B_AA_67) (Pcondition=4.31 × 10−25 after conditioning on HLA-C*06:02), HLA-A*02:01 (Pcondition=3.62 × 10−10 after conditioning on both HLA-C*0602 and HLA-B_AA_67) and rs9265656 (Pcondition=5.27 × 10−9 after conditioning on the three HLA variants) in the Caucasian cohort (Supplementary Table 7). Rs9265656 tags (r2=0.78) the classical allele HLA-B*07 (Pcondition=1.13 × 10−5 after conditioning on the three HLA variants above) and did not show any eQTL effect. In the Chinese population, the stepwise conditional analysis revealed additional independent associations at HLA-A*02:07 (Pcondition=5.30 × 10−40 after conditioning on HLA-C*06:02), amino-acid position 67 of HLA-B (Pcondition=8.96 × 10−25 after conditioning on HLA-C*06:02 and HLA-A*02:07), the quad-allelic amino-acid position 114 of HLA-A (Pcondition=6.04 × 10−13 after conditioning on three HLA variants) and rs3131857 (Pcondition= 9.76 × 10−8 after conditioning on all four HLA variants; Supplementary Table 7). Rs3131857 tags (r2=0.72) the biallelic amino-acid polymorphism at the position 144 of HLA-A (HLA-A_AA_144) (Pcondition=1.55 × 10−6 after conditioning on the prior four HLA variants) and did not show any eQTL effect. Beyond these HLA variants, no other HLA variants or SNPs showed independent association with P<10−7 (Supplementary Table 7 and Supplementary Fig. 5). Although the HLA-C*06:02 and the AA position 67 of HLA-B appear to be shared between Caucasian and Chinese populations, the other independent HLA risk variants differ between the two populations. HLA-A*02:07 shows a strong association in Chinese but is very rare or absent in Europeans, whereas HLA-B*07 shows a strong association in Caucasians but is in turn very rare in Chinese. The other HLA variants are common (>10%) in both Caucasian and Chinese, but show population-specific associations, HLA-A*02:01 for Caucasian and the AA positions 114 and 144 of HLA-A for Chinese. Our findings indicate that all three major HLA class I genes may play an important role in psoriasis, and more importantly, illustrate a complex and heterogeneous pattern of HLA associations between Caucasian and Chinese populations.

Analysis of Ethnic Heterogeneity

To further investigate the ethnic heterogeneity of psoriasis susceptibility, we compared the association signals of 44 confirmed (40 previously reported and 4 newly discovered) non-MHC loci between the Caucasian and Chinese cohorts, searching for the loci where association effects are mapped to different independent SNPs in two populations (allelic heterogeneity) or only detected in one population (locus heterogeneity). Of the 44 loci, we did not observe evidence of genetic heterogeneity among the independent samples of each ethnic population, but found the evidence of population-specific effect at 10 loci (ELMO1, ERAP2, PRDX5, PRM3.SOCS1, RNF114, RUNX1, TP63, TRAF3IP2, TYK2 and ZMIZ1), where the association effect was only detected in the Caucasian samples (Pcorrected<0.05 after correction for 44 independent SNPs tested), but not in the Chinese GWAS samples (P≥0.1; Supplementary Data 1). For each of the nine loci, the Chinese samples provide sufficient statistical power (>95%) for detecting the association effect observed in the Caucasian samples at nominal significance (P<0.05), and the OR estimate was significantly different between the two populations (PQ<0.05). Regional plots of association results clearly demonstrate that besides the top Caucasian SNPs, there are no additional associations within the effective LD of these nine loci in the Chinese samples (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figs 3 and 4). We also constructed a genetic risk score of these ten loci (count of risk alleles carried by an individual) and evaluated its association. Although this genetic risk score shows a highly significant association in Caucasian (P=3.94 × 10−36), there is no evidence of association in the Chinese population (P=0.21; Fig. 5). Taken together, these results provide strong evidence for the population-specific effects of these loci in the Caucasian population.
Figure 3

Odds ratios by the decile of polygenic risk score estimated based the top SNPs within the ten Caucasian-specific loci.

The polygenic risk score (PRS) was calculated based on the ten Caucasian-specific SNPs as described (online Methods). The PRS were converted to deciles (1=lowest, 10=highest RPS), and nine dummy variables created to contrast deciles 2–10 to decile 1 as the reference. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (error bars) were estimated using logistic regression with principal components to control for population stratification.

Figure 4

The regional association plots of IL23R showing allelic heterogeneity.

The relative location of annotated genes and the direction of transcription are shown in the lower portion of the figure, and the chromosomal position is shown on the x axis. The blue line shows the recombination rate (estimated from HapMap data of CEU, CHB and Combined population) across the region (right y axis), and the left y axis shows the significance of the SNP associations (−log10 P). The square indicates the SNPs for conditional analysis (these are the top or secondary SNPs); the circle labelled with rs IDs are reported psoriasis susceptibility SNPs. All circles and squares are colour filled based on the heterogeneity results (I2) in our trans-ethnic meta analysis. (a,b) Unconditional and conditional logistic association results of Caucasian, (c, d) unconditional and conditional logistic association results of Chinese.

Figure 5

The regional association plots of IL28RA shared locus without heterogeneity.

The relative location of annotated genes and the direction of transcription are shown in the lower portion of the figure, and the chromosomal position is shown on the x axis. The blue line shows the recombination rate (estimated from HapMap data of CEU, CHB and combined population) across the region (right y axis), and the left y axis shows the significance of the SNP associations (−log10 P). The square indicates the SNPs for conditional analysis (these are the top or secondary SNPs); the circle labelled with rs IDs are reported psoriasis susceptibility SNPs. All circles and squares are colour filled based on the heterogeneity results (I2) in our trans-ethnic meta analysis. (a,b) Unconditional and conditional logistic association results of Caucasian, (c,d) unconditional and conditional logistic association results of Chinese, (e,f) unconditional and conditional logistic association results of trans-ancestry combined sample.

