| Literature DB >> 25894340 |
Shaogui Wan1, Yousheng Wu2, Xingchun Zhou2, Yibing Chen2, Jiaze An3, Xiaohe Yu4, Huiqing Zhang5, Hushan Yang6, Jinliang Xing2.
Abstract
Alterations of activity and expression in tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle key enzymes have been indicated in several malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). They play an important role in the progression of cancer. However, the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes encoding these key enzymes on the recurrence of HCC has not been investigated. In this study, we genotyped 17 SNPs in genes encoding TCA cycle key enzymes and analyzed their association with recurrence-free survival (RFS) in a cohort of 492 Chinese HCC patients by Cox proportional hazard model and survival tree analysis. We identified 7 SNPs in SDHC, SDHD, FH, and IDH2 genes to be significantly associated with the RFS of HCC patients. Moreover, all these SNPs were associated with the early recurrence (within 2 years after surgery) risk of diseases. Cumulative effect analysis showed that these SNPs exhibited a dose-dependent effect on the overall and early recurrence. Further stratified analysis suggested that number of risk genotypes modified the protective effect on HCC recurrence conferred by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment. Finally, the survival tree analysis revealed that SNP rs10789859 in SDHD gene was the primary factor contributing to HCC recurrence in our population. To the best of our knowledge, we for the first time observed the association between SNPs in genes encoding TCA cycle key enzymes and HCC recurrence risk. Further observational and functional studies are needed to validate our findings and generalize its clinical usage.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25894340 PMCID: PMC4404327 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics distribution of study population by recurrence.
| Variables | No recurrence (%), n = 197 | Recurrence (%), n = 295 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD) | 53.5 (10.7) | 51.7 (10.7) | 0.064 |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 33 (16.8) | 34 (11.5) | |
| Male | 164 (83.2) | 261 (88.5) | 0.098 |
| HBsAg | |||
| Negative | 19 (9.6) | 27 (9.2) | |
| Positive | 178 (90.4) | 268 (90.8) | 0.854 |
| Serum AFP (ng/ml) | |||
| < 200 | 126 (64.0) | 138 (46.8) | |
| ≥ 200 | 71 (36.0) | 157 (53.2) | 1.8 × 10-4 |
| Tumor size (cm) | |||
| < 5 | 103 (52.3) | 106 (35.9) | |
| ≥ 5 | 94 (47.7) | 189 (64.1) | 3.2 × 10-4 |
| Tumor number | |||
| Single | 176 (89.3) | 220 (74.6) | |
| Multiple | 21 (10.7) | 75 (25.4) | 5.1 × 10-5 |
| Tumor differentiation | |||
| Well and moderate | 82 (41.6) | 65 (22.0) | |
| Poor | 115 (48.4) | 230 (78.0) | 3.3 × 10-6 |
| TNM stage | |||
| Stage I + II | 179 (90.9) | 215 (72.9) | |
| Stage III + IV | 18 (9.1) | 80 (27.1) | 9.9 × 10-7 |
| BCLC stage | |||
| A | 172 (87.3) | 190 (64.4) | |
| B | 15 (7.6) | 47 (15.9) | |
| C | 10 (5.1) | 58 (19.7) | 6.5 × 10-8 |
| PVTT status | |||
| Negative | 192 (97.5) | 247 (83.7) | |
| Positive | 5 (2.5) | 48 (16.3) | 1.5 × 10-6 |
| First-line treatment | |||
| Surgery only | 114 (57.9) | 193 (65.4) | |
| Surgery + TACE | 83 (42.1) | 102 (34.6) | 0.090 |
*P values were compared by chi-square test for categorical variables and Student’s t test for continuous variable.
Abbreviations: AFP, α-fetal protein; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; HBsAg, hepatitis B virus surface antigen; SD, standard deviation; PVTT, portal vein tumor thrombus; TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
Association of polymorphisms in TCA cycle genes with recurrence in HCC patients.
