| Literature DB >> 25890107 |
Vahe Khachadourian1, Haroutune K Armenian2, Anahit Demirchyan3, Armen Goenjian4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the existing evidence of a long lasting effect of disaster related experiences on physical and psychological health, few studies have evaluated long-term quality of life (QOL) outcomes of disaster survivors and the factors associated with such outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25890107 PMCID: PMC4336679 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-015-0209-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes ISSN: 1477-7525 Impact factor: 3.186
Descriptive statistics of quality of life outcome and other variables of interest among the cohort of the 1988 Armenian earthquake survivors
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Age in 2012a, mean (SD) | 58.95 (12.07) | 63.08 (15.83) |
| Female gendera, % | 67.9% | 50.3% |
| Length of education (year)a, mean (SD) | 12.18 (2.42) | 11.37 (3.22) |
| Earthquake related material loss | ||
| none to minimum loss, % | 60.6% | 57.4% |
| moderate loss, % | 22.9% | 24.0% |
| severe loss, % | 16.6% | 18.5% |
| Post-earthquake financial/material aid, % | 35.2% | 36.0% |
| Earthquake related death in the family, % | 9.5% | 9.0% |
| Earthquake related injury, % | 8.7% | 7.9% |
| PTSD in 1991b, % | 49.0% | 50.0% |
| Depression in 1991b, % | 51.5% | 51.7% |
| PTSD in 2012b, % | 13.0% | - |
| Depression in 2012b, % | 26.4% | - |
| Anxiety in 2012b, % | 28.9% | - |
| Alcohol abuse in 2012, % | 4.3% | - |
| Current smoker in 2012, % | 18.5% | - |
| Social support score in 2012c, mean (SD) | 17.90 (3.77) | - |
| Number of physical illnesses in 2012d, mean (SD) | 2.80 (1.97) | - |
| Quality of life score (health index), mean (SD) | 0.68 (0.25) | - |
aSignificant difference (p-value <0.05).
bBinary variable created using a cut-off level.
cSocial support score range was 0–28.
dNumber of physical illnesses range was 0–15.
SD: standard deviation.
Bivariate linear regression analysis of quality of life scores (health index) of the 1988 Spitak earthquake survivors
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Age (years) | −0.007 | <0.001 |
| Female gender | −0.054 | 0.007 |
| Length of education (years) | 0.019 | <0.001 |
| Socio-economic status in 2012a | 0.016 | <0.001 |
| Earthquake related material lossb | −0.013 | 0.016 |
| Post-earthquake financial/material aid | −0.026 | 0.183 |
| Post-earthquake financial/material aid to those with severe material loss | 0.077 | 0.065 |
| Social support scorec | 0.025 | <0.001 |
| Earthquake related death in the family | −0.014 | 0.662 |
| Earthquake related injury | −0.016 | 0.642 |
| Number of life time stressful events | −0.024 | <0.001 |
| Number of physical illnesses in 2012d | −0.056 | <0.001 |
| PTSD in 1991e | −0.026 | 0.163 |
| Depression in1991e | −0.019 | 0.315 |
| PTSD in 2012e | −0.233 | <0.001 |
| Depression in 2012e | −0.258 | <0.001 |
| Anxiety in 2012e | −0.208 | <0.001 |
| Alcohol abuse in 2012 | 0.052 | <0.001 |
| Current smoker in 2012 | 0.068 | 0.005 |
aSocioeconomic status: 0 = low, 1 = average, 2 = high.
bEarthquake related material loss was reported in phase I (1990–1992). Material loss variable was divided into three levels: none to minimum loss = 0, moderate loss = 1, and severe loss = 2.
cSocial support score range was 0–28.
dNumber of physical illnesses range was 0–15.
eHaving a score equal/above the selected cut-off level.
Multivariate linear regression model of quality of life scores (health index) of the 1988 Spitak earthquake survivors
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age (years) | −0.005 | −0.006 | −0.004 | <0.001 |
| Gender | −0.019 | −0.062 | 0.004 | 0.387 |
| Male = 0 | ||||
| Female = 1 | ||||
| Length of education (years) | 0.004 | −0.002 | 0.010 | 0.165 |
| Socio-economic status in 2012 | 0.013 | −0.006 | 0.032 | 0.186 |
| low = 0 | ||||
| average = 1 | ||||
| high = 2 | ||||
| Earthquake related material loss | −0.038 | −0.063 | −0.014 | 0.002 |
| none to minimum = 0 | ||||
| moderate = 1 | ||||
| Severe = 2 | ||||
| Post-earthquake financial/material aid | −0.023 | −0.055 | 0.010 | 0.175 |
| no = 0 | ||||
| yes = 1 | ||||
| Post-earthquake financial/material aid to those with severe material loss | 0.075 | 0.009 | 0.141 | 0.025 |
| no = 0 | ||||
| yes = 1 | ||||
| Social support score (0–28) | 0.009 | 0.004 | 0.013 | <0.001 |
| Number of physical illnesses in 2012 (0–15) | −0.033 | −0.041 | −0.025 | <0.001 |
| PTSD in1991 | 0.010 | −0.020 | 0.040 | 0.513 |
| no = 0 | ||||
| yes = 1 | ||||
| PTSD in 2012 | −0.072 | −0.109 | −0.036 | 0.002 |
| no = 0 | ||||
| yes = 1 | ||||
| Depression in 2012 | −0.108 | −0.147 | −0.069 | <0.001 |
| no = 0 | ||||
| yes = 1 | ||||
| Anxiety in 2012 | −0.072 | −0.109 | −0.036 | <0.001 |
| no = 0 | ||||
| yes = 1 | ||||
| Alcohol abuse in 2012 | 0.049 | −0.024 | 0.121 | 0.189 |
| no = 0 | ||||
| yes = 1 | ||||
| Smoking in 2012 | 0.000 | −0.051 | 0.052 | 0.992 |
| no = 0 | ||||
| yes = 1 | ||||
Ordinal logistic regression model on determinants of difficulties reported on each of five subscales (domains) of quality of life among 1988 Spitak earthquake survivors
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age in 2012 (years) | 1.07* | 1.08* | 1.05* | 1.03* | 1.01 |
| Earthquake related material loss | |||||
| None to minimum | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Moderate | 1.57* | 1.67* | 1.53* | 1.09 | 1.62* |
| Severe | 1.86* | 2.85* | 1.49 | 1.69¶ | 2.69* |
| Post-earthquake. financial/material aid | 1.19 | 1.46 | 1.21 | 1.09 | 1.07 |
| Post-earthquake. financial/material aid among those with severe material loss | 0.67 | 0.21* | 0.40* | 0.86 | 0.44* |
| Social support score | 0.91* | 0.94* | 0.91* | 0.96* | 0.93* |
| Number of physical illnesses | 1.30* | 1.25* | 1.26* | 1.38* | 1.24* |
| PTSD in 2012a | 1.22 | 1.83* | 2.36* | 1.24 | 2.04* |
| Depression in 2012a | 1.42¶ | 1.68* | 1.73* | 1.72* | 3.46* |
| Anxiety in 2012a | 1.55* | 1.22 | 1.03 | 2.06* | 3.35* |
Note: In addition to the variables included in the table, we controlled for all variables which had a p-value <0.25 in the Table 3; including alcohol abuse in 2012, length of education, and socio-economic status in 2012 (all these variables were insignificant in the model).
*p-value <0.05.
¶p-value <0.10.
aHaving a score equal/above the selected cut-off level.