We have also estimated the contribution of these Caucasian-specific loci to the prevalence difference of psoriasis between the Caucasian and the Chinese populations. By assuming the independent and multiplicative effects of all the ten loci in Caucasians and no genetic effects in Chinese population (OR=1), our analysis indicated that the cumulative effects of these Caucasian-specific loci could explain up to 82.83% of the prevalence difference of psoriasis between the Caucasian and the Chinese populations. Because our Chinese samples only have sufficient power (statistic power>90%) to detect genetic effect of OR=1.15 or higher, our analysis may have overestimated the contribution of these loci to the prevalence difference by assuming that the ORs of these loci in Chinese population equal to 1. Our analysis, however, has clearly demonstrated that the cumulative genetic effects of those Caucasian-specific loci make a significant contribution to the prevalence difference of psoriasis between the Caucasian and the Chinese populations. In addition, the association evidences within the IL23R locus were shown to be consistent with allelic heterogeneity between Caucasian and Chinese. There were two independent associations at rs2295359 and rs12564022 in the Caucasian samples (ORcondition=1.15, Pcondition=8.7 × 10−8 and ORcondition=1.23, Pcondition=9.0 × 10−14 respectively), but only one association at rs2295359 (OR=1.15, P=3.62 × 10−8) in the Chinese (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Data 4). The risk T allele of rs12564022 is more frequent in Chinese than Caucasians, but did not show independent association in Chinese. The haplotypes of the two SNPs showed different associations between the two populations: although the haplotype GC showed similar protective effect in both populations, the other two common haplotypes showed population-specific risk effect with the GT showing risk effect in Caucasian and the AC showing risk effect in Chinese (Supplementary Table 8). The diverse patterns of associations are consistent with different risk variants and thus allelic heterogeneity between the two populations. For the remaining 27 loci, consistent association (OR in the same direction and without evidence of heterogeneity) was observed at either the same SNP or SNPs in high LD between the Caucasian and Chinese populations, and the meta-analysis of the combined Caucasian and Chinese samples revealed stronger evidence for association than the two individual samples (under a fixed effects model; Fig. 4, Supplementary Data 1 and Supplementary Figs 3, 4 and 6). Although not evidence of heterogeneity for the OR estimate, we observed significant frequency difference (PQ<0.05) for three SNPs within COG6, FBXL29 and IL23A/STAT2 between Caucasian and Chinese populations (Supplementary Fig. 7). In addition, we constructed a genetic risk score of the 30 SNPs in these 27 loci and found that the genetic risk score showed a significant difference among 52 Human Genome Diversity Panel (HGDP) populations and a significant correlation with the longitude of population, suggesting that these loci may be under selection and polygenetic adaptation to local environment (Supplementary Fig. 8). In addition, it is also interesting to note that the populations of European origin show higher risk score than the ones of Asian origin (Supplementary Fig. 8), which is consistent with the known higher disease prevalence in Europeans than Asians.

Discussion

TP63 is a strong candidate within the locus 3q11.2. TP63 is a key regulator of mammalian epidermal stratification and keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation process2728 and is expressed significantly in human skin and keratinocyte (Supplementary Tables 9 and 10). The discovery of TP63 as a novel susceptibility locus provides additional biological insight into the role of keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation in the development of psoriasis. It is also interesting to note that TP63 has also been discovered as susceptibility gene for lung and bladder cancers as well as immune and inflammatory response2930313233. Rs8128234 on 21q22 is located within RUNX1. RUNX1 encodes the alpha subunit of core-binding factor, which is a heterodimeric transcription factor that binds to the core element of many enhancers34. RUNX1 gene has been shown to regulate alpha-beta T-cell differentiation and epidermis development (Supplementary Table 9)3536, which are both critical for psoriasis development, and has been implicated in multiple autoimmune-related disease phenotypes including psoriasis3738. Rs9533962 is located in long intergenic non-protein coding RNA LOC144817 (ref. 39). And rs34394770 is an intronic variant within COG6 that encodes a subunit of conserved oligomeric Golgi complex that is required for maintaining normal structure and activity of the Golgi apparatus40. Rs34394770 is in high LD with previously reported rs7993214 in Caucasian population (r2>0.98, D′>0.99)41, and our study has therefore confirmed the previously suggested association of COG6 at genome-wide significance. The enrichment analysis of the previously and newly discovered loci has implicated a number of biological processes (gene ontology (GO) terms), which suggest the important roles of immune system and transcriptional regulation in psoriasis development (Supplementary Table 11). We confirmed that there were multiple susceptible signals for psoriasis in MHC region. Besides HLA-C*0602, it was shown that common risk amino acid of HLA-B at position 67 in both Caucasian and Chinese, which was also consistent with the finding in a recent study42. We observed the significant allele frequency difference of some HLA risk alleles, such as HLA-A*02:07 and HLA-B*07, between Caucasian and Chinese populations, which could be a result of strong selection against diverse pathogens between the two ethnic populations43. We also observed the population-specific effects of the AA positions 114 and 144 of HLA-A as well as another 10 non-MHC loci. These population-specific effects suggest a substantial genetic heterogeneity of psoriasis susceptibility between ethnic populations, which could be a result of different evolutionary process and environmental exposures that were experienced by two populations. Such population-specific effects could also be a reflection of potential clinical differences (such as clinical subtypes and family history) between Caucasian and Chinese patients used in the current study, but such a impact should be limited due to the fact that all the Caucasian and Chinese patients used in the current study were recruited by using the same criteria. Further stratified studies, such as by clinical subtypes and family history, can help to gain better understanding on the genetic heterogeneity of psoriasis susceptibility between Caucasian and Chinese populations. In summary, we have conducted the first large-scale trans-ethnic GWMA in psoriasis and discovered seven novel associations, including four novel susceptibility loci and three novel independent associations within previous known loci. The new loci implicate additional players of the immune and keratinocyte development mechanism of psoriasis. In addition, we have investigated the genetic heterogeneity of psoriasis susceptibility by directly comparing the evidences of association of all the 45 confirmed loci between Caucasian and Chinese populations. Although many loci show consistent associations between the two ethnic populations, Caucasian-specific effect was observed for ten loci whose effects contribute significantly to the higher prevalence of psoriasis in Caucasian than in Chinese population. And the comparison of the shared loci across world populations has provided further evidence for the contribution of genetic susceptibility loci to disease prevalence difference between populations. In conclusion, our trans-ethnic genome-wide study has advanced the understanding of the genetic architecture of psoriasis susceptibility by discovering novel associations as well as revealing genetic heterogeneity across different ethnic populations.

