Literature DB >> 25892885

Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for focal hepatic lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

You-Wei Li1, Zheng-Guang Chen1, Ji-Chen Wang1, Zong-Ming Zhang1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the performance of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions (FHLs).
METHODS: This meta-analysis compared relevant studies that were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for articles published between January 1988 and September 2014 and that met the following criteria: (1) SPIO-enhanced MRI was conducted to identify FHLs and data were sufficient for pooled analysis using Meta-DiSc 1.4; (2) hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) were differentiated from other FHLs; (3) well-differentiated HCCs (WD-HCCs) were contradistinguished from dysplastic nodules; and (4) WD-HCCs were compared with moderately and poorly differentiated HCCs (MD- and PD-HCCs, respectively).
RESULTS: The data obtained from 15 eligible studies yielded a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 78% for differentiating between HCCs and other FHLs. The sensitivity was unchanged and the specificity was increased to 87% when non-HCC malignancies were excluded. Comparative analyses between WD-HCCs and MD- and PD-HCCs from seven studies showed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 50% for the diagnosis of MD- and PD-HCCs, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) curve was 0.97. A comparison between WD-HCCs and dysplastic nodules revealed a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 92% for the diagnosis of WD-HCCs and the area under the sROC curve was 0.80.
CONCLUSION: SPIO-enhanced MRI is useful in differentiating between HCCs and other FHLs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinomas; Magnetic resonance imaging; Meta-analysis; Other lesions; USPIO

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25892885      PMCID: PMC4394096          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i14.4334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  24 in total

1.  Differential diagnosis of hepatic nodules using delayed parenchymal phase imaging of levovist contrast ultrasound: comparative study with SPIO-MRI.

Authors:  Shiro Suzuki; Hiroko Iijima; Fuminori Moriyasu; Shunichi Sasaki; Kyosuke Yanagisawa; Takeo Miyahara; Kazutake Oguma; Masahiro Yoshida; Toshiya Horibe; Naoki Ito; Dai Kakizaki; Kimihiko Abe; Kaoru Tsuchiya
Journal:  Hepatol Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.288

2.  Characterization of hyperintense nodules on T1-weighted liver magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of Ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI with accumulation-phase FS-T1WI and gadolinium-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Chen-Te Chou; Ran-Chou Chen; Wei-Tsung Chen; Jiunn-Ming Lii
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 2.743

3.  Comparison of enhancement patterns of histologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma between gadoxetate- and ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Masahiro Okada; Yasuharu Imai; Tonsok Kim; Sachiyo Kogita; Manabu Takamura; Seishi Kumano; Hiromitsu Onishi; Masatoshi Hori; Kazuto Fukuda; Norio Hayashi; Kenichi Wakasa; Michiie Sakamoto; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  MR characterisation of dysplastic nodules and hepatocarcinoma in the cirrhotic liver with hepatospecific superparamagnetic contrast agents: pathological correlation in explanted livers.

Authors:  L Macarini; P Milillo; A Cascavilla; G Scalzo; L Stoppino; R Vinci; G Moretti; G Ettorre
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  [Correlation between SPIO-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histological grading in hepatocellular carcinoma].

Authors:  Xue-Hui Zhang; Bi-Ling Liang; Sui-Qiao Huang
Journal:  Ai Zheng       Date:  2003-07

Review 6.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: current management and recent advances.

Authors:  Wan-Yee Lau; Eric C H Lai
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2008-06

7.  Imaging of benign hypervascular hepatocellular nodules in alcoholic liver cirrhosis: differentiation from hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Satoshi Kobayashi; Osamu Matsui; Takeshi Kamura; Satoshi Yamamoto; Norihide Yoneda; Toshifumi Gabata; Noboru Terayama; Junichiro Sanada
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging to identify and characterize focal liver lesions: comparison between gadolinium and superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast media.

Authors:  Simone Maurea; Pier Paolo Mainenti; Annamaria Tambasco; Massimo Imbriaco; Carmine Mollica; Ettore Laccetti; Luigi Camera; Raffaele Liuzzi; Marco Salvatore
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-06

9.  Ferumoxide-enhanced MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histologic tumor grade and tumor vascularity.

Authors:  Hiroki Kato; Masayuki Kanematsu; Hiroshi Kondo; Satoshi Goshima; Masayuki Matsuo; Hiroaki Hoshi; Noriyuki Moriyama
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Differential diagnosis of nodular lesions in cirrhotic liver by post-vascular phase contrast-enhanced US with Levovist: comparison with superparamagnetic iron oxide magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Tatsuo Inoue; Masatoshi Kudo; Ryousuke Watai; Zhou Pei; Toshihiko Kawasaki; Yasunori Minami; Hobyung Chung; Toyokazu Fukunaga; Kazuo Awai; Osamu Maenishi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.772

View more
  8 in total

1.  Current status of superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents for liver magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yi-Xiang J Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Clinically Approved Nanoparticle Imaging Agents.

Authors:  Avnesh S Thakor; Jesse V Jokerst; Pejman Ghanouni; Jos L Campbell; Erik Mittra; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Safety margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide.

Authors:  Kuniaki Fukuda; Kensaku Mori; Naoyuki Hasegawa; Katsuhiro Nasu; Kazunori Ishige; Yoshikazu Okamoto; Masanari Shiigai; Masato Abei; Manabu Minami; Ichinosuke Hyodo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Tin Nadarevic; Agostino Colli; Vanja Giljaca; Mirella Fraquelli; Giovanni Casazza; Cristina Manzotti; Davor Štimac; Damir Miletic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-06

5.  How to Provide Gadolinium-Free PET/MR Cancer Staging of Children and Young Adults in Less than 1 h: the Stanford Approach.

Authors:  Anne M Muehe; Ashok J Theruvath; Lillian Lai; Maryam Aghighi; Andrew Quon; Samantha J Holdsworth; Jia Wang; Sandra Luna-Fineman; Neyssa Marina; Ranjana Advani; Jarrett Rosenberg; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  In vitro toxicity of FemOn, FemOn-SiO2 composite, and SiO2-FemOn core-shell magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yana G Toropova; Alexey S Golovkin; Anna B Malashicheva; Dmitry V Korolev; Andrey N Gorshkov; Kamil G Gareev; Michael V Afonin; Michael M Galagudza
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-01-13

Review 7.  Diagnostic accuracy of midkine for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Juan Tang; Xiao Zhou; Shao-Liang Zhu; Le-Qun Li
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.183

8.  Diagnostic Value of the Combination of Golgi Protein 73 and Alpha-Fetoprotein in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Meiyu Dai; Xiaoli Chen; Xuexiang Liu; Zheng Peng; Jie Meng; Shengming Dai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.