OBJECTIVES: Lesion detection in acute stroke by computed-tomography perfusion (CTP) can be affected by incomplete bolus coverage in veins and hypoperfused tissue, so-called bolus truncation (BT), and low contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). We examined the BT-frequency and hypothesized that image down-sampling and a vascular model (VM) for perfusion calculation would improve normo- and hypoperfused tissue classification. METHODS: CTP datasets from 40 acute stroke patients were retrospectively analysed for BT. In 16 patients with hypoperfused tissue but no BT, repeated 2-by-2 image down-sampling and uniform filtering was performed, comparing CNR to perfusion-MRI levels and tissue classification to that of unprocessed data. By simulating reduced scan duration, the minimum scan-duration at which estimated lesion volumes came within 10% of their true volume was compared for VM and state-of-the-art algorithms. RESULTS: BT in veins and hypoperfused tissue was observed in 9/40 (22.5%) and 17/40 patients (42.5%), respectively. Down-sampling to 128 × 128 resolution yielded CNR comparable to MR data and improved tissue classification (p = 0.0069). VM reduced minimum scan duration, providing reliable maps of cerebral blood flow and mean transit time: 5 s (p = 0.03) and 7 s (p < 0.0001), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: BT is not uncommon in stroke CTP with 40-s scan duration. Applying image down-sampling and VM improve tissue classification. KEY POINTS: • Too-short imaging duration is common in clinical acute stroke CTP imaging. • The consequence is impaired identification of hypoperfused tissue in acute stroke patients. • The vascular model is less sensitive than current algorithms to imaging duration. • Noise reduction by image down-sampling improves identification of hypoperfused tissue by CTP.
OBJECTIVES: Lesion detection in acute stroke by computed-tomography perfusion (CTP) can be affected by incomplete bolus coverage in veins and hypoperfused tissue, so-called bolus truncation (BT), and low contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). We examined the BT-frequency and hypothesized that image down-sampling and a vascular model (VM) for perfusion calculation would improve normo- and hypoperfused tissue classification. METHODS: CTP datasets from 40 acute stroke patients were retrospectively analysed for BT. In 16 patients with hypoperfused tissue but no BT, repeated 2-by-2 image down-sampling and uniform filtering was performed, comparing CNR to perfusion-MRI levels and tissue classification to that of unprocessed data. By simulating reduced scan duration, the minimum scan-duration at which estimated lesion volumes came within 10% of their true volume was compared for VM and state-of-the-art algorithms. RESULTS: BT in veins and hypoperfused tissue was observed in 9/40 (22.5%) and 17/40 patients (42.5%), respectively. Down-sampling to 128 × 128 resolution yielded CNR comparable to MR data and improved tissue classification (p = 0.0069). VM reduced minimum scan duration, providing reliable maps of cerebral blood flow and mean transit time: 5 s (p = 0.03) and 7 s (p < 0.0001), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: BT is not uncommon in stroke CTP with 40-s scan duration. Applying image down-sampling and VM improve tissue classification. KEY POINTS: • Too-short imaging duration is common in clinical acute stroke CTP imaging. • The consequence is impaired identification of hypoperfused tissue in acute stroke patients. • The vascular model is less sensitive than current algorithms to imaging duration. • Noise reduction by image down-sampling improves identification of hypoperfused tissue by CTP.
Authors: Kim Mouridsen; Karl Friston; Niels Hjort; Louise Gyldensted; Leif Østergaard; Stefan Kiebel Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-09-12 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: K S Butcher; M Parsons; L MacGregor; P A Barber; J Chalk; C Bladin; C Levi; T Kimber; D Schultz; J Fink; B Tress; G Donnan; S Davis Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Nils Wahlgren; Niaz Ahmed; Antoni Dávalos; Gary A Ford; Martin Grond; Werner Hacke; Michael G Hennerici; Markku Kaste; Sonja Kuelkens; Vincent Larrue; Kennedy R Lees; Risto O Roine; Lauri Soinne; Danilo Toni; Geert Vanhooren Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-01-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: H J Wittsack; A M Wohlschläger; E K Ritzl; R Kleiser; M Cohnen; R J Seitz; U Mödder Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Søren Christensen; Christopher R Levi; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis; Mark W Parsons Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: B D Murphy; A J Fox; D H Lee; D J Sahlas; S E Black; M J Hogan; S B Coutts; A M Demchuk; M Goyal; R I Aviv; S Symons; I B Gulka; V Beletsky; D Pelz; V Hachinski; R Chan; T-Y Lee Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-06-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Max Wintermark; Wade S Smith; Nerissa U Ko; Marcel Quist; Pierre Schnyder; William P Dillon Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 3.825