Literature DB >> 25891497

Cervical lateral mass screw-rod fixation: Surgical experience with 2500 consecutive screws, an analytical review, and long-term outcomes.

Mohammed M Al Barbarawi1, Mohammed Z Allouh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Posterior lateral mass screw-rod fixation is a common procedure in patients who undergo multilevel cervical spine laminectomy. It has been widely used in the last decade due to its ease of application and better biomechanical stability when compared with other techniques. However, the main risk remains the possibility of violating the spinal nerve root, vertebral artery, and/or facet joint.
PURPOSE: This study reviews the short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent posterior cervical screw-rod stabilisation using the Anderson-Sekhon technique. It investigates the safety and reliability of this technique in one of the largest reported case series.
METHODS: Both clinical and radiological indicators were retrospectively assessed in lateral mass fixation patients who were treated with the Anderson-Sekhon technique for screw insertion and trajectory. The sample included 430 patients with different cervical spine disorders who were treated with a total of 2500 lateral mass polyaxial screws from December 2005 until January 2014. Follow-up period ranged from 4 months to 8 years. No neural or vascular injury occurred. Twelve patients had wound infection, of whom 6 had deep infection. Twenty patients had C5 radicular pain that subsided over time; 2 required C5 screw modification; and another 3 required screw repositioning at different levels. Two patients had asymptomatic screw pull-out evident only on radiographs and required no treatment. Iatrogenic dural tear occurred in 12 patients with severe spondylosis, while CSF leakage from the tear was observed in 3 patients. Symptomatic adjacent segment disease was noted in 4 patients within the follow-up period and was treated with surveillance.
CONCLUSION: Lateral mass screw-rod stabilisation using the Anderson-Sekhon technique can be applied safely and effectively for various cervical spine diseases, resulting in a low complication rate and favourable short- and long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anderson–Sekhon technique; arthrodesis; decompressive laminectomy; polyaxial screw; spinal instrumentation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25891497     DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1026798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Spinal navigation for posterior cervical and cervicothoracic instrumentation].

Authors:  M Richter; D Ploux
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 2.  [Relevance of spinal navigation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine].

Authors:  R Kothe; M Richter
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Lateral mass screw fixation in cervical spine injury.

Authors:  Lal Rehman; Iram Bukhari; Ali Afzal; Raza Rizvi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Perioperative complications in patients treated with posterior cervical fusion and bilateral cages.

Authors:  Krzysztof B Siemionow; Pawel Glowka; Robert J Blok; Mark C Gillespy; Mukund I Gundanna; William D Smith; Zeshan Hyder; Bruce M McCormack
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

5.  Free hand technique of cervical lateral mass screw fixation.

Authors:  Mohamed Mohi Eldin; Ahmed Salah Aldin Hassan
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 6.  Burden of Surgical Site Infections Associated with Select Spine Operations and Involvement of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Harshila Patel; Hanane Khoury; Douglas Girgenti; Sharon Welner; Holly Yu
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  Misplaced Cervical Screws Requiring Reoperation.

Authors:  Jeremy C Peterson; Paul M Arnold; Zachary A Smith; Wellington K Hsu; Michael G Fehlings; Robert A Hart; Alan S Hilibrand; Ahmad Nassr; Ra'Kerry K Rahman; Chadi A Tannoury; Tony Tannoury; Thomas E Mroz; Bradford L Currier; Anthony F De Giacomo; Jeremy L Fogelson; Bruce C Jobse; Eric M Massicotte; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-01

8.  Limited laminectomy and foraminal decompression combined with internal fixation for treating multi-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Does it effectively improve neurological function and prevent C5 palsy?

Authors:  Yue-Jiang Zhao; Cai Cheng; Han-Wen Chen; Min Li; Lu Wang; Zhi-Yuan Guo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Efficacy of Posterior Cervical Laminectomy and Decompression plus Lateral Mass Screw-Rod Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Multisegment Cervical Spinal Canal Stenosis and Effects on Cervical Curvature and Range of Motion Parameters.

Authors:  Bo Liu; Yufei Wang; Yaning Zhang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 10.  Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion With Interfacet Cages: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Joseph L Laratta; Karishma Gupta; William D Smith
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-03-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.