Quality of life, physical diseases, and psychological impairment among survivors 3 years after Wenchuan earthquake: a population based survey.

BACKGROUND: Few research studies have addressed the long-term effects caused by catastrophes, and no study has ever explored the life quality, physical diseases, and psychological impairment of earthquake survivors at the same time. This study seeks to reveal survivors' quality of life, physical diseases, and mental health.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted through multi-stage sampling approach three years after the Wenchuan earthquake.
RESULTS: A total of 2525 subjects were interviewed. Symptoms of PTSD were reported by 8.8% of the respondents from the seriously affected areas and 0.5%, the less hit areas. Prevalence of chronic diseases was 39.2% and 22.1% respectively, and two-week prevalence rate, 24.9% and 12.7% respectively. In the multivariate analysis, two-week prevalence, displacement, no regular income, receiving mental health support after the disaster, family members died or missing, injured due to the quake, and person who witnessed someone being killed or injured were independently associated with higher prevalence for symptoms of PTSD. Most subscales of SF-12 negatively correlated with age, chronic diseases, two-week prevalence, injured due to the disaster, home or property loss, and score of the 3-year PTSD symptoms, but positively correlated with higher education and higher household income.
CONCLUSIONS: The rates of physical diseases and symptoms of PTSD were relatively high, and the quality of life was poor among victims in the hard-hit areas 3 years after the earthquake. Physical impairment correlated with symptom of PTSD, and both were negatively associated with quality of life.

Introduction

The massive earthquake measuring 8.0 on the Richter scale that hit Wenchuan on 12 May 2008 had affected 417 counties and districts in ten provinces, covering some 500 000 km2 and left millions of people homeless. As of 25 August 2008, 69 226 people were killed, 374 643 injured and 17 923 missing.

Shortly after the disaster, Chinese government allocated more than 300 billion Yuan from the central budget for the reconstruction of the most seriously affected counties and assembled a special working group. Meanwhile, 19 provinces and municipalities partnered with the earthquake affected areas in the course of reconstruction. They've managed to rebuild 1.9 million houses in villages, and more than 200 thousand in cities within three years after the catastrophe. Over two thousand hospitals have also been rebuilt [1]. As a result, the accessibility and availability of medical services in the earthquake-stricken areas have improved significantly. Moreover, health insurance has covered the majority (94%) of the population [2].

While the Chinese people have achieved a reconstruction miracle, local survivors' long-term health status, including physical disease, mental health, and quality of life, are to be revealed. A recent systematic review [3] showed that the number of health related academic articles dropped dramatically 2 years after the earthquake, which, to some extent, reflected, that researchers ignored the long term impact of a disaster to the affected population. Previous researches have shown that post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other psychological health problems were common among earthquake survivors [4]–[8], and some of them demonstrated that quality of life tended to be worsen or influenced by the mental impairment [9], [10]. Nevertheless, up to now, to the best of our knowledge, no researches have addressed earthquake survivors' quality of life, physical diseases, and psychological impairment simultaneously.

China tops the list of the number of devastating earthquakes, but the number of researches on long-term disaster related health problems was very few. A comprehensive understanding of survivors' health status is essential for identifying vulnerable populations and developing culturally specific health interventions. As a public health response, a population-based survey was conducted to reveal the prevalence of symptoms of PTSD, physical disease, quality of life, and associated factors among random samples in the seriously hard-hit areas and less affected ones.

Methods

Ethics Statement

This study protocol was approved as a less than minimal risk research by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of West China Hospital in Sichuan University. Many of the people in rural areas of west China and the earthquake-affected areas are illiterate. Written consent is not common practice and may violate confidentiality. Therefore, a consent form to obtain verbal consent from respondents was proposed and approved by the IRB, together with the study protocol. Prior to the interview, each investigator read carefully the consent form, which contains information on the objectives of the study, the selection process, risks, benefits and freedom of the participation, as well as information on confidentiality.

Study design and participants

A cross-sectional survey was conducted from May to June 2011, three years after the disaster. The study recruited participants based on households in the earthquake stricken rural areas, including the seriously hard-hit counties (Wenchuan, Shifang, and Mianzhu) and the less-hit counties (Shuangliu, Xindu, and Qingshen). The survey was designed and conducted by a multidisciplinary group that consisted of epidemiologists, psychologists, biostatisticians, sociologists, and physicians. All data were collected through face-to-face interview questionnaires, and all interviewers were trained before the pilot study and formal study. Subjects must have been present at the time of the earthquake and above the age of 7 at the time of interview. Subject was ineligible if he/she was diagnosed mental health impairment before the disaster. A multi-stage cluster sampling approach was adopted (figure 1). As most earthquake affected regions are located in high mountains or deep valleys with slope of at least 60°, it was impossible to take a random sample in the final stage, during which we selected households based on convenience and consultation with local healthcare providers to assure sample's representativeness.

