Literature DB >> 25895481

Accuracy of CO₂ monitoring via nasal cannulas and oral bite blocks during sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Kuo-Chen Chang1, Joe Orr2, Wei-Chih Hsu1, Lu Yu3, Mei-Yung Tsou1,4, Dwayne R Westenskow2, Chien-Kun Ting5,6.   

Abstract

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedures are typically performed under conscious sedation. Drug-induced respiratory depression is a major cause of serious adverse effects during sedation. Capnographic monitoring of respiratory activity improves patient safety during procedural sedation. This bench study compares the performance of the nasal cannulas and oral bite blocks used to monitor exhaled CO2 during sedation. We used a spontaneously breathing mechanical lung to evaluated four CO2 sampling nasal cannulas and three CO2 sampling bite blocks. We placed pneumatic resistors in the mouth of the manikin to simulate different levels of mouth opening. We compared CO2 measurements taken from the sampling device to CO2 measurements taken directly from the trachea. The end tidal CO2 concentration (PETCO2) measured through the bite blocks and nasal cannulas was always lower than the corresponding PETCO2 measured at the trachea. The difference became larger as the amount of oxygen delivered through the devices increased. The difference was larger during normal ventilation than during hypoventilation. The difference became larger as the amount of oral breathing increased. The two nasal cannulas without oral cups failed to provide sufficient CO2 for breath detection when the mouth was fully open and oxygen was delivered at 10 L/min. Our simulation found that respiratory rate can be accurately monitored during the procedure using a CO2 sampling bite block or a nasal cannula with oral cup. The accuracy of PETCO2 measurements depends on the device used, the amount of supplement oxygen, the amount of oral breathing and the patient's minute ventilation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conscious sedation; End-tidal carbon dioxide; Esophagogastroduodenoscopy; Manikin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25895481     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9696-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  19 in total

1.  Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Moderate sedation for elective upper endoscopy with balanced propofol versus fentanyl and midazolam alone: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  B E Levitzky; R Lopez; J A Dumot; J J Vargo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 3.  Capnography in the gastroenterology lab.

Authors:  Sarah Eisenbacher; Lisa Heard
Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.978

4.  The effect of nasal oxygen flow and catheter position on the accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide measurements by a pharyngeal catheter in unintubated, spontaneously breathing subjects.

Authors:  B Oberg; T Waldau; V H Larsen
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Lawrence B Cohen; Julie S Wecsler; John N Gaetano; Ariel A Benson; Kenneth M Miller; Valerie Durkalski; James Aisenberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Microstream capnography improves patient monitoring during moderate sedation: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jenifer R Lightdale; Donald A Goldmann; Henry A Feldman; Adrienne R Newburg; James A DiNardo; Victor L Fox
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Supplemental oxygen impairs detection of hypoventilation by pulse oximetry.

Authors:  Eugene S Fu; John B Downs; John W Schweiger; Rafael V Miguel; Robert A Smith
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Combined pulse oximetry/cutaneous carbon dioxide tension monitoring during colonoscopies: pilot study with a smart ear clip.

Authors:  Ludwig T Heuss; Prashant N Chhajed; Patricia Schnieper; Thomas Hirt; Christoph Beglinger
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Capnographic monitoring of respiratory activity improves safety of sedation for endoscopic cholangiopancreatography and ultrasonography.

Authors:  Mohammed A Qadeer; John J Vargo; John A Dumot; Rocio Lopez; Patricia A Trolli; Tyler Stevens; Mansour A Parsi; Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Gregory Zuccaro
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Viju P Deenadayalu; Emely Eid; Thomas F Imperiale; John A Walker; Kuldip Sandhu; Anthony C Clarke; Lybus C Hillman; Akira Horiuchi; Lawrence B Cohen; Ludwig T Heuss; Shajan Peter; Christoph Beglinger; James A Sinnott; Thomas Welton; Magdy Rofail; Iyad Subei; Rodger Sleven; Paul Jordan; John Goff; Patrick D Gerstenberger; Harold Munnings; Martin Tagle; Brian W Sipe; Till Wehrmann; Jack A Di Palma; Kaitlin E Occhipinti; Egidio Barbi; Andrea Riphaus; Stephen T Amann; Gen Tohda; Timothy McClellan; Charles Thueson; John Morse; Nizam Meah
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: respiration.

Authors:  D S Karbing; S E Rees; M B Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Oral capnography is more effective than nasal capnography during sedative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Wei-Nung Teng; Chien-Kun Ting; Yu-Tzu Wang; Ming-Chih Hou; Mei-Yung Tsou; Huihua Chiang; Chun-Li Lin
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Evaluation and application of a method for estimating nasal end-tidal O2 fraction while administering supplemental O2.

Authors:  Kyle M Burk; Kai Kuck; Joseph A Orr
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2018-2019 end of year summary: respiration.

Authors:  D S Karbing; G Perchiazzi; S E Rees; M B Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.502

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.