Methods

Study subjects

The samples included in the five GWAS (University of California (UC), The Genetic Association Information Network (GAIN), Kiel, Genizon and Anhui) were previously published1516. The UC data set included 202 psoriatic cases and 492 controls of European ancestry. The data set used for the analyses in GAIN of GWAS stage were obtained from the database of Genotype and Phenotype at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap through database of Genotype and Phenotype accession number (phs000019.v1.p1). The Kiel sample included 471 cases and 1,129 controls, and the Genizon data from Canada included 1,755 samples. Anhui data set was comprised of 1,139 cases and 1,112 healthy controls in Han Chinese (Table 1). KI and Singapore data sets included samples of European descent from Sweden and Han Chinese from Singapore, respectively. The Singapore study included additional controls from Singapore Prospective Study Program (SP2). Replication analysis were performed in seven independent samples, six from populations of European descent (UC, KI, Harvard, Spain, Celera, Kiel) and one from Chinese population (Anhui). Recruitment of participants for all studies was approved by the local institutional ethics review boards, Institute of Dermatology, Anhui Medical University, National Skin Centre and National University of Singapore, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, University of California San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Celera, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), in adherence with the Declaration of Helsinki Principles. DNA was isolated from blood using standard methods.

Genome-wide genotyping analysis

The genotyping and the QC procedures of the five published GWAS data sets can be found in the previous publications1516. The cases of the Singapore GWAS data set were genotyped by using the Illumina Human550 BeadChip, whereas the controls were genotyped by using Illumina Human550, Illumina Human610 Quad and 1Mduo3 BeadChip. The cases and controls of the KI data set were genotyped by using Illumina Human Hap550 BeadChip. Standard QC procedures were applied as previously in Singapore and KI cohorts15. Briefly, samples with call rate of <0.95 and SNPs with mean BeadStudio GenCall score of <0.7, call rate of<0.95, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) P value of <1 × 10−6 or minor allele frequency (MAF) of <0.01 were excluded. Cryptic relatedness between individuals was identified through a full identity-by-state matrix. Population substructure of the Singapore and KI data sets was ascertained using principal components analyses (PCAs) with the EIGENSTRAT programme44 with respect to four population panels in the HapMap samples (CEU, CHB, JPT, YRI). The final Singapore and KI data sets consisted of 461,696 SNPs in 2,883 samples and 522,758 SNPs in 1,925 samples, respectively (Table 1).

Whole-genome imputation

Whole-genome imputation was performed by using the IMPUTE version 2 (ref. 45), and the East Asia (ASN) and Europe (EUR) haplotypes of the 1000 Genomes Project reference panel (Dec 2010 version) were used as reference for imputation of Chinese (ASN) and European (EUR) samples, respectively 46. Imputation was performed in each of the seven GWAS data sets individually and by using those SNPs that passed QC thresholds (mean call rate >0.95, MAF>0.01, HWE P>1 × 10−6 in controls). SNPs with impute information less than 80%, MAF less than 1% and HWE P in controls less than 1 × 10−6 were excluded from further analysis. To determine whether specific coding variants within HLA genes contribute to the diverse association signals, we imputed classical HLA alleles and coding variants across the HLA region (chr6:20–40 Mb build 36) in each of the seven data sets. The five European data sets were imputed using a reference panel constructed using 2,767 individuals from the MHC Working Group of the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC)47. The two Chinese data sets were imputed using a reference panel constructed using genotypes from 89 Chinese (CHB) and Japanese (JPT) samples from the HapMap project48. Each reference panel was constructed using dense SNP genotype data and classical HLA alleles determined to four-digit resolution. Based on the EMBL-EBI Immunogenetics HLA Database, amino-acid variants were coded in as binary markers (present/absent) in the reference panel. Imputation of classical HLA alleles and their corresponding amino acids were performed using BEAGLE as previously described4749. A total of 253 classical HLA alleles (two- and four-digit resolution) and 357 amino-acid positions were imputed in the European samples, and 167 classical alleles and 305 amino-acid positions were imputed in the Chinese samples.

Genomic controls

We used PCA-based method to analyse and detect population stratification in individual GWAS data set. Principal component adjustments were performed in four data sets, respectively (one, one, two, three principal components (PCs) for Anhui, KI, UC and Kiel cohorts, respectively), to adjust for population stratification. This reduced the extent of genome-wide inflation to <1.05 in all individual GWAS study (Table 1), a level considered acceptable by conventional GWAS standard. The cases and controls of the Singapore data set were well matched, and no PCA-based correction was performed. The final inflation factors of the test statistics were modest (λ1,000=1.017, 1.01 and 1.011 for the Caucasian, Chinese and combined discovery cohorts, respectively; Table 1), which suggested that the final association results from the three genome-wide analysis were largely free from major inflation because of population stratification.

Association analysis

Genome-wide meta analyses (GWMA) were performed in this study: (i) Caucasian data (N=8,682, 4,778,154 SNPs); (ii) Han Chinese data (N=5,134, 4,562,294 SNPs); (iii) combined data (N=13,816, 3,621,551 SNPs). The association analyses were done in the imputed dosage data using SNPtest v2 using score test, with the study and principal components (for four data sets) included as covariates to adjust for study effect and population stratification (Table 1). We also applied DerSimonian-Laid random effect model to detect ethnic heterogeneity by using odds ratio estimates and standard errors from GWMA of Caucasian and GWMA of Chinese data as the inputs. Association evidence from replication study was tested using an inverse variance meta-analysis assuming fixed-effects, with a Cochran's Q test and I2 to assess between-study heterogeneity. A P<5 × 10−8 was used as threshold for genome-wide significance. In HLA region, association tests were performed on genotype dosages as determined from the imputed genotype probabilities, which would account for any uncertainties in the imputed genotypes. We conducted Wald tests on all the imputed bi-allelic variants, adjusting for study variables and principal components as covariates. For multiallelic amino-acid sites, we performed the global ‘omnibus' test at each site taking into account all alleles at each multiallelic position. The omnibus test was performed as previously described50, in summary: convert k-alleles to k-1 bi-alleles, invoke the glm function in R to estimate the multivariate model, and use the likelihood ratio test to compute the global multiallelic test P-values. All conditional logistic regression analyses were done using R.