Figure 1

Flow chart of sampling stages.

*Households were used as the primary sampling unit.

Measures

According to our definition, chronic diseases should fall into the following list: chronic non-specific lung disease (asthma, bronchitis and pulmonary emphysema), cardiac diseases, atherosclerotic disease, cerebrovascular disease (stroke, excluding transient ischemic attacks), diabetes mellitus, malignant neoplasms, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. All the above chronic diseases should be diagnosed by physicians in hospitals or clinics before the investigation with current symptoms or treatments. Two-week morbidity was investigated by asking the interviewees whether members of their households had been ill in the previous two weeks, and measured based on the number of people ill in the past two weeks.

We adopted the instrument of PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C) to measure the symptoms of PTSD [11]. The instrument is a self-report 17-item symptom scale that corresponds to DSM-IV criteria [12], and is often used when a clinical interview is not feasible [13],[14]. Total score ranges from 17 to 85, and an adult with a score of 38 or greater was classified as having probable PTSD [13], [15]. The Internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha coefficient) of the PCL-C in our study was 0.80.

The short form 12-v2 (SF12-v2) was used to measure the quality of life (QOL), which was a shorter form with 12 questions all selected from SF-36 [16]. It provided a glimpse into the mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. The 12 questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create eight subscales (general health perceptions (GH), physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE) and mental health (MH)) and two components (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)). The two summary components of PCS and MCS and the eight subscales, including PF, RP, BP, GH, VT, SF, RE and MH, were scored based on the US norm [17], with higher scores indicating better QOL.

To address potential sources of bias and ensure the quality of this study, a number of approaches were used. At the stage of developing questionnaire, we organized an inter-disciplinary group to make the items understandable, representative, and objective. Before the formal investigation, all the interviewers were trained systematically and a pilot study was performed. When conducting field interview, a local healthcare provider who was quite familiar with the local residents was invited to explain the purpose of this study to participants. This contributed to a high response rate (91.3%) in total. We also adopted a multistage sampling method to reduce selection bias and multivariate analyses to minimize the effects of confounders.

Sample size

The sample size was calculated on the basis of an assumed PTSD prevalence of 10% in the hard-stricken areas and 6% in the less-hit areas, a value of 0.9 for power and 0.05 for alpha (significance level) as well. The initially estimated sample size was 1,014 for each group. However, we increased the primary sample size by 15% to avoid the loss of potential non-respondents. Thus our minimum sample size for each group was 1,166 subjects. Estimates of PTSD prevalence in earthquake hard hit areas within a short term after the disaster varied from 9.4% to 45.5% [18], [19]. Considering the potential time effect, we used 10% prevalence in hard-hit area and 6% in less-stricken area respectively to calculate the sample size of our survey. Households were used as the primary sampling units.

Statistical analysis

Frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviations were calculated for descriptive data, t-tests were used to evaluate differences in continuous variables, and Chi-square tests were used to test for significance in categorical data. If continuous variables were not normally distributed, Mann-Whitney U tests were applied. Backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression and multiple linear regression were used to identify risk factors for PTSD symptoms and quality of life, respectively. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill).

Results

Of the 1206 eligible respondents in hard-hit area (response rate, 93.8%), 44.9% were male, 58.8% received primary or lower level of education, and 17.2% were minorities; their mean age (SD) was 46.4(16.5) (range, 16–90). Of the 1319 respondents in less-hit area (response rate, 89.1%), 48.7% were male, 52.2% received primary or lower level of education, and 1.6% were minorities; their mean age (SD) was 47.9(16.8) (range, 16–94) (table 1). In almost all cases, absence or age under 16 at the time of the interview was the reason for nonparticipation. The mean age and sex of hard-hit and less-hit area participants were not significantly different from the nonparticipants.

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the populations of hart-hit and less-hit areas, Sichuan Province, China 3 years after Wenchuan earthquake.

