| Literature DB >> 25892932 |
Abstract
AIMS: To determine the feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of intravitreal 0.7-mg dexamethasone implants (Ozurdex) in patients with refractory cystoid macular edema after uncomplicated cataract surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this study, 11 eyes of 11 patients affected by pseudophakic cystoid macular edema refractory to medical treatment were treated with a single intravitreal injection of a dexamethasone implant. Follow-up visits involved Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity testing, optical coherence tomography imaging, and ophthalmoscopic examination.Entities:
Keywords: Cataract surgery; Intravitreal dexamethasone implant; Ozurdex; Refractory pseudophakic cystoid macular edema
Year: 2014 PMID: 25892932 PMCID: PMC4398816 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2014.10.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Ophthalmol ISSN: 1319-4534
Baseline demographics and clinical features of the patients.
| Patient No. | Gender | Age (Years) | Duration of CME Before Ozurdex Treatment (Months) | BCVA (logMAR) | Foveal thickness (μm) | Intraocular pressure (mmHg) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Month 1 | Month 3 | Month 6 | Baseline | Month 1 | Month 3 | Month 6 | Baseline | Month 1 | Month 3 | Month 6 | ||||
| 1 | M | 55 | 8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 319 | 281 | 277 | 265 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 2 | F | 53 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 566 | 351 | 288 | 293 | 12 | 11 | 15 | 15 |
| 3 | M | 70 | 6 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 720 | 542 | 411 | 423 | 18 | 16 | 18 | 17 |
| 4 | M | 47 | 7 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 445 | 330 | 283 | 294 | 12 | 13 | 15 | 13 |
| 5 | F | 73 | 6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 610 | 451 | 314 | 321 | 19 | 18 | 19 | 19 |
| 6 | M | 57 | 10 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 532 | 335 | 255 | 263 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 17 |
| 7 | M | 61 | 9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 405 | 311 | 290 | 297 | 17 | 17 | 20 | 18 |
| 8 | F | 59 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 420 | 332 | 280 | 280 | 17 | 15 | 19 | 16 |
| 9 | M | 61 | 7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 435 | 308 | 293 | 300 | 13 | 13 | 15 | 14 |
| 10 | M | 58 | 6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 705 | 512 | 375 | 390 | 19 | 20 | 18 | 18 |
| 11 | F | 62 | 9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 590 | 420 | 299 | 315 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 18 |
Figure 1Mean changes from baseline foveal thickness. Improvement in foveal thickness observed at 1, 3, and 6 months after the injection.
Figure 2Mean changes from baseline BCVA. Improvement in BCVA observed at 1, 3, and 6 months after the injection.
Figure 3Final foveal thickness is positively correlated with baseline BCVA (r = 0.57, p = 0.002).