SNP selection and replication

We selected 43 SNPs with suggestive evidence of association (P<5 × 10−5 from the single variant logistic regression analysis) in at least one meta-analysis (Caucasian, Chinese and Combined) for the independent validation analysis. The Sequenom MassArray system was used for most of the replication studies, except for Celera samples, where 30 SNPs were genotyped using TaqMan assays (Life Technologies), and Han Chinese samples, where 12 SNPs were genotyped using TaqMan assays.

Conditional analysis

To detect novel secondary association signals, we performed conditional analysis in 45 regions (41 known GWAS loci and 4 novel loci). Secondary SNPs with conditional P<5 × 10−8 was then assumed to be independent from the lead SNP in this region. The P values in multivariate analysis were reported after adjusting for the leading SNPs.

Functional annotation and eQTL analysis

We annotated the four novel SNPs and their linked SNPs in 1000 Genomes Project Phase 1 CEU panel (r2>0.8) using HaploReg 2 (http://www.broadinstitute.org/mammals/haploreg/haploreg.php). We further performed their eQTL analyses using the following recently published eQTL data sets: (i) a meta-analysis of the transcriptional profiles from the peripheral blood cells of 5,311 Europeans (http://genenetwork.nl/bloodeqtlbrowser)51; (ii) the transcriptional profile from primary B cells and monocytes in 288 healthy Europeans52; (iii) the eqtl.uchicago browser with compiled data across diverse tissues.

GO enrichment analysis

We submitted the 54 implicated genes (Supplementary Data 1) to the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID)53 for GO term enrichment analysis based on GO level. Fisher's exact test was implemented in DAVID to compute the enrichment P value for each GO term. We excluded the HLA region in this analysis. And we only reported the significant results at P<10−4.

Ethnic heterogeneity

To compare the ethnic heterogeneity of susceptibility in psoriasis, we selected from the 44 non-MHC confirmed SNPs or proxy SNPs with considerate LD for validation mostly in our GWAS samples. Based on the comparisons between reference allele frequency and the association results, ethnic heterogeneity was categorized into three types: (i) loci with common variants, in which the same susceptible signals existed in Caucasian and Chinese Han; (ii) loci ethnic specific, in which there was significant association evidence only in one specific race (locus heterogeneity); (iii) Loci with allelic heterogeneity, in which the association in diverse populations showed obvious different causal variants.

Geospatial risk analysis for 27 shared loci (30 SNPs) on HGDP

To assess the geospatial pattern of genetic risk, we used the publicly available genotype data from the HGDP with 1,043 individuals of 52 worldwide populations. The genotypes were generated on Illumina 650Y arrays for 660,918 markers (Stanford University). This high-quality genotype data (overall sample call rate >98.5%) was available for 10 out of 30 shared SNPs. The QC had been done before imputing the missing genotyped SNPs. Eighty-eight individuals were removed because of low heterozygosity rate and first-degree relatives and markers excluded with low call rate (<95%) and MAF (<0.01). Using the remaining data set with 955 individuals (52 populations) and 630,559 markers, the whole-genome imputation was performed using 1000 Genome Projects data set (Phase I, Dec. 2013 version) as reference panel. All 30 SNPs were imputed with high confidence (impute info 0.90 or above), and MAF bigger than 0.05. For each individual (j), the genetic risk score of multiple locus (m) was estimated by where was the log of adjusted meta-OR for each locus, G was the number of risk alleles at each locus. The standardized risk score was calculated using a z-score method across populations by The median of standardized risk score was compared among 52 worldwide populations by Kruskal–Wallis test. The standardized risk score was correlated with longitude, latitude of the population.

Odds ratio by risk score profile of ten population-specific loci

For this purpose, the polygenic risk score (PRS) for each individual was calculated as counts of risk alleles of ten population-specific loci54. The OR was estimated using logistic regression on PRS with adjustment of PCs to control for population stratification. There are seven cohorts (two for Chinese and five for Caucasian) in the discovery stage of this study. The adjusted ORs were estimated individually for seven cohorts. Meta-analysis was performed separately in Chinese and Caucasian using PLINK v1.07. To analyse the ORs by risk score profile, the PRS was converted to deciles (1=lowest, 10=highest PRS). Nine dummy variables were created to compare 2–10 to decile 1 as the reference. ORs by deciles were estimated by logistic regression with PCs adjusted. The ORs were combined separately in Chinese and Caucasian using META v1.5 with fixed effects model. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated by exp(BETA±1.96*SE).

Difference in prevalence between Chinese and Caucasian accounted for by ten population-specific loci

The method was modified based on Supplementary Methods published by William et al.55. We modelled the psoriasis prevalence accounted for by the ten Caucasian-specific loci in both Caucasian and Han Chinese and determined the amount of psoriasis prevalence would be reduced if the ten SNPs were absent from each population. The psoriasis prevalence was about ten times higher in Caucasian (2.5%) than in Chinese (0.2%). So we calculated estimates of reduction relative to the impact sum of the ten SNPs on Chinese prevalence. We applied a standard log-additive effect model and used population-based ORs from either Chinese (OR=1) or Caucasian (ORs from the current study) and assumed the OR was a good estimate of relative risk, R. We also assumed these ten loci contributed to the risk of psoriasis independently, and they exerted additive risk effect in total. Then, the overall psoriasis prevalence in population P was modelled as: , where KPA was the disease prevalence if all loci were absent from the population, m was the number of loci, p was the frequency of non-risk allele for ith loci, q the frequency of risk allele for ith loci. We then calculated the proportion of prevalence in difference in Caucasian (CA) and Chinese (CH) accounted for by ten loci by Where KCA was the overall prevalence in Caucasian and KCH the overall prevalence in Chinese.

Co-expression-driven gene functional prediction

We used a described method to shed insight into the putative functions of the biological implicated genes in our study (http://genenetwork.nl:8080/GeneNetwork/)56. Gene function prediction is based on the idea that genes with shared expression profiles are likely to have related biological functions. The method uses data on co-expression profiles to predict the likely functions of as-of-yet uncharacterized genes and refine our understanding of the function of other genes. To apply the method, we queried the co-expression database with our four novel genes. The query for each gene returned the probable function of the gene or the reconstituted pathway in which it operates. The database was generated by linking information about gene expression obtained from published data on approximately 80,000 gene expression profiles (from the database Gene Expression Omnibus).

