Literature DB >> 25899978

Shear-Induced Hemolysis: Species Differences.

Jun Ding1,2, Shuqiong Niu1, Zengsheng Chen1, Tao Zhang1, Bartley P Griffith1, Zhongjun J Wu1.   

Abstract

The nonphysiological mechanical shear stress in blood-contacting medical devices is one major factor to device-induced blood damage. Animal blood is often used to test device-induced blood damage potential of these devices due to its easy accessibility and low cost. However, the differences in shear-induced blood damage between animals and human have not been well characterized. The purpose of this study was to investigate shear-induced hemolysis of human and three commonly used preclinical evaluation animal species (ovine, porcine, and bovine) under shear conditions encountered in blood-contacting medical devices. Shear-induced hemolysis experiments were conducted using two single-pass blood-shearing devices. Driven by an externally pressurized reservoir, blood single-passes through a small annular gap in the shearing devices where the blood was exposed to a uniform high shear stress. Shear-induced hemolysis at different conditions of exposure time (0.04 to 1.5 s) and shear stress (25 to 320 Pa) was quantified for ovine, porcine, bovine, and human blood, respectively. Within these ranges of shear stress and exposure time, shear-induced hemolysis was less than 2% for the four species. The results showed that the ovine blood was more susceptible to shear-induced injury than the bovine, porcine, and human blood. The response of the porcine and bovine blood to shear was similar to the human blood. The dependence of hemolysis on shear stress level and exposure time was found to fit well the power law functional form for the four species. The coefficients of the power law models for the ovine, porcine, bovine, and human blood were derived.
Copyright © 2015 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exposure time; Hemolysis; Shear stress; Species differences

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25899978     DOI: 10.1111/aor.12459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  10 in total

1.  Characterizing fretting damage in different test media for cardiovascular device durability testing.

Authors:  J D Weaver; L Ramirez; S Sivan; M Di Prima
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-04-04

2.  Relationship between Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Pressure Gradient and Hemoglobin in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Yangyi Lin; Lisha Yu; Fangfei Liu; Xiongying Lin; Hongsong Li; Xiangdong Xu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.672

3.  The Influence of Impeller Geometries on Hemolysis in Bearingless Centrifugal Pumps.

Authors:  Pascal Puentener; Marcel Schuck; Johann W Kolar
Journal:  IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol       Date:  2020-11-16

4.  Large-Eddy Simulations of Flow in the FDA Benchmark Nozzle Geometry to Predict Hemolysis.

Authors:  Nicolas Tobin; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.495

5.  Computational modeling of the Food and Drug Administration's benchmark centrifugal blood pump.

Authors:  Bryan C Good; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 3.094

6.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Induced Hemolysis: An In Vitro Study to Appraise Causative Factors.

Authors:  Chris Hoi Houng Chan; Katrina K Ki; Meili Zhang; Cooper Asnicar; Hwajin Cho; Carmen Ainola; Mahe Bouquet; Silver Heinsar; Jo Philipp Pauls; Gianluigi Li Bassi; Jacky Suen; John F Fraser
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25

7.  Haemolysis induced by mechanical circulatory support devices: unsolved problems.

Authors:  Inge Köhne
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Validation of a Miniaturized Test Loop for the Assessment of Human Blood Damage by Continuous-Flow Left-Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Eva Woelke; Ilona Mager; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Ulrich Steinseifer; Johanna C Clauser
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Computational fluid dynamics analysis and experimental hemolytic performance of three clinical centrifugal blood pumps: Revolution, Rotaflow and CentriMag.

Authors:  Dong Han; Joshua L Leibowitz; Lu Han; Shigang Wang; Ge He; Bartley P Griffith; Zhongjun J Wu
Journal:  Med Nov Technol Devices       Date:  2022-06-19

10.  Hemocompatibility and safety of the Carmat Total Artifical Heart hybrid membrane.

Authors:  Ulysse Richez; Hector De Castilla; Coralie L Guerin; Nicolas Gendron; Giulia Luraghi; Marc Grimme; Wei Wu; Myriam Taverna; Piet Jansen; Christian Latremouille; Francesco Migliavacca; Gabriele Dubini; Antoine Capel; Alain Carpentier; David M Smadja
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-12-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.