Literature DB >> 25900284

Transcranial magnetic stimulation but not MRI predicts long-term clinical status in cervical spondylosis: a case series.

S N Deftereos1, E Kechagias1, C Ioakeimidou1, D Georgonikou1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Case series.
OBJECTIVE: To compare transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings between patients who underwent surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy and those with spondylosis who were not operated upon, and to correlate these findings with clinical functionality at follow-up.
SETTING: Private practice.
METHODS: Of 16 consecutive patients with cervical spondylosis 8 underwent surgery (group I) and 8 were treated conservatively (group II). We compared TMS and MRI findings between these groups and we correlated central motor conduction times (CMCTs) and MRI-measured sagittal and parasagittal diameters of the spinal canal at baseline evaluation, with clinical functionality at 2-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Group I CMCTs at the lower limbs correlated significantly with modified-JoA 2 years post surgery (r=-0.71, P<0.05), but MRI-measured diameters did not. In group II baseline TMS was unrevealing, contrary to significant spinal stenosis disclosed by MRI. The condition of none of these patients deteriorated at 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: CMCTs at the lower limbs, but not cervical spinal canal diameters, correlate with long-term functional outcome following surgical or conservative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25900284     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2014.220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  5 in total

1.  Abnormal central motor conduction at the upper but not lower limbs correlates with severe cervical spondylosis: discussion of an unexpected observation.

Authors:  Spyros N Deftereos
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2017-03-16

Review 2.  The contribution of neurophysiology in the diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review.

Authors:  R Nardone; Y Höller; F Brigo; V N Frey; P Lochner; S Leis; S Golaszewski; E Trinka
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Natural Course and the Value of Diagnostic Techniques -WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Authors:  Mehmet Zileli; Sachin A Borkar; Sumit Sinha; Rui Reinas; Óscar L Alves; Se-Hoon Kim; Sumeet Pawar; Bala Murali; Jutty Parthiban
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-09-30

4.  Developing Novel Therapies for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 7]: Opportunities From Restorative Neurobiology.

Authors:  Aref-Ali Gharooni; Brian K Kwon; Michael G Fehlings; Timothy F Boerger; Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto; Paul Aarne Koljonen; Shekar N Kurpad; James S Harrop; Bizhan Aarabi; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Jefferson R Wilson; Benjamin M Davies; Mark R N Kotter; James D Guest
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-02

5.  Imaging and Electrophysiology for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 9].

Authors:  Allan R Martin; Lindsay Tetreault; Aria Nouri; Armin Curt; Patrick Freund; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings; Brian K Kwon; James S Harrop; Benjamin M Davies; Mark R N Kotter; James D Guest; Bizhan Aarabi; Shekar N Kurpad
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-11-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.