Author contributions

J.J.L., X.J.Z., M. Seielstad, W.L., M. Ståhle and A.F. organized and designed the study. J.J.L., X.J.Z., M. Seielstad, W.L., M. Ståhle and A.F. conducted and supervised the genotyping of samples. X.Y.Y., H.Q.L., L.W., J.N.F, Y.L., P.D.B. and J.J.L. contributed to the design and execution of statistical analyses. X.Y.Y., H.Q.L., L.W. and J.J.L. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Y.H.L., E.E., J.L.H., X.E., L.D.S., X.B.Z., C.B.S., C.H.Z., A.P.Z., F.S., L.P., J.J.C., G.G.K., K.P.C., S.M., M.W., S.W., W.L., K.S., Y.Y.T., C.T.S.T., R.G., A.B., P.L.D.J. and A.A.Q. contributed samples to the GWAS and/or follow-up genotyping. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Yin, X. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies multiple novel associations and ethnic heterogeneity of psoriasis susceptibility. Nat. Commun. 6:6916 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7916 (2015).
  56 in total

1.  Complete sequencing and characterization of 21,243 full-length human cDNAs.

Authors:  Toshio Ota; Yutaka Suzuki; Tetsuo Nishikawa; Tetsuji Otsuki; Tomoyasu Sugiyama; Ryotaro Irie; Ai Wakamatsu; Koji Hayashi; Hiroyuki Sato; Keiichi Nagai; Kouichi Kimura; Hiroshi Makita; Mitsuo Sekine; Masaya Obayashi; Tatsunari Nishi; Toshikazu Shibahara; Toshihiro Tanaka; Shizuko Ishii; Jun-ichi Yamamoto; Kaoru Saito; Yuri Kawai; Yuko Isono; Yoshitaka Nakamura; Kenji Nagahari; Katsuhiko Murakami; Tomohiro Yasuda; Takao Iwayanagi; Masako Wagatsuma; Akiko Shiratori; Hiroaki Sudo; Takehiko Hosoiri; Yoshiko Kaku; Hiroyo Kodaira; Hiroshi Kondo; Masanori Sugawara; Makiko Takahashi; Katsuhiro Kanda; Takahide Yokoi; Takako Furuya; Emiko Kikkawa; Yuhi Omura; Kumi Abe; Kumiko Kamihara; Naoko Katsuta; Kazuomi Sato; Machiko Tanikawa; Makoto Yamazaki; Ken Ninomiya; Tadashi Ishibashi; Hiromichi Yamashita; Katsuji Murakawa; Kiyoshi Fujimori; Hiroyuki Tanai; Manabu Kimata; Motoji Watanabe; Susumu Hiraoka; Yoshiyuki Chiba; Shinichi Ishida; Yukio Ono; Sumiyo Takiguchi; Susumu Watanabe; Makoto Yosida; Tomoko Hotuta; Junko Kusano; Keiichi Kanehori; Asako Takahashi-Fujii; Hiroto Hara; Tomo-o Tanase; Yoshiko Nomura; Sakae Togiya; Fukuyo Komai; Reiko Hara; Kazuha Takeuchi; Miho Arita; Nobuyuki Imose; Kaoru Musashino; Hisatsugu Yuuki; Atsushi Oshima; Naokazu Sasaki; Satoshi Aotsuka; Yoko Yoshikawa; Hiroshi Matsunawa; Tatsuo Ichihara; Namiko Shiohata; Sanae Sano; Shogo Moriya; Hiroko Momiyama; Noriko Satoh; Sachiko Takami; Yuko Terashima; Osamu Suzuki; Satoshi Nakagawa; Akihiro Senoh; Hiroshi Mizoguchi; Yoshihiro Goto; Fumio Shimizu; Hirokazu Wakebe; Haretsugu Hishigaki; Takeshi Watanabe; Akio Sugiyama; Makoto Takemoto; Bunsei Kawakami; Masaaki Yamazaki; Koji Watanabe; Ayako Kumagai; Shoko Itakura; Yasuhito Fukuzumi; Yoshifumi Fujimori; Megumi Komiyama; Hiroyuki Tashiro; Akira Tanigami; Tsutomu Fujiwara; Toshihide Ono; Katsue Yamada; Yuka Fujii; Kouichi Ozaki; Maasa Hirao; Yoshihiro Ohmori; Ayako Kawabata; Takeshi Hikiji; Naoko Kobatake; Hiromi Inagaki; Yasuko Ikema; Sachiko Okamoto; Rie Okitani; Takuma Kawakami; Saori Noguchi; Tomoko Itoh; Keiko Shigeta; Tadashi Senba; Kyoka Matsumura; Yoshie Nakajima; Takae Mizuno; Misato Morinaga; Masahide Sasaki; Takushi Togashi; Masaaki Oyama; Hiroko Hata; Manabu Watanabe; Takami Komatsu; Junko Mizushima-Sugano; Tadashi Satoh; Yuko Shirai; Yukiko Takahashi; Kiyomi Nakagawa; Koji Okumura; Takahiro Nagase; Nobuo Nomura; Hisashi Kikuchi; Yasuhiko Masuho; Riu Yamashita; Kenta Nakai; Tetsushi Yada; Yusuke Nakamura; Osamu Ohara; Takao Isogai; Sumio Sugano
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-12-21       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  Interplay of transcription factors in T-cell differentiation and function: the role of Runx.

Authors:  Won Fen Wong; Kazuyoshi Kohu; Tomoki Chiba; Takehito Sato; Masanobu Satake
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Variation in TP63 is associated with lung adenocarcinoma susceptibility in Japanese and Korean populations.

Authors:  Daiki Miki; Michiaki Kubo; Atsushi Takahashi; Kyong-Ah Yoon; Jeongseon Kim; Geon Kook Lee; Jae Ill Zo; Jin Soo Lee; Naoya Hosono; Takashi Morizono; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Naoyuki Kamatani; Kazuaki Chayama; Takashi Takahashi; Johji Inazawa; Yusuke Nakamura; Yataro Daigo
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  The major genetic determinants of HIV-1 control affect HLA class I peptide presentation.