Characteristic	Hard-hit area	Less-hit area	p-value
Gender			0.056
Male, No. (%)	542(44.9)	643(48.7)
Female, No. (%)	664(55.1)	676(51.3)
Age, mean (SD), y	46.4(16.5)	47.9(16.8)	0.032
Education			0.001
Primary school or lower, No. (%)	709(58.8)	689(52.2)
Higher than primary school, No. (%)	497(41.2)	630(47.8)
Ethnicity			<0.001
Han, No. (%)	999(82.8)	1298(98.4)
Minorities, No. (%)	207(17.2)	21(1.6)
Household income			<0.001
RMB0–5000, No. (%)	156(12.9)	142(10.8)
RMB5000–20000, No. (%)	746(61.9)	564(42.8)
RMB20000–50000, No. (%)	266(22.1)	540(40.9)
RMB≥50000, No. (%)	38(3.2)	73(5.5)

Symptoms of PTSD were reported by 8.8% of the participants in the hard affected areas and 0.5% of those in less hit areas, respectively. The subscale and total scores of PTSD symptom are significantly higher in subjects from hard hit areas than those from the less hit areas (all P<0.001). Significant differences in subscales of quality of life between the two groups were demonstrated, except for social functioning; In general, participants in hard hit areas scored lower than those in less hit areas. Meanwhile, prevalence of chronic diseases and two-week prevalence rate were found much higher in severely hit regions than less affected regions (prevalence of chronic disease: 39.2% vs. 22.1; two-week prevalence rate: 24.9% vs. 12.7%). (table 2)

Table 2

Descriptive statistics of PTSD, quality of life, and physical diseases among participants from hard-hit and less-hit areas.

Variable	Hard-hit area	Less-hit area	p-value
PTSD symptom
Re-experiencing, mean (SD)	9.1(3.4)	5.9(1.8)	<0.001
Avoiding/numb, mean (SD)	9.0(2.9)	7.6(1.9)	<0.001
Hyper-arousal, mean (SD)	7.9(3.0)	5.5(1.4)	<0.001
Total score, mean (SD)	26.0(7.8)	19.1(4.5)	<0.001
Quality of life
Physical functioning, mean (SD)	51.3(9.7)	53.3(8.0)	<0.001
Role physical, mean (SD)	50.5(11.2)	53.8(8.0)	<0.001
Bodily pain, mean (SD)	50.8(10.9)	52.6(7.7)	<0.001
General health, mean (SD)	38.5(12.5)	42.8(11.7)	<0.001
Vitality, mean (SD)	54.7(7.0)	57.1(6.5)	<0.001
Social functioning, mean (SD)	54.5(6.3)	54.0(8.7)	0.119
Role emotional, mean (SD)	45.3(9.6)	48.9(7.9)	<0.001
Mental health, mean (SD)	49.6(7.8)	51.8(7.0)	<0.001
Mental component summary, mean (SD)	49.8(8.2)	51.8(7.7)	<0.001
Physical component summary, mean (SD)	49.3(12.2)	51.8(9.2)	<0.001
Physical diseases
Chronic diseases, No. (%)	473(39.2)	292(22.1)	<0.001
Two-week prevalence rate, No. (%)	300(24.9)	168(12.7)	<0.001

The results of bivariate analysis for risk factors of PTSD symptoms are shown in table 3. Symptoms of PTSD were significantly higher among those with lower education, lower family income, chronic diseases or illness within two weeks; those who had no regular income after the disaster, received mental health support after the earthquake, lost their family members, homes, properties or witnessed someone being killed or injured in the disaster; as well as females, the displaced, and the injured.

Table 3

Risk factors of PTSD symptoms by logistic regression.

	PTSD No.(%)	Bivariate OR (95% CI)	P Value	Multivariate OR(95% CI)	P Value
Gender			0.002	–
male	37(3.1)	0.53(0.36–0.80)
female	76(5.7)	1.00
Age (years)			0.935	–
<60 yrs	84(4.5)	0.98(0.64–1.51)
≥60 yrs	29(4.5)	1.00
Education			0.028	–
Primary school or lower	74(5.3)	1.56(1.05–2.32)
Higher than primary school	39(3.5)	1.00
Ethnicity			0.285		0.015
Han	106(4.6)	1.53(0.70–3.32)		2.70(1.21–6.02)
Minorities	7(3.1)	1.00		1.00
Household income			0.001	–
RMB0–5000	20(6.7)	2.80(1.51–5.17)
RMB5000–20000	70(5.3)	2.19(1.36–3.54)
RMB≥20000	23(2.5)	1.00
Chronic diseases*			0.001	–
Yes	51(6.7)	1.96(1.34–2.86)
No	62(3.5)	1.00
Two-week prevalence rate			<0.001		<0.001
Yes	46(9.8)	3.24(2.19–4.78)		2.45(1.62–3.72)
No	67(3.3)	1.00		1.00
Displaced after earthquake			<0.001		0.024
Yes	36(11.3)	3.52(2.32–5.33)		1.69(1.07–2.66)
No	77(3.5)	1.00		1.00
Have regular income after earthquake			0.003		0.001
Yes	23(2.7)	0.49(0.31–0.78)		0.45(0.27–0.73)
No	90(5.4)	1.00		1.00
Received mental health support after earthquake			<0.001		0.018
Yes	37(13.9)	4.74(3.12–7.19)		1.77(1.10–2.85)
No	74(3.3)	1.00		1.00
Family member died or missing during earthquake			<0.001		0.001
Yes	58(11.0)	4.34(2.96–6.37)		2.14(1.37–3.35)
No	55(2.8)	1.00		1.00
Injured due to the disaster			<0.001		0.006
Yes	59(10.5)	4.16(2.83–6.09)		1.86(1.19–2.90)
No	54(2.8)	1.00		1.00
Lost home or property			<0.001
Yes	111(5.3)	12.49(3.07–50.74)		–
No	2(0.4)	1.00
Witnessed someone being killed or injured			<0.001		0.013
Yes	83(8.6)	4.77(3.12–7.30)		1.96(1.15–3.35)
No	30(1.9)	1.00		1.00