| Genesymbol | SNP | Overall recurrence | Early recurrence | Late recurrence | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best fitting model | HR (95%CI) |
| q value | Best fitting model | HR (95%CI) |
| q value | Best fitting model | HR (95%CI) |
| q value | ||
|
| rs13173911 | REC | 0.79 (0.45–1.40) | 0.424 | 0.551 | REC | 0.86 (0.49–1.51) | 0.590 | 0.669 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| rs2864963 | REC | 0.70 (0.46–1.06) | 0.089 | 0.189 | REC | 0.73 (0.48–1.12) | 0.154 | 0.291 | REC | 0.80 (0.33–1.91) | 0.614 | 0.878 | |
|
| rs3754509 | REC | 1.11 (0.81–1.53) | 0.515 | 0.584 | REC | 1.20 (0.87–1.65) | 0.266 | 0.411 | REC | 1.09 (0.46–2.57) | 0.853 | 0.910 |
|
| rs12064957 | REC |
|
| 0.119 | REC |
|
| 0.065 | ADD | 0.65 (0.22–1.95) | 0.438 | 0.878 |
| rs4131826 | ADD | 0.92 (0.77–1.12) | 0.416 | 0.551 | ADD | 0.94 (0.77–1.14) | 0.502 | 0.656 | REC | 0.67 (0.26–1.72) | 0.409 | 0.878 | |
| rs3935401 | ADD |
|
| 0.119 | ADD |
|
| 0.100 | REC | 1.04 (0.42–2.61) | 0.928 | 0.928 | |
|
| rs544184 | DOM |
|
|
| DOM |
|
|
| REC | 1.18 (0.49–2.82) | 0.710 | 0.878 |
| rs7121782 | DOM |
|
|
| DOM |
|
|
| REC | 1.18 (0.49–2.82) | 0.709 | 0.878 | |
| rs10789859 | DOM |
|
|
| DOM |
|
|
| REC | 1.14 (0.48–2.72) | 0.768 | 0.878 | |
|
| rs12071124 | DOM | 0.91 (0.70–1.17) | 0.454 | 0.551 | DOM | 0.92 (0.70–1.21) | 0.547 | 0.664 | REC | 0.75 (0.30–1.89) | 0.548 | 0.878 |
| rs7530270 | DOM | 0.90 (0.69–1.16) | 0.403 | 0.551 | DOM | 0.91 (0.69–1.19) | 0.470 | 0.656 | REC | 0.81 (0.32–2.05) | 0.655 | 0.878 | |
| rs1414493 | DOM |
|
| 0.102 | DOM |
|
| 0.100 | DOM | 0.64 (0.27–1.56) | 0.329 | 0.878 | |
|
| rs12478635 | DOM | 0.87 (0.67–1.11) | 0.263 | 0.447 | DOM | 0.84 (0.65–1.09) | 0.198 | 0.337 | REC | 1.78 (0.59–5.42) | 0.307 | 0.878 |
|
| rs11540478 | REC |
|
|
| REC |
|
|
| REC | 1.17 (0.47–2.92) | 0.733 | 0.878 |
| rs4283211 | DOM | 0.94 (0.74–1.19) | 0.604 | 0.604 | REC | 1.12 (0.71–1.77) | 0.635 | 0.675 | REC | 0.44 (0.18–1.10) | 0.078 | 0.878 | |
| rs11632348 | DOM | 0.93 (0.74–1.18) | 0.557 | 0.592 | REC | 1.06 (0.67–1.67) | 0.819 | 0.819 | REC | 0.51 (0.20–1.26) | 0.143 | 0.878 | |
| rs4932158 | REC | 0.64 (0.36–1.12) | 0.118 | 0.223 | REC | 0.61 (0.34–1.09) | 0.097 | 0.206 | REC | 0.83 (0.29–2.36) | 0.730 | 0.878 | |
*HR was adjusted for age, gender, HBsAg status, serum AFP level, TNM stage, tumor differentiation and treatment.
Abbreviations: ADD, additive model; DOM, dominant model; REC, recessive model; TFBS, transcription factor binding site.
Significant P values (< 0.05) were bolded. And q values were calculated by multiple comparison q tests.
Fig 1Cumulative effects of risk genotypes.
A) Overall recurrence free survival; B) Early recurrence free survival. Cumulative effects of risk genotypes groups were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves (left panels) and estimated using Cox proportional hazards model by multivariate analysis (right panels). Individual SNPs with significant P values <0.05 were included to categorize the risk genotype groups.
Fig 2Modified effects of TACE treatment on HCC recurrence stratified by the number of risk genotypes.
A) In all patients; B) In patients with less than 2 risk genotypes; C) In patients with equal to or more than 2 risk genotypes.
Fig 3Potential higher order gene—gene interactions among TCA pathway polymorphisms.
A) Tree structure identifying subgroups of patients with different genetic backgrounds; B) Kaplan—Meier survival curves for patients based on survival tree analysis.