| Literature DB >> 25895500 |
Li Ma1, Sami Piirainen2, Natalia Kulesskaya3, Heikki Rauvala4, Li Tian5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social deficit is one of the core symptoms of neuropsychiatric diseases, in which immune genes play an important role. Although a few immune genes have been shown to regulate social and emotional behaviors, how immune gene network(s) may jointly regulate sociability has not been investigated so far.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25895500 PMCID: PMC4404243 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-015-0297-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Figure 1Protein-protein interaction network analysis of differentially expressed innate immune genes among inbred mouse strains with STRINGv9.1. Five major clusters were identified from the 23 immune genes (marked by squares) discovered through microarray analysis of brain genes in 8 inbred mouse strains. Confidence of an interaction is represented by the thickness of the line.
Differential expression analysis of selected brain immune genes across eight inbred mouse strains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 8.41 | 8.64 |
| 9.00 |
| 8.51 | 8.77 | 8.43 | 1.56E − 09 |
|
|
| 10.91 | 9.96 | 11.12 |
| 10.96 | 11.00 | 11.11 | 2.59E − 09 |
|
| 9.91 | 10.66 |
| 10.08 | 10.97 | 10.43 |
| 9.68 | 2.40E − 12 |
|
| 9.76 | 8.64 | 9.71 |
|
| 10.32 | 10.24 | 9.96 | 5.20E − 24 |
|
| 6.53 | 6.17 |
| 5.94 |
| 6.40 | 6.09 | 6.09 | 5.42E − 08 |
|
| 7.41 |
| 7.38 |
| 7.49 | 7.56 | 7.65 | 7.39 | 4.35E − 09 |
Microarray data of the eight inbred male mice brains were retrieved and analyzed for differential expression in Phenogen Informatics. One-way-ANOVA was used as the statistical method. P values were further corrected by the Benjamini and Hochberg method for multiple test post hoc correction with FDR = 1E − 7. Mean expression levels are presented, and the highest and lowest levels for each gene are bold and italicized, respectively.
Meta-analysis of geno-phenotype correlation
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| −0.95 (0.01) | |||
|
| −0.97 (0.006) | CC_0.89 (0.003) | ||
|
| −0.92 (0.0249) | |||
|
| 0.91 | −0.95 | ||
| (0.035) | (0.014) | |||
|
| 0.91 | 0.82 | ||
| (0.032) | (0.013) | |||
|
| CC_ − 0.85 (0.008) | |||
Phenotypic correlation of some immune genes with male mice behaviors and brain morphology was analyzed in mouse phenome database (MPD) with the Pearson’s method. MPD registry number for each study used in the analysis is listed. Pearson’s r values for the most significant correlations are summarized. P values are in parentheses in the table. Evaluation criteria used are the following: anxiety, entries into closed arm of elevated plus maze; exploratory-locomotor activity, entries into the center of elevated plus maze and distance traveled in open field; fear conditioning, time spent (%) near chamber walls in a contextual/cued fear-conditioning chamber; brain morphology, corpus callosum (CC) length.
Figure 2DBA/2 J mice show impaired social behavior. The percentages of social time spent by the DBA/2 J and C57BL/6 J mice in (A) resident-intruder test and (B) three-chambered test are shown (n = 8 per strain). **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Data were analyzed by Student’s t test. Results are presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 3Differential expression of immune genes H2-d1 (A), C1qb (B), Tnfsf13b (C), and Polr3b (D) in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), hippocampus (HC), and hypothalamus (Hypo) between DBA/2 J and C57BL/6 J strains by RT-qPCR. Relative expression level was first normalized against Gapdh and then set as fold change against the expression level in the hypothalamus of the C57BL/6 J mice for each gene (n = 8 per strain). Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test. *P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. Results are presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 4Correlation of C1qb expression with social behavior in the C57BL/6 J and DBA/2 J mice. Correlations of the mRNA levels of C1qb in the HC with the percentages of social time in the three-chambered test in DBA/2 J ((A) r = 0.7193, P < 0.05) and C57BL/6 J ((B) r = 0.0227, P > 0.05) were analyzed by the Pearson’s method.