Authors:  Florencia Pereyra; Xiaoming Jia; Paul J McLaren; Amalio Telenti; Paul I W de Bakker; Bruce D Walker; Stephan Ripke; Chanson J Brumme; Sara L Pulit; Mary Carrington; Carl M Kadie; Jonathan M Carlson; David Heckerman; Robert R Graham; Robert M Plenge; Steven G Deeks; Lauren Gianniny; Gabriel Crawford; Jordan Sullivan; Elena Gonzalez; Leela Davies; Amy Camargo; Jamie M Moore; Nicole Beattie; Supriya Gupta; Andrew Crenshaw; Noël P Burtt; Candace Guiducci; Namrata Gupta; Xiaojiang Gao; Ying Qi; Yuko Yuki; Alicja Piechocka-Trocha; Emily Cutrell; Rachel Rosenberg; Kristin L Moss; Paul Lemay; Jessica O'Leary; Todd Schaefer; Pranshu Verma; Ildiko Toth; Brian Block; Brett Baker; Alissa Rothchild; Jeffrey Lian; Jacqueline Proudfoot; Donna Marie L Alvino; Seanna Vine; Marylyn M Addo; Todd M Allen; Marcus Altfeld; Matthew R Henn; Sylvie Le Gall; Hendrik Streeck; David W Haas; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Gregory K Robbins; Robert W Shafer; Roy M Gulick; Cecilia M Shikuma; Richard Haubrich; Sharon Riddler; Paul E Sax; Eric S Daar; Heather J Ribaudo; Brian Agan; Shanu Agarwal; Richard L Ahern; Brady L Allen; Sherly Altidor; Eric L Altschuler; Sujata Ambardar; Kathryn Anastos; Ben Anderson; Val Anderson; Ushan Andrady; Diana Antoniskis; David Bangsberg; Daniel Barbaro; William Barrie; J Bartczak; Simon Barton; Patricia Basden; Nesli Basgoz; Suzane Bazner; Nicholaos C Bellos; Anne M Benson; Judith Berger; Nicole F Bernard; Annette M Bernard; Christopher Birch; Stanley J Bodner; Robert K Bolan; Emilie T Boudreaux; Meg Bradley; James F Braun; Jon E Brndjar; Stephen J Brown; Katherine Brown; Sheldon T Brown; Jedidiah Burack; Larry M Bush; Virginia Cafaro; Omobolaji Campbell; John Campbell; Robert H Carlson; J Kevin Carmichael; Kathleen K Casey; Chris Cavacuiti; Gregory Celestin; Steven T Chambers; Nancy Chez; Lisa M Chirch; Paul J Cimoch; Daniel Cohen; Lillian E Cohn; Brian Conway; David A Cooper; Brian Cornelson; David T Cox; Michael V Cristofano; George Cuchural; Julie L Czartoski; Joseph M Dahman; Jennifer S Daly; Benjamin T Davis; Kristine Davis; Sheila M Davod; Edwin DeJesus; Craig A Dietz; Eleanor Dunham; Michael E Dunn; Todd B Ellerin; Joseph J Eron; John J W Fangman; Claire E Farel; Helen Ferlazzo; Sarah Fidler; Anita Fleenor-Ford; Renee Frankel; Kenneth A Freedberg; Neel K French; Jonathan D Fuchs; Jon D Fuller; Jonna Gaberman; Joel E Gallant; Rajesh T Gandhi; Efrain Garcia; Donald Garmon; Joseph C Gathe; Cyril R Gaultier; Wondwoosen Gebre; Frank D Gilman; Ian Gilson; Paul A Goepfert; Michael S Gottlieb; Claudia Goulston; Richard K Groger; T Douglas Gurley; Stuart Haber; Robin Hardwicke; W David Hardy; P Richard Harrigan; Trevor N Hawkins; Sonya Heath; Frederick M Hecht; W Keith Henry; Melissa Hladek; Robert P Hoffman; James M Horton; Ricky K Hsu; Gregory D Huhn; Peter Hunt; Mark J Hupert; Mark L Illeman; Hans Jaeger; Robert M Jellinger; Mina John; Jennifer A Johnson; Kristin L Johnson; Heather Johnson; Kay Johnson; Jennifer Joly; Wilbert C Jordan; Carol A Kauffman; Homayoon Khanlou; Robert K Killian; Arthur Y Kim; David D Kim; Clifford A Kinder; Jeffrey T Kirchner; Laura Kogelman; Erna Milunka Kojic; P Todd Korthuis; Wayne Kurisu; Douglas S Kwon; Melissa LaMar; Harry Lampiris; Massimiliano Lanzafame; Michael M Lederman; David M Lee; Jean M L Lee; Marah J Lee; Edward T Y Lee; Janice Lemoine; Jay A Levy; Josep M Llibre; Michael A Liguori; Susan J Little; Anne Y Liu; Alvaro J Lopez; Mono R Loutfy; Dawn Loy; Debbie Y Mohammed; Alan Man; Michael K Mansour; Vincent C Marconi; Martin Markowitz; Rui Marques; Jeffrey N Martin; Harold L Martin; Kenneth Hugh Mayer; M Juliana McElrath; Theresa A McGhee; Barbara H McGovern; Katherine McGowan; Dawn McIntyre; Gavin X Mcleod; Prema Menezes; Greg Mesa; Craig E Metroka; Dirk Meyer-Olson; Andy O Miller; Kate Montgomery; Karam C Mounzer; Ellen H Nagami; Iris Nagin; Ronald G Nahass; Margret O Nelson; Craig Nielsen; David L Norene; David H O'Connor; Bisola O Ojikutu; Jason Okulicz; Olakunle O Oladehin; Edward C Oldfield; Susan A Olender; Mario Ostrowski; William F Owen; Eunice Pae; Jeffrey Parsonnet; Andrew M Pavlatos; Aaron M Perlmutter; Michael N Pierce; Jonathan M Pincus; Leandro Pisani; Lawrence Jay Price; Laurie Proia; Richard C Prokesch; Heather Calderon Pujet; Moti Ramgopal; Almas Rathod; Michael Rausch; J Ravishankar; Frank S Rhame; Constance Shamuyarira Richards; Douglas D Richman; Berta Rodes; Milagros Rodriguez; Richard C Rose; Eric S Rosenberg; Daniel Rosenthal; Polly E Ross; David S Rubin; Elease Rumbaugh; Luis Saenz; Michelle R Salvaggio; William C Sanchez; Veeraf M Sanjana; Steven Santiago; Wolfgang Schmidt; Hanneke Schuitemaker; Philip M Sestak; Peter Shalit; William Shay; Vivian N Shirvani; Vanessa I Silebi; James M Sizemore; Paul R Skolnik; Marcia Sokol-Anderson; James M Sosman; Paul Stabile; Jack T Stapleton; Sheree Starrett; Francine Stein; Hans-Jurgen Stellbrink; F Lisa Sterman; Valerie E Stone; David R Stone; Giuseppe Tambussi; Randy A Taplitz; Ellen M Tedaldi; Amalio Telenti; William Theisen; Richard Torres; Lorraine Tosiello; Cecile Tremblay; Marc A Tribble; Phuong D Trinh; Alice Tsao; Peggy Ueda; Anthony Vaccaro; Emilia Valadas; Thanes J Vanig; Isabel Vecino; Vilma M Vega; Wenoah Veikley; Barbara H Wade; Charles Walworth; Chingchai Wanidworanun; Douglas J Ward; Daniel A Warner; Robert D Weber; Duncan Webster; Steve Weis; David A Wheeler; David J White; Ed Wilkins; Alan Winston; Clifford G Wlodaver; Angelique van't Wout; David P Wright; Otto O Yang; David L Yurdin; Brandon W Zabukovic; Kimon C Zachary; Beth Zeeman; Meng Zhao
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Association analyses identify six new psoriasis susceptibility loci in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Liang-Dan Sun; Hui Cheng; Zai-Xing Wang; An-Ping Zhang; Pei-Guang Wang; Jin-Hua Xu; Qi-Xing Zhu; Hai-Sheng Zhou; Eva Ellinghaus; Fu-Ren Zhang; Xiong-Ming Pu; Xue-Qin Yang; Jian-Zhong Zhang; Ai-E Xu; Ri-Na Wu; Li-Min Xu; Lin Peng; Cynthia A Helms; Yun-Qing Ren; Chi Zhang; Shu-Mei Zhang; Rajan P Nair; Hong-Yan Wang; Guo-Shu Lin; Philip E Stuart; Xing Fan; Gang Chen; Trilokraj Tejasvi; Pan Li; Jun Zhu; Zhi-Ming Li; Hong-Mei Ge; Michael Weichenthal; Wen-Zheng Ye; Cheng Zhang; Song-Ke Shen; Bao-Qi Yang; Yuan-Yuan Sun; Shan-Shan Li; Yan Lin; Jian-Hua Jiang; Cun-Tao Li; Ri-Xin Chen; Juan Cheng; Xin Jiang; Peng Zhang; Wei-Min Song; Jin Tang; Hao-Qin Zhang; Li Sun; Jing Cui; Li-Jun Zhang; Biao Tang; Fei Huang; Qian Qin; Xiao-Ping Pei; Ai-Min Zhou; Li-Mei Shao; Jian-Lan Liu; Feng-Yu Zhang; Wei-Dong Du; Andre Franke; Anne M Bowcock; James T Elder; Jian-Jun Liu; Sen Yang; Xue-Jun Zhang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Genome-wide association study identifies a psoriasis susceptibility locus at TRAF3IP2.

