PURPOSE: To elucidate what kinds of lesions tend to be overlooked or misinterpreted and why they were overlooked or misinterpreted on chest radiographs in the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) by comparing radiographic findings with HRCT findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 129 patients with CAP (107 bacterial and 22 atypical) and 105 healthy subjects, the chest radiographic findings were correlated with the HRCT findings. The diagnostic accuracy of each chest radiographic finding was evaluated by comparing it with the HRCT finding. RESULTS: The false negative rate of radiographic interpretation tended to be higher for nodules and thickening of the bronchial wall, especially in patients with atypical pneumonia. The most frequent reason for false negative interpretations of nodules and bronchial wall thickening was the overlapping of these findings with airspace consolidation or ground-glass opacity (GGO). Thin lesions were the most frequent reasons for the false negative interpretation of airspace consolidation and GGO. CONCLUSION: The chest radiographic interpretations of GGO and airspace consolidation were influenced by the thickness of lesions, and those of nodules and thickening of bronchial walls were influenced by coexisting GGO and airspace consolidation and may contribute to a misinterpretation of these lesions and an incorrect diagnosis of CAP.
PURPOSE: To elucidate what kinds of lesions tend to be overlooked or misinterpreted and why they were overlooked or misinterpreted on chest radiographs in the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) by comparing radiographic findings with HRCT findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 129 patients with CAP (107 bacterial and 22 atypical) and 105 healthy subjects, the chest radiographic findings were correlated with the HRCT findings. The diagnostic accuracy of each chest radiographic finding was evaluated by comparing it with the HRCT finding. RESULTS: The false negative rate of radiographic interpretation tended to be higher for nodules and thickening of the bronchial wall, especially in patients with atypical pneumonia. The most frequent reason for false negative interpretations of nodules and bronchial wall thickening was the overlapping of these findings with airspace consolidation or ground-glass opacity (GGO). Thin lesions were the most frequent reasons for the false negative interpretation of airspace consolidation and GGO. CONCLUSION: The chest radiographic interpretations of GGO and airspace consolidation were influenced by the thickness of lesions, and those of nodules and thickening of bronchial walls were influenced by coexisting GGO and airspace consolidation and may contribute to a misinterpretation of these lesions and an incorrect diagnosis of CAP.
Authors: David M Hansell; Alexander A Bankier; Heber MacMahon; Theresa C McLoud; Nestor L Müller; Jacques Remy Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Eun A Kim; Kyung Soo Lee; Steven L Primack; Hye Kyung Yoon; Hong Sik Byun; Tae Sung Kim; Gee Young Suh; O Jung Kwon; Joungho Han Journal: Radiographics Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: N Tanaka; T Matsumoto; T Kuramitsu; H Nakaki; K Ito; H Uchisako; G Miura; N Matsunaga; K Yamakawa Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 1996 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826