Literature DB >> 25891678

Assessment of volume reduction effect after lung lobectomy for cancer.

Kazuhiro Ueda1, Junichi Murakami2, Fumiho Sano2, Masataro Hayashi2, Taiga Kobayashi3, Yoshie Kunihiro3, Kimikazu Hamano2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung lobectomy results in an unexpected improvement of the remaining lung function in some patients with moderate-to-severe emphysema. Because the lung function is the main limiting factor for therapeutic decision making in patients with lung cancer, it may be advantageous to identify patients who may benefit from the volume reduction effect, particularly those with a poor functional reserve.
METHODS: We measured the regional distribution of the emphysematous lung and normal lung using quantitative computed tomography in 84 patients undergoing lung lobectomy for cancer between January 2010 and December 2012. The volume reduction effect was diagnosed using a combination of radiologic and spirometric parameters.
RESULTS: Eight patients (10%) were favorably affected by the volume reduction effect. The forced expiratory volume in one second increased postoperatively in these eight patients, whereas the forced vital capacity was unchanged, thus resulting in an improvement of the airflow obstruction postoperatively. This improvement was not due to a compensatory expansion of the remaining lung but was associated with a relative decrease in the forced end-expiratory lung volume. According to a multivariate analysis, airflow obstruction and the forced end-expiratory lung volume were independent predictors of the volume reduction effect.
CONCLUSIONS: A combined assessment using spirometry and quantitative computed tomography helped to characterize the respiratory dynamics underlying the volume reduction effect, thus leading to the identification of novel predictors of a volume reduction effect after lobectomy for cancer. Verification of our results by a large-scale prospective study may help to extend the indications for lobectomy in patients with oncologically resectable lung cancer who have a marginal pulmonary function.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Lobectomy; Lung cancer; Pulmonary function; Volume reduction effect

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25891678     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.03.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  10 in total

1.  The lobar vs. sublobar "limited" resection respiratory function preservation debate: learning to speak the same language.

Authors:  Vasileios Kouritas; Richard Milton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

2.  Prolonged air leaks after vats lobectomy: do we need another risk score?

Authors:  Angelo Carretta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Impact of age on the recovery of six-minute walking distance after lung cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Saito; Atsushi Shiraishi; Hiroaki Nomori; Hiroki Matsui; Kazuki Yoshida; Yuya Matsue; Tomoko Fujii; Kennosuke Kawama
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-09-04

Review 4.  CT Radiomics in Thoracic Oncology: Technique and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Geewon Lee; So Hyeon Bak; Ho Yun Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-12-18

5.  Regional Emphysema Score Predicting Overall Survival, Quality of Life, and Pulmonary Function Recovery in Early-Stage Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jie Dai; Ming Liu; Stephen J Swensen; Shawn M Stoddard; Jason A Wampfler; Andrew H Limper; Gening Jiang; Ping Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Postoperative pulmonary function changes according to the resected lobe: a 1-year follow-up study of lobectomized patients.

Authors:  Masanori Yokoba; Tsuyoshi Ichikawa; Shinya Harada; Masahito Naito; Yukitoshi Sato; Masato Katagiri
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Preoperative risk assessment with computed tomography in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Ueda; Junichi Murakami; Toshiki Tanaka; Masataro Hayashi; Kazunori Okabe; Kimikazu Hamano
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: From a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Jie Dai; Ping Yang; Angela Cox; Gening Jiang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-14

9.  Predicting Postoperative Lung Function Following Lung Cancer Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicola K Oswald; James Halle-Smith; Rana Mehdi; Peter Nightingale; Babu Naidu; Alice M Turner
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-09-10

10.  Comparison between quantitative computed tomography, scintigraphy, and anatomical methods for prediction of postoperative FEV1 and DLCO: effects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status and resected lobes.

Authors:  Masanori Yokoba; Tsuyoshi Ichikawa; Shinya Harada; Kazu Shiomi; Masashi Mikubo; Mototsugu Ono; Dai Sonoda; Yukitoshi Satoh; Hironori Hanawa; Katsuhiko Naoki; Masato Katagiri
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.005

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.