Shanliang Zhong1, Xiaohui Zhang1, Lin Chen2, Tengfei Ma1, Jinhai Tang3, Jianhua Zhao4. 1. Center of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China. 2. Departments of Oncology, Xuzhou Medical College, Xuzhou 221004, China. 3. Department of General Surgery, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China. 4. Center of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China. Electronic address: seuzsl@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined the effect of statin use on the mortality in cancer patients, but the results are inconsistent. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the association with all available studies. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed and EMBASE to April 2015. We calculated the summary hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. We estimated combined HRs associated with defined increments of statin use, using random-effects meta-analysis and dose-response meta-regression models. RESULTS: Thirty-nine cohort studies and two case-control studies involving 990,649 participants were included. The results showed that patients who used statins after diagnosis had a HR of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72-0.91) for all-cause mortality compared to non-users. Those who used statin after diagnosis (vs. non-users) had a HR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66-0.88) for cancer-specific mortality. Prediagnostic exposure to statin was associated with both all-cause mortality (HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.74-0.85) and cancer-specific mortality (HR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.79). Stratifying by cancer type, the three largest cancer-type subgroups were colorectal, prostate and breast cancer and all showed a benefit from statin use. HRs per 365 defined daily doses increment were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69-0.92) for all-cause mortality and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.67-0.89) for cancer-specific mortality. A 1year increment in duration only conferred a borderline decreased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the average effect of statin use, both postdiagnosis and prediagnosis, is beneficial for overall survival and cancer-specific survival.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined the effect of statin use on the mortality in cancerpatients, but the results are inconsistent. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the association with all available studies. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed and EMBASE to April 2015. We calculated the summary hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. We estimated combined HRs associated with defined increments of statin use, using random-effects meta-analysis and dose-response meta-regression models. RESULTS: Thirty-nine cohort studies and two case-control studies involving 990,649 participants were included. The results showed that patients who used statins after diagnosis had a HR of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72-0.91) for all-cause mortality compared to non-users. Those who used statin after diagnosis (vs. non-users) had a HR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66-0.88) for cancer-specific mortality. Prediagnostic exposure to statin was associated with both all-cause mortality (HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.74-0.85) and cancer-specific mortality (HR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.79). Stratifying by cancer type, the three largest cancer-type subgroups were colorectal, prostate and breast cancer and all showed a benefit from statin use. HRs per 365 defined daily doses increment were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69-0.92) for all-cause mortality and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.67-0.89) for cancer-specific mortality. A 1year increment in duration only conferred a borderline decreased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the average effect of statin use, both postdiagnosis and prediagnosis, is beneficial for overall survival and cancer-specific survival.
Authors: Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Candyce H Kroenke; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Carla M Prado; Patrick T Bradshaw; Andrew J Dannenberg; Marilyn L Kwan; Jingjie Xiao; Charles Quesenberry; Erin K Weltzien; Adrienne L Castillo; Bette J Caan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ange Wang; Heather A Wakelee; Aaron K Aragaki; Jean Y Tang; Allison W Kurian; JoAnn E Manson; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 5.113