Literature DB >> 25890753

Macrophage silica nanoparticle response is phenotypically dependent.

Heather L Herd1, Kristopher T Bartlett1, Joshua A Gustafson2, Lawrence D McGill3, Hamidreza Ghandehari4.   

Abstract

Phagocytes are important players in host exposure to nanomaterials. Macrophages in particular are believed to be among the "first responders" and primary cell types that uptake and process nanoparticles, mediating host biological responses by subsequent interactions with inflammatory signaling pathways and immune cells. However, variations in local microenvironmental cues can significantly change the functional and phenotype of these cells, impacting nanoparticle uptake and overall physiological response. Herein we focus on describing the response of specific RAW 264.7 macrophage phenotypes (M1, INF-gamma/LPS induced and M2, IL-4 induced) to Stöber silica nanoparticle exposure in vitro and how this response might correlate with macrophage response to nanoparticles in vivo. It was observed that variations in macrophage phenotype produce significant differences in macrophage morphology, silica nanoparticle uptake and toxicity. High uptake was observed in M1, versus low uptake in M2 cells. M2 cells also displayed more susceptibility to concentration dependent proliferative effects, suggesting potential M1 involvement in in vivo uptake. Nanoparticles accumulated within liver and spleen tissues, with high association with macrophages within these tissues and an overall Th1 response in vivo. Both in vitro and in vivo studies are consistent in demonstrating that silica nanoparticles exhibit high macrophage sequestration, particularly those with Th1/M1 phenotype and in clearance organs. This sequestration and phenotypic response should be a primary consideration when designing new Stöber silica nanoparticle systems, as it might affect the overall efficacy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug delivery; Macrophage; Nanoparticles; Silica

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25890753      PMCID: PMC4405667          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  38 in total

Review 1.  Nanomedicine(s) under the microscope.

Authors:  Ruth Duncan; Rogerio Gaspar
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Macrophage polarization comes of age.

Authors:  Alberto Mantovani; Antonio Sica; Massimo Locati
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 31.745

3.  Interactions of antigen-loaded polylactide particles with macrophages and their correlation with the immune response.

Authors:  Vibhu Kanchan; Amulya K Panda
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Biodegradable nanoparticle delivery of a Th2-biased peptide for induction of Th1 immune responses.

Authors:  M E Christine Lutsiak; Glen S Kwon; John Samuel
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.765

5.  Variability of biological effects of silicas: different degrees of activation of the fifth component of complement by amorphous silicas.

Authors:  Mario Governa; Monica Amati; Ivana Fenoglio; Matteo Valentino; Sabrina Coloccini; Lucia Bolognini; Gian Carlo Botta; Monica Emanuelli; Francesca Pierella; Anna Rita Volpe; Paola Astolfi; Marco Carmignani; Bice Fubini
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Innate defence functions of macrophages can be biased by nano-sized ceramic and metallic particles.

Authors:  Marilena Lucarelli; Antonietta M Gatti; Graziana Savarino; Paola Quattroni; Lucia Martinelli; Emanuela Monari; Diana Boraschi
Journal:  Eur Cytokine Netw       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.737

7.  Macrophage activation: classical versus alternative.

Authors:  Andrea Classen; Jorge Lloberas; Antonio Celada
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

Review 8.  Silica binding and toxicity in alveolar macrophages.

Authors:  Raymond F Hamilton; Sheetal A Thakur; Andrij Holian
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 9.  LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway.

Authors:  Yong-Chen Lu; Wen-Chen Yeh; Pamela S Ohashi
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.861

Review 10.  Macrophage polarization in health and disease.

Authors:  Luca Cassetta; Edana Cassol; Guido Poli
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2011-12-05
View more
  19 in total

1.  TIPS pentacene loaded PEO-PDLLA core-shell nanoparticles have similar cellular uptake dynamics in M1 and M2 macrophages and in corresponding in vivo microenvironments.

Authors:  Dylan K McDaniel; Ami Jo; Veronica M Ringel-Scaia; Sheryl Coutermarsh-Ott; Daniel E Rothschild; Michael D Powell; Rui Zhang; Timothy E Long; Kenneth J Oestreich; Judy S Riffle; Richey M Davis; Irving C Allen
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 2.  Progress in tumor-associated macrophage (TAM)-targeted therapeutics.

Authors:  Chayanon Ngambenjawong; Heather H Gustafson; Suzie H Pun
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  A far-red fluorescent probe for flow cytometry and image-based functional studies of xenobiotic sequestering macrophages.

Authors:  Rahul K Keswani; Gi S Yoon; Sudha Sud; Kathleen A Stringer; Gus R Rosania
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Combined Action of Human Commensal Bacteria and Amorphous Silica Nanoparticles on the Viability and Immune Responses of Dendritic Cells.

Authors:  Giulia Malachin; Elisa Lubian; Fabrizio Mancin; Emanuele Papini; Regina Tavano
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2017-10-05

5.  Subchronic toxicity of silica nanoparticles as a function of size and porosity.

Authors:  Raziye Mohammadpour; Mostafa Yazdimamaghani; Darwin L Cheney; Jolanta Jedrzkiewicz; Hamidreza Ghandehari
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 6.  A toxicological profile of silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  James Y Liu; Christie M Sayes
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 2.680

7.  Nanoparticle Uptake: The Phagocyte Problem.

Authors:  Heather Herd Gustafson; Dolly Holt-Casper; David W Grainger; Hamidreza Ghandehari
Journal:  Nano Today       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 20.722

8.  Cell-cell contact with proinflammatory macrophages enhances the immunotherapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cells in two abortion models.

Authors:  Yanhong Li; Di Zhang; Ling Xu; Lin Dong; Ji Zheng; Yikong Lin; Jiefang Huang; Yanyun Zhang; Yu Tao; Xingxing Zang; Dajin Li; Meirong Du
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 11.530

Review 9.  Why the Immune System Should Be Concerned by Nanomaterials?

Authors:  Marc J Pallardy; Isabelle Turbica; Armelle Biola-Vidamment
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Comparative Evaluation of U.S. Brand and Generic Intravenous Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose Injection: In Vitro Cellular Uptake.

Authors:  Min Wu; Dajun Sun; Katherine Tyner; Wenlei Jiang; Rodney Rouse
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.