| Literature DB >> 25900915 |
Qian Wang-Lopez1, Nassera Chalabi2, Catherine Abrial2, Nina Radosevic-Robin3, Xavier Durando4, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier3, Kheir-Eddine Benmammar5, Sharif Kullab5, Mohun Bahadoor5, Philippe Chollet1, Frédérique Penault-Llorca6, Jean-Marc Nabholtz3.
Abstract
Breast cancer is heterogeneous in clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical and biological features, as reflected by several different prognostic subgroups. Neoadjuvant approaches are currently used for the "in vivo" efficacy assessment of treatments. Pathological complete response (pCR) has been reported as a reliable predictive factor of survival in that setting. However, pCR remains a subject of controversy in terms of definition and its evaluation methods. In addition, its predictive value for patient outcome in various breast cancer biological subtypes has been under debate. In this review, we will present the existing definitions of pCR, the impact of its evaluation methods on its rate and the assessment of its predictive value for patient outcome in the molecular subtypes of breast cancer (luminal A and B, Triple Negative and HER2-positive).Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer sugroups; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Pathologic complete response; Surrogate marker
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25900915 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.02.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ISSN: 1040-8428 Impact factor: 6.312