| Literature DB >> 25890324 |
Hamisi M Malebo1, Victor Wiketye2, Shaaban J Katani3, Nteghenjwa A Kitufe4, Vitus A Nyigo5, Calister P Imeda6, John W Ogondiek7, Richard Sunguruma8, Paulo P Mhame9, Julius J Massaga10, Bertha Mammuya11, Kesheni P Senkoro12, Susan F Rumisha13, Mwelecele N Malecela14, Andrew Y Kitua15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Tanzania and elsewhere, medicinal plants, including Maytenus senegalensis, are still widely used in the treatment of malaria and other ailments. The aim of the present study was to investigate the in vivo antiplasmodial and toxic effects in mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25890324 PMCID: PMC4446455 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-014-0525-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Percent Parasitaemia per dose in mg/kg body weight of mouse
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 25 | 6.25 | 6.75 | 6.50 | 6.80 | 6.20 |
| P < 0.001 |
| 50 | 3.66 | 3.69 | 3.43 | 3.80 | 3.40 |
| P < 0.001 |
| 75 | 2.06 | 2.10 | 1.54 | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| P < 0.001 |
| 100 | 0.90 | 0.96 | 1.16 | 1.08 | 0.90 |
| P < 0.001 |
| Neg. control | 56.58 | 56.45 | 56.57 | 56.56 | 56.51 |
| |
| SP (25/1.25) | 0.49 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.65 |
| |
Figure 1Suppression of parasitaemia exhibited by different dosages of in comparison to controls in experimentally infected mice.
Figure 2Percent parasitaemia observed with different dosages of in comparison to controls in experimentally infected mice.
The calculated percentage of suppression (inhibition) of per dose
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 100 - [6.5/56.53 × 100] |
| P < 0.05 |
| 50 | 100 - [3.59/56.53 × 100] |
| P < 0.05 |
| 75 | 100 - [1.9/56.53 × 100] |
| P > 0.05* |
| 100 | 100 - [1.1/56.53 × 100] |
| P > 0.05* |
| Negative control | 100 - [56.53/56.53 × 100] |
| |
| Positive control (SP) (25/1.25 | 100 - [0.52/56.53 × 100] |
|
*SP (standard drug) has no marked superiority to M. senegalensis extract at a dose of 75-100 mg/kg.
Figure 3Suppression of parasitaemia exhibited by different dosages of in comparison to controls in experimentally infected mice.
Probit analysis of antiplasmodial activity of ethanol extract in experimental mice
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ED50 | 3.3 | 1.8 to 4.9 |
| ED75 | 10.2 | 7.2 to 13.5 |
| ED90 | 28.4 | 21.6 to 39.3 |
| ED99 | 166.5 | 102.4 to 349.8 |
Slope = 1.361 + −0.162; Natural Response. = 0.000 + −0.000; Heterogeneity = 0.04.
acute toxicity of ethanol extract in experimental mice
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| 200 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 300 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 400 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 800 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 1600 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Toxicity effect manifestation of ethanol extract in experimental mice
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1. Alertness | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 2. Grooming | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
| 3. Tremors | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
| 4. Convulsion | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
| 5. Urination | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 6. Salivation | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 7. Writhing | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
Key: N = normal; A = absent.