PTSD symptoms: PCL-C score of 17 items ≥38.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder.

–Variable was not retained in backward stepwise regression procedure.

In the multivariate analysis, two-week prevalence, displacement after the disaster, having no regular income after the quake, receiving mental health support after the disaster, family members died or missing, person who injured due to the quake, and respondents who witnessed someone being killed or injured during the disaster were independently associated with higher prevalence for symptoms of PTSD (table 3).

Table 4 presents the results of multiple-regression analyses to predict the influence of factors on the scores of the QOL subscales and domains 3 years after the earthquake. The results revealed that most subscales negatively correlated with age, chronic diseases, two-week prevalence, injury due to the disaster, home or property loss, and score of the 3-year PTSD symptoms, but positively correlated with higher education and higher household income. The PCS scores negatively correlated with age, chronic diseases, two-week prevalence, injury due to the disaster, and score of the 3-year PTSD symptoms, but positively associated with higher education and household income. Meanwhile, the MCS score negatively correlated with score of the 3-year PTSD symptoms and positively correlated with age.

Table 4

Multiple linear regression analysis to predict scores of the subscales and domains of the SF-12 three years after the earthquake.

	PF	RP	BP	GH	VT	SF	RE	MH	PCS	MCS
Age (yrs)	−0.15**	−0.08**	−0.05**	−0.12**	−0.02*	–	0.08**	–	−0.15**	0.09**
Gender (F = 1/M = 0)	–	–	–	–	–	0.52	–	–	–	–
Education (rank from low to high = 1–5)	–	0.61**	0.35	0.79**	0.57**	–	–	–	0.62**	–
Ethnicity (Han = 1/Minorities = 0)	–	–	–	–	–	−0.93	–	−1.21*	–	−1.02
Household income(rank from low to high = 1–3)	0.87**	1.28**	0.77**	–	−0.42*	1.02**	0.93**	0.55*	0.75**	–
Chronic diseases(yes = 1/no = 0)	−4.44**	−6.87**	−4.68**	−9.39**	−1.96**	−1.10**	−1.44**	−1.18**	−7.63**	–
Two-week morbidity (yes = 1/no = 0)	−2.42**	−4.81**	−5.97**	−3.46**	−2.50**	−1.76**	–	−1.02*	−5.11**	–
Displaced after earthquake (yes = 1/no = 0)	–	–	–	−1.25*	−1.11**	–	–	–	–	–
Have regular income after earthquake(yes = 1/no = 0)	–	–	–	1.19**	–	–	–	–	–	–
Received mental health support after tsunami(yes = 1/no = 0)	1.15*	–	–	1.57*	–	–	–	–	1.16	–
Family member died or missing (yes = 1/no = 0)	–	1.14**	1.33**	1.67**	1.06**	–	–	–	1.26**	–
Injured due to the disaster (yes = 1/no = 0)	−3.71**	−3.03**	−2.73**	–	−1.95**	−1.58*	−2.62**	−1.19	−3.14**	−1.30
Lost home or property(yes = 1/no = 0)	−1.12*	–	−2.35**	−3.56**	−1.82**	2.65**	−0.94*	–	−2.25**	–
Witnessed someone being killed or injured(yes = 1/no = 0)	0.72	–	1.93**	–	–	0.92*	–	−0.68*	1.09*	–
PTSD score	−0.13**	−0.22**	−0.24**	−0.27**	−0.15**	−0.11**	−0.41**	−0.18**	−0.17**	−0.26**
Constant	62.70	59.52	60.57	57.36	63.67	52.80	51.92	55.51	62.72	53.66

p<0.05;

p<0.01;

– no significant.

