Literature DB >> 25902445

Spatiotemporal analysis of different mechanisms for interpreting morphogen gradients.

David M Richards1, Timothy E Saunders2.   

Abstract

During development, multicellular organisms must accurately control both temporal and spatial aspects of tissue patterning. This is often achieved using morphogens, signaling molecules that form spatially varying concentrations and so encode positional information. Typical analysis of morphogens assumes that spatial information is decoded in steady state by measuring the value of the morphogen concentration. However, recent experimental work suggests that both pre-steady-state readout and measurement of spatial and temporal derivatives of the morphogen concentration can play important roles in defining boundaries. Here, we undertake a detailed theoretical and numerical study of the accuracy of patterning-both in space and time-in models where readout is provided not by the morphogen concentration but by its spatial and temporal derivatives. In both cases we find that accurate patterning can be achieved, with sometimes even smaller errors than directly reading the morphogen concentration. We further demonstrate that such models provide other potential benefits to the system, such as the ability to switch on and off gene response with a high degree of spatiotemporal accuracy. Finally, we discuss how such derivatives might be calculated biologically and examine these models in relation to Sonic Hedgehog signaling in the vertebrate central nervous system. We show that, when coupled to a downstream transcriptional network, pre-steady-state measurement of the temporal change in the Shh morphogen is a plausible mechanism for determining precise gene boundaries in both space and time.
Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25902445      PMCID: PMC4407267          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  80 in total

1.  Specificity of Drosophila cytonemes for distinct signaling pathways.

Authors:  Sougata Roy; Frank Hsiung; Thomas B Kornberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Polar gradients of the DYRK-family kinase Pom1 couple cell length with the cell cycle.

Authors:  Sophie G Martin; Martine Berthelot-Grosjean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  When it pays to rush: interpreting morphogen gradients prior to steady-state.

Authors:  Timothy Saunders; Martin Howard
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 4.  Mechanistic insight into how Shh patterns the vertebrate limb.

Authors:  Edwina McGlinn; Clifford J Tabin
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner.

Authors:  W Driever; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Long-range action of Wingless organizes the dorsal-ventral axis of the Drosophila wing.

Authors:  C J Neumann; S M Cohen
Journal:  Development       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Bmp-4 acts as a morphogen in dorsoventral mesoderm patterning in Xenopus.

Authors:  R Dosch; V Gawantka; H Delius; C Blumenstock; C Niehrs
Journal:  Development       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Direct and long-range action of a DPP morphogen gradient.

Authors:  D Nellen; R Burke; G Struhl; K Basler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-05-03       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Mathematical modelling of digit specification by a sonic hedgehog gradient.

Authors:  Thomas E Woolley; Ruth E Baker; Cheryll Tickle; Philip K Maini; Matthew Towers
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.780

10.  The formation of the Bicoid morphogen gradient requires protein movement from anteriorly localized mRNA.

Authors:  Shawn C Little; Gašper Tkačik; Thomas B Kneeland; Eric F Wieschaus; Thomas Gregor
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

1.  Fold-change detection and scale invariance of cell-cell signaling in social amoeba.

Authors:  Keita Kamino; Yohei Kondo; Akihiko Nakajima; Mai Honda-Kitahara; Kunihiko Kaneko; Satoshi Sawai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Intrinsic Noise Profoundly Alters the Dynamics and Steady State of Morphogen-Controlled Bistable Genetic Switches.

Authors:  Ruben Perez-Carrasco; Pilar Guerrero; James Briscoe; Karen M Page
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 3.  Morphogen rules: design principles of gradient-mediated embryo patterning.

Authors:  James Briscoe; Stephen Small
Journal:  Development       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Dynamics robustness of cascading systems.

Authors:  Jonathan T Young; Tetsuhiro S Hatakeyama; Kunihiko Kaneko
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.