INTRODUCTION: Primate and rodent models show that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPAR-α) ligands, including fibrate medications, reduce nicotine reinforcement, reward, and related effects. We tested fenofibrate, the most common U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved fibrate for lipid control versus placebo for initial evidence of efficacy in smoking cessation using a validated cross-over procedure for early Phase 2 evaluations. METHODS:Adult dependent smokers (N = 38) in this 4-week within-subjects study were those already intending to try to quit in the next 2 months. All smoked ad libitum during weeks 1 (baseline) and 3 (washout) and began fenofibrate (160 mg/d; dosing approved for lipid control) or placebo near the end of weeks 1 and 3. Following each 4-day dose run-up, they were then instructed to try to quit for 4 days (Tuesday-Friday) during weeks 2 and 4, with the order of medication conditions counter-balanced and administered double-blind. Abstinence was verified daily in each 4-day quit period by self-report of no smoking in the prior 24 hours and carbon monoxide < 5 ppm. Secondary measures of acute smoking reinforcement and cue reactivity prior to quitting, and smoking reduction when trying to quit, were also assessed. RESULTS: No differences between fenofibrate versus placebo were found on days quit (means ± SEM of 1.8±0.3 vs. 1.9±0.3, respectively). Similarly, there were no differences in any of the secondary measures (all P > .20). CONCLUSIONS: Although higher dosing or other proliferator-activated receptor-alpha agonists may show efficacy, this study indicates that fenofibrate does not aid ability to stop smoking during a brief practice quit period in dependent smokers high in current quit interest.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Primate and rodent models show that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPAR-α) ligands, including fibrate medications, reduce nicotine reinforcement, reward, and related effects. We tested fenofibrate, the most common U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved fibrate for lipid control versus placebo for initial evidence of efficacy in smoking cessation using a validated cross-over procedure for early Phase 2 evaluations. METHODS: Adult dependent smokers (N = 38) in this 4-week within-subjects study were those already intending to try to quit in the next 2 months. All smoked ad libitum during weeks 1 (baseline) and 3 (washout) and began fenofibrate (160 mg/d; dosing approved for lipid control) or placebo near the end of weeks 1 and 3. Following each 4-day dose run-up, they were then instructed to try to quit for 4 days (Tuesday-Friday) during weeks 2 and 4, with the order of medication conditions counter-balanced and administered double-blind. Abstinence was verified daily in each 4-day quit period by self-report of no smoking in the prior 24 hours and carbon monoxide < 5 ppm. Secondary measures of acute smoking reinforcement and cue reactivity prior to quitting, and smoking reduction when trying to quit, were also assessed. RESULTS: No differences between fenofibrate versus placebo were found on days quit (means ± SEM of 1.8±0.3 vs. 1.9±0.3, respectively). Similarly, there were no differences in any of the secondary measures (all P > .20). CONCLUSIONS: Although higher dosing or other proliferator-activated receptor-alpha agonists may show efficacy, this study indicates that fenofibrate does not aid ability to stop smoking during a brief practice quit period in dependent smokers high in current quit interest.
Authors: Kenneth A Perkins; Caryn Lerman; Joshua L Karelitz; Nancy C Jao; K N Roy Chengappa; Garrett M Sparks Journal: Addiction Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Robert A Schnoll; E Paul Wileyto; Angela Pinto; Frank Leone; Peter Gariti; Steven Siegel; Kenneth A Perkins; Charles Dackis; Daniel F Heitjan; Wade Berrettini; Caryn Lerman Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2008-06-09 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Bernard Le Foll; Patricia Di Ciano; Leigh V Panlilio; Steven R Goldberg; Roberto Ciccocioppo Journal: Curr Drug Targets Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.465
Authors: Kenneth A Perkins; K N Roy Chengappa; Joshua L Karelitz; Margaret C Boldry; Valerie Michael; Taylor Herb; Jessica Gannon; Jaspreet Brar; Lisa Ford; Stefanie Rassnick; Darlene H Brunzell Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Asti Jackson; Deniz Bagdas; Pretal P Muldoon; Aron H Lichtman; F Ivy Carroll; Mark Greenwald; Michael F Miles; M Imad Damaj Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Giulia Donvito; Fabiana Piscitelli; Pretal Muldoon; Asti Jackson; Rosa Maria Vitale; Enrico D'Aniello; Catia Giordano; Bogna M Ignatowska-Jankowska; Mohammed A Mustafa; Francesca Guida; Gavin N Petrie; Linda Parker; Reem Smoum; Laura Sim-Selley; Sabatino Maione; Aron H Lichtman; M Imad Damaj; Vincenzo Di Marzo; Raphael Mechoulam Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Zollie A Yavarow; Hye-Ri Kang; Lauren R Waskowicz; Boon-Huat Bay; Sarah P Young; Paul M Yen; Dwight D Koeberl Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Marie N S Gendy; Patricia Di Ciano; William J Kowalczyk; Sean P Barrett; Tony P George; Stephen Heishman; Bernard Le Foll Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 3.240