Discussion

This population-based survey revealed higher prevalence of symptoms of PTSD, chronic diseases, and two-week morbidity, and lower quality of life among people in hard-hit areas than those in less affected areas.

Most hard-hit regions of the Wenchuan earthquake are located in remote and rural areas. Because of underdeveloped economy and lack of medical resources, along with the catastrophe, people there were more likely to be attacked by acute and chronic diseases, which contributed to the high prevalence of chronic diseases and two-week morbidity rate. However, Chinese government has made great efforts to reduce the negative impact of the disaster and promote public health. A good example is that the two-week morbidity rate was 27.6% and 21.8% in hard-hit areas and less-hit areas respectively three months after the earthquake [20], higher than the rates three years later revealed by our study.

A significant finding is that the receipt of mental health support after the earthquake was associated with symptoms of PTSD, which is similar to the finding of the tsunami survey [21]. The association was significant even in multivariate analysis and when considering the timing of support. One possible factor might be responsible for this result: lots of volunteers provided mental health consultation and psychological support for earthquake survivors, but not all the volunteers had the professional skills to deliver the service. However, no strong evidence revealed whether providing of mental health support could reduce the prevalence of PTSD, which should definitely be explored in the future.

Bivariate logistic regression revealed that chronic diseases, and multivariate analysis showed that two-week morbidity were associated with symptoms of PTSD. It indicated that the physical diseases might be important risk factors of mental health. In multivariate analysis, displacement was an independent risk factor for symptoms of PTSD. Since Chinese government has provided permanent housing for earthquake victims (especially the displaced persons), this result reminded us that the displaced survivors might be fragile and need to be given more concerns. Meanwhile, this study demonstrated that having regular income after the disaster could significantly reduce the risk of developing PTSD.

The loss of a family member, being injured due to the disaster, and witnessing someone being killed or injured by the earthquake were contributory factors for PTSD symptoms, similar to the findings of a previous study which was conducted 15 months after the Wenchuan earthquake [22].

In our study, the prevalence of 8.8% for symptoms of PTSD among hard-hit areas 3 years after the disaster was lower than that found one year after the earthquake in similar regions [18], [23], which proved that though symptoms of PTSD among survivors were serious, they might decrease as the time goes by.

In the quality of life subscales, prominent potential risk factors were noted, including age, education level, household income, chronic diseases, two-week morbidity, family member dead or missing due to the disaster, injured, prominent financial or home loss immediately after earthquake, and PTSD score. When subjects were elderly, there was a significant negative correlation in the PCS dimension of quality of life but positive correlation in the MCS dimension. Physical illness, including chronic diseases, two-week morbidity, and injured due to earthquake, was a statistically negative association with most of the subscales of quality of life. Notably, a higher PTSD score might be a true risk factor to all subscales of quality of life. A study [24] has shown that financial loss affects physical and psychological health. However, this study demonstrated that financial or property loss only negatively associated with PCS by controlling potential confounders.

Some possible limitations of our study need to be mentioned. Firstly, the instrument of SF-12 was developed and validated in the Western world and cultural factors may therefore play a role in the underreporting or overreporting for symptoms of PSTD. However, this study showed that the Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient for the SF-12 was 0.802, which exceeded the recommended level of 0.70 [25] and was consistent with LUO Xuemei's reports [26], indicating the good internal consistency reliability of the SF-12 in earthquake survivors. Secondly, there was no baseline data of the participants interviewed. As a result, we failed to explore the changes of physical diseases, mental health, and quality of life among survivors directly. Nevertheless, several studies pertaining to the Wenchuan earthquake have reported some useful information on survivors' physical diseases, mental health, or quality of life within a short time after the disaster, providing good comparisons to our findings [18], [20], [23], [27]. An additional drawback is that in this paper we failed to address other mental health problems such as anxiety and depression, though such problems were not our research priorities.

We believe that the strengths of this study are as follows. First, this is a population-based survey using multi-stage sampling approach, which made the findings reliable and representative. Second, compared with other short-term post-disaster studies [28],[29], this long-term post-disaster study had a larger sample size. Therefore, we believe our findings are robust and could provide reference for medical decision-making. Last but not least, our research, for the first time, explored the long-term physical diseases, mental illness, and quality of life of earthquake survivors, and revealed their relationships to some extent.