Authors:  Eva Ellinghaus; David Ellinghaus; Philip E Stuart; Rajan P Nair; Sophie Debrus; John V Raelson; Majid Belouchi; Hélène Fournier; Claudia Reinhard; Jun Ding; Yun Li; Trilokraj Tejasvi; Johann Gudjonsson; Stefan W Stoll; John J Voorhees; Sylviane Lambert; Stephan Weidinger; Bernadette Eberlein; Manfred Kunz; Proton Rahman; Dafna D Gladman; Christian Gieger; H Erich Wichmann; Tom H Karlsen; Gabriele Mayr; Mario Albrecht; Dieter Kabelitz; Ulrich Mrowietz; Gonçalo R Abecasis; James T Elder; Stefan Schreiber; Michael Weichenthal; Andre Franke
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Genome-wide association analysis identifies three psoriasis susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Philip E Stuart; Rajan P Nair; Eva Ellinghaus; Jun Ding; Trilokraj Tejasvi; Johann E Gudjonsson; Yun Li; Stephan Weidinger; Bernadette Eberlein; Christian Gieger; H Erich Wichmann; Manfred Kunz; Robert Ike; Gerald G Krueger; Anne M Bowcock; Ulrich Mrowietz; Henry W Lim; John J Voorhees; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Michael Weichenthal; Andre Franke; Proton Rahman; Dafna D Gladman; James T Elder
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  A putative RUNX1 binding site variant between SLC9A3R1 and NAT9 is associated with susceptibility to psoriasis.

Authors:  Cynthia Helms; Li Cao; James G Krueger; Ellen M Wijsman; Francesca Chamian; Derek Gordon; Michael Heffernan; Jil A Wright Daw; Jason Robarge; Jurg Ott; Pui-Yan Kwok; Alan Menter; Anne M Bowcock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-11-09       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  A genome-wide association study identifies new psoriasis susceptibility loci and an interaction between HLA-C and ERAP1.

