Literature DB >> 15163434

Differential diagnosis of hepatic nodules using delayed parenchymal phase imaging of levovist contrast ultrasound: comparative study with SPIO-MRI.

Shiro Suzuki1, Hiroko Iijima, Fuminori Moriyasu, Shunichi Sasaki, Kyosuke Yanagisawa, Takeo Miyahara, Kazutake Oguma, Masahiro Yoshida, Toshiya Horibe, Naoki Ito, Dai Kakizaki, Kimihiko Abe, Kaoru Tsuchiya.   

Abstract

T2-weighted fast spin echo images and T2*-weighted gradient-echo images of superparamagnetic iron oxide magnetic resonance imaging (SPIO-MRI) have been reported to reflect the number and function of macrophages in reticuloendothelial organs and be useful to differentiate malignant tumors from benign nodules of liver. We tried to prove that contrast-enhanced ultrasound can diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by comparing the findings of SPIO-MRI and the findings of the liver parenchyma on the delayed parenchymal phase of ultrasound imaging using the intravenous contrast agent Levovist, not through the evaluation of vascular imaging. Forty-six patients (52 nodules) with histopathological diagnosis of hepatic tumors were studied. They consisted of 11 non-malignant nodules (six regenerative nodules and five dysplastic nodules) and 41 HCC. All the patients were examined by Levovist contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and SPIO-MRI. The delayed liver parenchymal images of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the intravenous contrast agent Levovist were similar to those observed on SPIO-MRI. The similarity of both findings suggests that delayed phase imaging by Levovist is closely related to the number and function of Kupffer cells in liver tumors. The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for HCC was high (90.4%) demonstrating that it is as reliable as SPIO-MRI.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 15163434     DOI: 10.1016/j.hepres.2004.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatol Res        ISSN: 1386-6346            Impact factor:   4.288


  10 in total

1.  Decreased accumulation of ultrasound contrast in the liver of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis rat model.

Authors:  Yuki Miyata; Takeo Miyahara; Fuminori Moriyasu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Contrast-enhanced and targeted ultrasound.

Authors:  Michiel Postema; Odd Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Diagnosis value of focal liver lesions with SonoVue®-enhanced ultrasound compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Guang; LiMei Xie; Hailong Ding; AiLu Cai; Ying Huang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced US for characterization of focal liver lesions: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Menglin Wu; Liang Li; Jiahui Wang; Yanyan Zhang; Qi Guo; Xue Li; Xuening Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for focal hepatic lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  You-Wei Li; Zheng-Guang Chen; Ji-Chen Wang; Zong-Ming Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Diagnosis of liver cirrhosis with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Guang-Jian Liu; Ming-De Lu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-28

Review 7.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Mirella Fraquelli; Tin Nadarevic; Agostino Colli; Cristina Manzotti; Vanja Giljaca; Damir Miletic; Davor Štimac; Giovanni Casazza
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-02

8.  Differential diagnosis of nodular lesions in cirrhotic liver by post-vascular phase contrast-enhanced US with Levovist: comparison with superparamagnetic iron oxide magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Tatsuo Inoue; Masatoshi Kudo; Ryousuke Watai; Zhou Pei; Toshihiko Kawasaki; Yasunori Minami; Hobyung Chung; Toyokazu Fukunaga; Kazuo Awai; Osamu Maenishi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.772

9.  Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis with evidence from 1998 to 2016.

Authors:  Juanjuan Zhang; Yanyan Yu; Ying Li; Lunshou Wei
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-07

Review 10.  Current role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hironori Tanaka
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 1.314

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.