Literature DB >> 25891377

Geographic variation of endoscopic sinus surgery in the United States.

Luke Rudmik1, Chantal E Holy2, Timothy L Smith3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to examine the rates and geographic variation of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in a representative sample of the US working population. STUDY
DESIGN: Observational cohort study using the MarketScan Commercial Claim and Encounters database.
METHODS: All patients who received ESS between 2009 and 2013 were included. The annual adjusted rates of ESS per 1,000 people were calculated for each US state. Geographic variations were evaluated using the extremal quotient (EQ), weighted coefficient of variation (CV), systematic component of variance (SCV), and empirical Bayes statistic. The χ(2) statistic tests was used to quantify variation of the adjusted ESS rates across states within the US.
RESULTS: The annual adjusted rate of ESS was 0.94 per 1,000 people in the US. South Dakota and Alabama were observed to have the highest rates of ESS, 1.80 and 1.69, respectively. Vermont and Arkansas were observed to have the lowest rates of ESS, 0.51 and 0.57, respectively. The mean EQ was 4.54, indicating a four- to fivefold difference between the highest (South Dakota) and lowest (Vermont) states. The mean CV was 31.4 and mean SCV was 10.1, which demonstrates very high variation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study observed very high geographic variation in the rates of ESS across the United States. Given that practice variation indicates the presence of potentially harmful and inefficient unwarranted care, outcomes from this study indicate a need to further evaluate the delivery of ESS to improve overall health system performance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.
© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic sinus surgery; appropriateness; chronic rhinosinusitis; geographic variation; practice variation; quality of care; sinusitis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25891377     DOI: 10.1002/lary.25314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  8 in total

1.  Long-term revision rates for endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Kristine A Smith; Richard R Orlandi; Gretchen Oakley; Huong Meeks; Karen Curtin; Jeremiah A Alt
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.858

Review 2.  Sino-Nasal outcome test-22 outcomes after sinus surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zachary M Soler; Rabun Jones; Phong Le; Luke Rudmik; Jose L Mattos; Shaun A Nguyen; Rodney J Schlosser
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Evaluating Surgeon-Specific Performance for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Authors:  Luke Rudmik; Yuan Xu; Jeremiah A Alt; Adam Deconde; Timothy L Smith; Rodney J Schlosser; Hude Quan; Zachary M Soler
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  How often is sinus surgery performed for chronic rhinosinusitis with versus without nasal polyps?

Authors:  Elisabeth H Ference; Jeffrey D Suh; Bruce K Tan; Stephanie Shintani Smith
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.467

5.  THE 2017 13TH ANNUAL DAVID W. KENNEDY, MD, LECTURE The evolution of outcomes in sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.858

6.  Development and validation of an administrative data algorithm to identify adults who have endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Kristian I Macdonald; Shaun J Kilty; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-05-08

7.  Regional differences in endoscopic sinus surgery in Finland: a nationwide register-based study.

Authors:  Sanna Toppila-Salmi; Heikki Rihkanen; Martti Arffman; Kristiina Manderbacka; Ilmo Keskimaki; Maija L Hytönen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Healthcare utilisation, follow-up of guidelines and practice variation on rhinosinusitis in adults: A healthcare reimbursement claims study in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Nina M Kaper; Mark C J Aarts; Robert J Stokroos; Geert J M G van der Heijden
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.729

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.