Authors:  Amy Strange; Francesca Capon; Chris C A Spencer; Jo Knight; Michael E Weale; Michael H Allen; Anne Barton; Gavin Band; Céline Bellenguez; Judith G M Bergboer; Jenefer M Blackwell; Elvira Bramon; Suzannah J Bumpstead; Juan P Casas; Michael J Cork; Aiden Corvin; Panos Deloukas; Alexander Dilthey; Audrey Duncanson; Sarah Edkins; Xavier Estivill; Oliver Fitzgerald; Colin Freeman; Emiliano Giardina; Emma Gray; Angelika Hofer; Ulrike Hüffmeier; Sarah E Hunt; Alan D Irvine; Janusz Jankowski; Brian Kirby; Cordelia Langford; Jesús Lascorz; Joyce Leman; Stephen Leslie; Lotus Mallbris; Hugh S Markus; Christopher G Mathew; W H Irwin McLean; Ross McManus; Rotraut Mössner; Loukas Moutsianas; Asa T Naluai; Frank O Nestle; Giuseppe Novelli; Alexandros Onoufriadis; Colin N A Palmer; Carlo Perricone; Matti Pirinen; Robert Plomin; Simon C Potter; Ramon M Pujol; Anna Rautanen; Eva Riveira-Munoz; Anthony W Ryan; Wolfgang Salmhofer; Lena Samuelsson; Stephen J Sawcer; Joost Schalkwijk; Catherine H Smith; Mona Ståhle; Zhan Su; Rachid Tazi-Ahnini; Heiko Traupe; Ananth C Viswanathan; Richard B Warren; Wolfgang Weger; Katarina Wolk; Nicholas Wood; Jane Worthington; Helen S Young; Patrick L J M Zeeuwen; Adrian Hayday; A David Burden; Christopher E M Griffiths; Juha Kere; André Reis; Gilean McVean; David M Evans; Matthew A Brown; Jonathan N Barker; Leena Peltonen; Peter Donnelly; Richard C Trembath
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  A multi-stage genome-wide association study of bladder cancer identifies multiple susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Nathaniel Rothman; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Nuria Malats; Xifeng Wu; Jonine D Figueroa; Francisco X Real; David Van Den Berg; Giuseppe Matullo; Dalsu Baris; Michael Thun; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Paolo Vineis; Immaculata De Vivo; Demetrius Albanes; Mark P Purdue; Thorunn Rafnar; Michelle A T Hildebrandt; Anne E Kiltie; Olivier Cussenot; Klaus Golka; Rajiv Kumar; Jack A Taylor; Jose I Mayordomo; Kevin B Jacobs; Manolis Kogevinas; Amy Hutchinson; Zhaoming Wang; Yi-Ping Fu; Ludmila Prokunina-Olsson; Laurie Burdett; Meredith Yeager; William Wheeler; Adonina Tardón; Consol Serra; Alfredo Carrato; Reina García-Closas; Josep Lloreta; Alison Johnson; Molly Schwenn; Margaret R Karagas; Alan Schned; Gerald Andriole; Robert Grubb; Amanda Black; Eric J Jacobs; W Ryan Diver; Susan M Gapstur; Stephanie J Weinstein; Jarmo Virtamo; Victoria K Cortessis; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Malcolm C Pike; Mariana C Stern; Jian-Min Yuan; David J Hunter; Monica McGrath; Colin P Dinney; Bogdan Czerniak; Meng Chen; Hushan Yang; Sita H Vermeulen; Katja K Aben; J Alfred Witjes; Remco R Makkinje; Patrick Sulem; Soren Besenbacher; Kari Stefansson; Elio Riboli; Paul Brennan; Salvatore Panico; Carmen Navarro; Naomi E Allen; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Neil Caporaso; Maria Teresa Landi; Federico Canzian; Borje Ljungberg; Anne Tjonneland; Francoise Clavel-Chapelon; David T Bishop; Mark T W Teo; Margaret A Knowles; Simonetta Guarrera; Silvia Polidoro; Fulvio Ricceri; Carlotta Sacerdote; Alessandra Allione; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Silvia Selinski; Jan G Hengstler; Holger Dietrich; Tony Fletcher; Peter Rudnai; Eugen Gurzau; Kvetoslava Koppova; Sophia C E Bolick; Ashley Godfrey; Zongli Xu; José I Sanz-Velez; María D García-Prats; Manuel Sanchez; Gabriel Valdivia; Stefano Porru; Simone Benhamou; Robert N Hoover; Joseph F Fraumeni; Debra T Silverman; Stephen J Chanock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  57 in total

1.  Antimicrobial Peptide LL37 and MAVS Signaling Drive Interferon-β Production by Epidermal Keratinocytes during Skin Injury.

Authors:  Ling-Juan Zhang; George L Sen; Nicole L Ward; Andrew Johnston; Kimberly Chun; Yifang Chen; Christopher Adase; James A Sanford; Nina Gao; Melanie Chensee; Emi Sato; Yi Fritz; Jaymie Baliwag; Michael R Williams; Tissa Hata; Richard L Gallo
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 31.745

2.  Redundancy and Complementarity between ERAP1 and ERAP2 Revealed by their Effects on the Behcet's Disease-associated HLA-B*51 Peptidome.

Authors:  Pablo Guasp; Elena Lorente; Adrian Martín-Esteban; Eilon Barnea; Paolo Romania; Doriana Fruci; JonasJ W Kuiper; Arie Admon; José A López de Castro
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms of IL12B are associated with Takayasu arteritis in Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Xiaoting Wen; Si Chen; Ping Li; Jing Li; Ziyan Wu; Yuan Li; Liubing Li; Hui Yuan; Xinping Tian; Fengchun Zhang; Yongzhe Li
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 4.  Thyroid diseases and skin autoimmunity.

Authors:  Enke Baldini; Teresa Odorisio; Chiara Tuccilli; Severino Persechino; Salvatore Sorrenti; Antonio Catania; Daniele Pironi; Giovanni Carbotta; Laura Giacomelli; Stefano Arcieri; Massimo Vergine; Massimo Monti; Salvatore Ulisse
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.514

5.  The Role of the Transcription Factor Ets1 in Lupus and Other Autoimmune Diseases.

Authors:  Lee Ann Garrett-Sinha; Alyssa Kearly; Anne B Satterthwaite
Journal:  Crit Rev Immunol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Association of IL12B risk haplotype and lack of interaction with HLA-Cw6 among the psoriasis patients in India.

Authors:  Aditi Chandra; Swapan Senapati; Saurabh Ghosh; Gobinda Chatterjee; Raghunath Chatterjee
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  HLA Correlations with Clinical Phenotypes and Risk of Metabolic Comorbidities in Singapore Chinese Psoriasis Patients.

Authors:  Meixin Shen; Soon Wei Daniel Lim; Eugene S Tan; Hazel H Oon; Ee Chee Ren
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 8.  Unmet Needs in the Field of Psoriasis: Pathogenesis and Treatment.

Authors:  Wolf-Henning Boehncke; Nicolo Costantino Brembilla
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 9.  Effects of type 1 diabetes-associated IFIH1 polymorphisms on MDA5 function and expression.

Authors:  Benjamin M Looney; Chang-Qing Xia; Patrick Concannon; David A Ostrov; Michael J Clare-Salzler
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 10.  The immunogenetics of Psoriasis: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Jamie L Harden; James G Krueger; Anne M Bowcock
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 7.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.