Arturo Hernandez-Colina1,2, Merit Gonzalez-Olvera3,4, Emily Lomax3, Freya Townsend3, Amber Maddox3, Jenny C Hesson5, Kenneth Sherlock3, Dawn Ward6, Lindsay Eckley4, Mark Vercoe4, Javier Lopez4, Matthew Baylis3,7. 1. Department of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, Cheshire, CH64 7TE, UK. taurendil9@hotmail.com. 2. North of England Zoological Society (Chester Zoo), Caughall Road, Chester, CH2 1LH, UK. taurendil9@hotmail.com. 3. Department of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, Cheshire, CH64 7TE, UK. 4. North of England Zoological Society (Chester Zoo), Caughall Road, Chester, CH2 1LH, UK. 5. Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Zoonosis Science Centre, Uppsala University, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden. 6. Flamingo Land, Kirby Misperton, Malton, YO17 6UX, UK. 7. Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Zoological gardens contain unique configurations of exotic and endemic animals and plants that create a diverse range of developing sites and potential sources of blood meals for local mosquitoes. This may imply unusual interspecific pathogen transmission risks involving zoo vertebrates, like avian malaria to captive penguins. Understanding mosquito ecology and host feeding patterns is necessary to improve mosquito control and disease prevention measures in these environments. METHODS: Mosquito sampling took place in Chester Zoo for 3 years (2017, 2018, and 2019) and for 1 year in Flamingo Land (2017) using different trapping methods. Blood-fed mosquitoes were identified and their blood meal was amplified by PCR, sequenced, and blasted for host species identification. RESULTS: In total, 640 blood-fed mosquitoes were collected [Culex pipiens (n = 497), Culiseta annulata (n = 81), Anopheles maculipennis s.l. (n = 7), An. claviger (n = 1), and unidentifiable (n = 55)]. Successful identification of the host species was achieved from 159 blood-fed mosquitoes. Mosquitoes fed on birds (n = 74), non-human mammals (n = 20), and humans (n = 71). There were mixed blood meals from two hosts (n = 6). The proportions of blood-fed mosquitoes varied across sampling seasons and sites within the zoos. The use of resting traps and aspiration of vegetation were more efficient techniques for capturing blood-fed mosquitoes than traps for host-seeking or gravid mosquitoes. By relating the locations of zoo vertebrates to where fed mosquitoes were trapped, the minimum travelling distances were calculated (13.7 to 366.7 m). Temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, proximity to zoo vertebrate exhibits, and vegetation level were found to be significantly associated with the proportion of captured blood-fed mosquitoes by generalized linear modelling. CONCLUSIONS: Mosquito feeding behaviour in zoos is mainly influenced by time, location (sampling area), temperature, and host availability, which highlights the value of mosquito monitoring in complex settings to plan control strategies and potentially reduce inherent disease transmission risks for humans and threatened zoo vertebrates.
BACKGROUND: Zoological gardens contain unique configurations of exotic and endemic animals and plants that create a diverse range of developing sites and potential sources of blood meals for local mosquitoes. This may imply unusual interspecific pathogen transmission risks involving zoo vertebrates, like avian malaria to captive penguins. Understanding mosquito ecology and host feeding patterns is necessary to improve mosquito control and disease prevention measures in these environments. METHODS: Mosquito sampling took place in Chester Zoo for 3 years (2017, 2018, and 2019) and for 1 year in Flamingo Land (2017) using different trapping methods. Blood-fed mosquitoes were identified and their blood meal was amplified by PCR, sequenced, and blasted for host species identification. RESULTS: In total, 640 blood-fed mosquitoes were collected [Culex pipiens (n = 497), Culiseta annulata (n = 81), Anopheles maculipennis s.l. (n = 7), An. claviger (n = 1), and unidentifiable (n = 55)]. Successful identification of the host species was achieved from 159 blood-fed mosquitoes. Mosquitoes fed on birds (n = 74), non-human mammals (n = 20), and humans (n = 71). There were mixed blood meals from two hosts (n = 6). The proportions of blood-fed mosquitoes varied across sampling seasons and sites within the zoos. The use of resting traps and aspiration of vegetation were more efficient techniques for capturing blood-fed mosquitoes than traps for host-seeking or gravid mosquitoes. By relating the locations of zoo vertebrates to where fed mosquitoes were trapped, the minimum travelling distances were calculated (13.7 to 366.7 m). Temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, proximity to zoo vertebrate exhibits, and vegetation level were found to be significantly associated with the proportion of captured blood-fed mosquitoes by generalized linear modelling. CONCLUSIONS: Mosquito feeding behaviour in zoos is mainly influenced by time, location (sampling area), temperature, and host availability, which highlights the value of mosquito monitoring in complex settings to plan control strategies and potentially reduce inherent disease transmission risks for humans and threatened zoo vertebrates.
Authors: Carlos Antonio Abella-Medrano; Sergio Ibáñez-Bernal; Pilar Carbó-Ramírez; Diego Santiago-Alarcon Journal: Parasitol Int Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: James Orsborne; Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Claire L Jeffries; Mojca Kristan; Abdul Rahim Mohammed; Yaw A Afrane; Kathleen O'Reilly; Eduardo Massad; Chris Drakeley; Thomas Walker; Laith Yakob Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: V A Brugman; L M Hernández-Triana; M E England; J M Medlock; P P C Mertens; J G Logan; A J Wilson; A R Fooks; N Johnson; S Carpenter Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Heather Goodman; Andrea Egizi; Dina M Fonseca; Paul T Leisnham; Shannon L LaDeau Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Becki Lawson; Robert A Robinson; Andrew G Briscoe; Andrew A Cunningham; Anthony R Fooks; Joseph P Heaver; Luis M Hernández-Triana; Shinto K John; Nicholas Johnson; Colin Johnston; Fabian Z X Lean; Shaheed K Macgregor; Nicholas J Masters; Fiona McCracken; Lorraine M McElhinney; Jolyon M Medlock; Paul Pearce-Kelly; Katharina Seilern-Moy; Simon Spiro; Alexander G C Vaux; Arran J Folly Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-18 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Merit González-Olvera; Arturo Hernandez-Colina; Tanja Himmel; Lindsay Eckley; Javier Lopez; Julian Chantrey; Matthew Baylis; Andrew P Jackson Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 2.773
Authors: Anca I Paslaru; Lena M Maurer; Andrea Vögtlin; Bernd Hoffmann; Paul R Torgerson; Alexander Mathis; Eva Veronesi Journal: Med Vet Entomol Date: 2022-05-07 Impact factor: 2.479