STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; ecological study. OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of wearing compression stockings to prevent muscle damage and to maintain running performance during a marathon competition. BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced muscle damage has been identified as one of the main causes of the progressive decrease in running and muscular performance found during marathon races. METHODS:Thirty-four experienced runners were pair-matched for age, anthropometric data, and best race time in the marathon, and randomly assigned to a control group (n = 17) of runners who wore conventional socks or to a group of runners who wore foot-to-kneegraduated compression stockings (n = 17). Before and after the race, a sample of venous blood was obtained, and jump height and leg muscle power were measured during a countermovement jump. Serum myoglobin and creatine kinase concentrations were determined as blood markers of muscle fiber damage. RESULTS:Total race time was not different between the control group and the compression stockings group (210 ± 23 and 214 ± 22 minutes, respectively; P = .58). Between the control group and the compression stockings group, postrace reductions in leg muscle power (-19.8% ± 17.7% versus -24.8% ± 18.4%, respectively; P = .37) and jump height (-25.3% ± 14.1% versus -32.5% . 20.4%, respectively; P = .27) were similar. At the end of the race, there were no differences between the control group and the compression stockings group in serum myoglobin (568 ± 347 ng·mL(-1) versus 573 ± 270 ng·mL(-1), respectively; P = .97) and creatine kinase concentration (390 ± 166 U·L(-1) versus 487 ± 227 U·L(-1), respectively; P = .16). CONCLUSION: The use of compression stockings did not improve running pace and did not prevent exercise-induced muscle damage during the marathon. Wearing compression stockings during long-distance running events is an ineffective strategy to avoid the deleterious effects of muscle damage on running performance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 2b.
RCT Entities:
STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; ecological study. OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of wearing compression stockings to prevent muscle damage and to maintain running performance during a marathon competition. BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced muscle damage has been identified as one of the main causes of the progressive decrease in running and muscular performance found during marathon races. METHODS: Thirty-four experienced runners were pair-matched for age, anthropometric data, and best race time in the marathon, and randomly assigned to a control group (n = 17) of runners who wore conventional socks or to a group of runners who wore foot-to-knee graduated compression stockings (n = 17). Before and after the race, a sample of venous blood was obtained, and jump height and leg muscle power were measured during a countermovement jump. Serum myoglobin and creatine kinase concentrations were determined as blood markers of muscle fiber damage. RESULTS: Total race time was not different between the control group and the compression stockings group (210 ± 23 and 214 ± 22 minutes, respectively; P = .58). Between the control group and the compression stockings group, postrace reductions in leg muscle power (-19.8% ± 17.7% versus -24.8% ± 18.4%, respectively; P = .37) and jump height (-25.3% ± 14.1% versus -32.5% . 20.4%, respectively; P = .27) were similar. At the end of the race, there were no differences between the control group and the compression stockings group in serum myoglobin (568 ± 347 ng·mL(-1) versus 573 ± 270 ng·mL(-1), respectively; P = .97) and creatine kinase concentration (390 ± 166 U·L(-1) versus 487 ± 227 U·L(-1), respectively; P = .16). CONCLUSION: The use of compression stockings did not improve running pace and did not prevent exercise-induced muscle damage during the marathon. Wearing compression stockings during long-distance running events is an ineffective strategy to avoid the deleterious effects of muscle damage on running performance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 2b.
Authors: Juan Del Coso; Marjorie Valero; Juan José Salinero; Beatriz Lara; Germán Díaz; César Gallo-Salazar; Diana Ruiz-Vicente; Francisco Areces; Carlos Puente; Juan Carlos Carril; Ramón Cacabelos Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: César Augusto da Silva; Lucas Helal; Roberto Pacheco da Silva; Karlyse Claudino Belli; Daniel Umpierre; Ricardo Stein Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Juan Del Coso; Marjorie Valero; Beatriz Lara; Juan José Salinero; César Gallo-Salazar; Francisco Areces Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hugo A Kerhervé; Pierre Samozino; Fabrice Descombe; Matthieu Pinay; Guillaume Y Millet; Marion Pasqualini; Thomas Rupp Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Juan Del Coso; Marjorie Valero; Juan José Salinero; Beatriz Lara; César Gallo-Salazar; Francisco Areces Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 3.240