Allan R Martin1, Lindsay Tetreault2, Aria Nouri3, Armin Curt4, Patrick Freund4, Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar5, Jefferson R Wilson6, Michael G Fehlings6, Brian K Kwon7, James S Harrop8, Benjamin M Davies9, Mark R N Kotter9, James D Guest10, Bizhan Aarabi11, Shekar N Kurpad12. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, 8789University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, 5894New York University, Langone Health, Graduate Medical Education, New York, NY, USA. 3. Division of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, 27230University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 4. University Spine Center, 31031Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, 48439Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 6. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 7. Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, Department of Orthopedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 8. Department of Neurological Surgery, 6529Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 9. Department of Neurosurgery, 2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 10. Department of Neurosurgery and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine, 12235University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. 11. Department of Neurosurgery, 1479University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA. 12. Department of Neurosurgery, 5506Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. OBJECTIVE: The current review aimed to describe the role of existing techniques and emerging methods of imaging and electrophysiology for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), a common and often progressive condition that causes spinal cord dysfunction and significant morbidity globally. METHODS: A narrative review was conducted to summarize the existing literature and highlight future directions. RESULTS: Anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well established in the literature as the key imaging tool to identify spinal cord compression, disc herniation/bulging, and inbuckling of the ligamentum flavum, thus facilitating surgical planning, while radiographs and computed tomography (CT) provide complimentary information. Electrophysiology techniques are primarily used to rule out competing diagnoses. However, signal change and measures of cord compression on conventional MRI have limited utility to characterize the degree of tissue injury, which may be helpful for diagnosis, prognostication, and repeated assessments to identify deterioration. Early translational studies of quantitative imaging and electrophysiology techniques show potential of these methods to more accurately reflect changes in spinal cord microstructure and function. CONCLUSION: Currently, clinical management of DCM relies heavily on anatomical MRI, with additional contributions from radiographs, CT, and electrophysiology. Novel quantitative assessments of microstructure, perfusion, and function have the potential to transform clinical practice, but require robust validation, automation, and standardization prior to uptake.
STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. OBJECTIVE: The current review aimed to describe the role of existing techniques and emerging methods of imaging and electrophysiology for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), a common and often progressive condition that causes spinal cord dysfunction and significant morbidity globally. METHODS: A narrative review was conducted to summarize the existing literature and highlight future directions. RESULTS: Anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well established in the literature as the key imaging tool to identify spinal cord compression, disc herniation/bulging, and inbuckling of the ligamentum flavum, thus facilitating surgical planning, while radiographs and computed tomography (CT) provide complimentary information. Electrophysiology techniques are primarily used to rule out competing diagnoses. However, signal change and measures of cord compression on conventional MRI have limited utility to characterize the degree of tissue injury, which may be helpful for diagnosis, prognostication, and repeated assessments to identify deterioration. Early translational studies of quantitative imaging and electrophysiology techniques show potential of these methods to more accurately reflect changes in spinal cord microstructure and function. CONCLUSION: Currently, clinical management of DCM relies heavily on anatomical MRI, with additional contributions from radiographs, CT, and electrophysiology. Novel quantitative assessments of microstructure, perfusion, and function have the potential to transform clinical practice, but require robust validation, automation, and standardization prior to uptake.
Authors: Monchai Ruangchainikom; Michael D Daubs; Akinobu Suzuki; Tetsuo Hayashi; Gil Weintraub; Christopher J Lee; Hirokazu Inoue; Haijun Tian; Bayan Aghdasi; Trevor P Scott; Kevin H Phan; Areesak Chotivichit; Jeffrey C Wang Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Akinobu Suzuki; Michael D Daubs; Hirokazu Inoue; Tetsuo Hayashi; Bayan Aghdasi; Scott R Montgomery; Monchai Ruangchainikom; Xueyu Hu; Christopher J Lee; Christopher J Wang; Benjamin J Wang; Hiroaki Nakamura Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jetan H Badhiwala; Christopher D Witiw; Farshad Nassiri; Muhammad A Akbar; Alireza Mansouri; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Jan Valošek; Petr Bednařík; Miloš Keřkovský; Petr Hluštík; Josef Bednařík; Alena Svatkova Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Benjamin M Davies; Alvaro Yanez Touzet; Oliver D Mowforth; Keng Siang Lee; Danyal Khan; Julio C Furlan; Michael G Fehlings; James S Harrop; Carl Moritz Zipser; Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto; James Milligan; Ellen Sarewitz; Armin Curt; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Bizhan Aarabi; Timothy F Boerger; Lindsay Tetreault; Robert Chen; James D Guest; Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Iwan Sadler; Shirley Widdop; Angus G K McNair; Brian K Kwon; Mark R N Kotter Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Khadija H Soufi; Tess M Perez; Alexis O Umoye; Jamie Yang; Maria Burgos; Allan R Martin Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-03-05 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Najmeh Kheram; Nikolai Pfender; Andrea Boraschi; Mazda Farshad; Vartan Kurtcuoglu; Armin Curt; Martin Schubert; Carl M Zipser Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-08-09 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Carl M Zipser; Michael G Fehlings; Konstantinos Margetis; Armin Curt; Michael Betz; Iwan Sadler; Lindsay Tetreault; Benjamin M Davies Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 3.241