INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The value of socioeconomic status as a prognostic marker in acute myocardial infarction is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of educational level, as a marker of socioeconomic status, on the prognosis of long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study of 5797 patients admitted to hospital with acute myocardial infarction. We studied long-term all-cause mortality (median 8.5 years) using adjusted regression models. RESULTS: We found that 73.1% of patients had primary school education (n=4240), 14.5% had secondary school education (including high school) (n=843), 7.0% was illiterate (n=407), and 5.3% had higher education (n=307). Patients with secondary school or higher education were significantly younger, more were male, and they had fewer risk factors and comorbidity. These patients arrived sooner at hospital and had less severe heart failure. During admission they received more reperfusion therapy and their crude mortality was lower. Their drug treatment in hospital and at discharge followed guideline recommendations more closely. On multivariate analysis, secondary school or higher education was an independent predictor and protective factor for long-term mortality (hazard ratio=0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows an inverse and independent relationship between educational level and long-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The value of socioeconomic status as a prognostic marker in acute myocardial infarction is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of educational level, as a marker of socioeconomic status, on the prognosis of long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study of 5797 patients admitted to hospital with acute myocardial infarction. We studied long-term all-cause mortality (median 8.5 years) using adjusted regression models. RESULTS: We found that 73.1% of patients had primary school education (n=4240), 14.5% had secondary school education (including high school) (n=843), 7.0% was illiterate (n=407), and 5.3% had higher education (n=307). Patients with secondary school or higher education were significantly younger, more were male, and they had fewer risk factors and comorbidity. These patients arrived sooner at hospital and had less severe heart failure. During admission they received more reperfusion therapy and their crude mortality was lower. Their drug treatment in hospital and at discharge followed guideline recommendations more closely. On multivariate analysis, secondary school or higher education was an independent predictor and protective factor for long-term mortality (hazard ratio=0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows an inverse and independent relationship between educational level and long-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Keywords:
Educational level; Infarto de miocardio; Myocardial infarction; Nivel de estudios; Nivel socioeconómico; Prognosis; Pronóstico; Socioeconomic status
Authors: Sterffeson Lamare Lucena de Abreu; Joana D'Arc Matos França de Abreu; Maria Dos Remédios Freitas Carvalho Branco; Alcione Miranda Dos Santos Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Joaquim Barreto; Jose Carlos Quinaglia E Silva; Andrei C Sposito; Luiz Sergio Carvalho Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 2.000